Ex­tremely Slow Growth in the Seabed

by Roberto

Es­ti­mates are that, at the global scale, there are more mi­cro­bial cells – maybe 5 x 1029 – in the seabed than in the wa­ter col­umn above. These cells are not just near the seafloor, many of them they lie buried deep in the sed­i­ment. Very deep in­deed, as deep as 2.5 kilo­me­ters. And they've been there for a long time, even mil­lions of years (see here in STC). How can we know this? This is not your stan­dard mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy field work; you can't just de­cide to get up and go sam­pling. You'll need ma­jor equip­ment, like the cor­ers found aboard the Neil Arm­strong re­search ves­sel, housed at Woods Hole, MA (Fig. 1). Plus, the spe­cial­ized equip­ment and method­olo­gies to an­a­lyze the core sam­ples ob­tained. But with the proper care and con­trols, what you find is "out of this world" mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy. Yet, it's how most ma­rine mi­crobes live.

Fig. 1. Crew on the Woods Hole Oceano­graphic In­sti­tute re­search ves­sel Neil Arm­strong pre­pare to de­ploy a sed­i­ment corer to the seafloor of the Puerto Rico Trench. (Photo by Paul Wal­czak, Ore­gon State Uni­ver­sity). Source

And how is that? What are these in­hab­i­tants of the deep bios­phere do­ing? Not un­ex­pect­edly, what­ever they do, they do it very slowly. Their times scales are lit­er­ally ge­o­logic. Imag­ine you are a bac­terium that finds it­self in a mi­cro­bial com­mu­nity at the seafloor. Sed­i­ment will ac­cu­mu­late over your com­mu­nity at about 1 me­ter per 100,000 years. So, by the time you are 40 me­ters be­low the seafloor, you (or your de­scen­dants) will have been there 4 mil­lion years. Those mi­crobes found kilo­me­ters be­low the seafloor will have been there 100 mil­lion years or more. The deeper they are, the less resid­ual or­ganic mat­ter will be avail­able for their growth and main­te­nance me­tab­o­lism. Es­ti­mates are that a typ­i­cal dou­bling time in these en­vi­ron­ments is in the or­der of 1000 years.

Why should those mi­crobes still be meta­bol­i­cally ac­tive? Why not just form an en­dospore and go to­tally dor­mant? Sounds like a Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion but it's not. The an­swer is known. Com­pletely dor­mant spores do not sur­vive well be­cause they can't re­pair the spon­ta­neous DNA dam­age over such long times. Spores might be okay for a few thou­sand years. But ap­par­ently, af­ter that, it's much bet­ter to be main­tain low meta­bolic ac­tiv­ity. Of course, by lab­o­ra­tory stan­dards, all those deep bios­phere cells are dor­mant. Tells you how far off lab­o­ra­tory con­di­tions can be from what hap­pens down there.

If you now feel mo­ti­vated to learn more about of mi­cro­bial life in the very slow lane, I highly rec­om­mend you read "Slow Mi­cro­bial Life in the Seabed," by Bo Barker Jør­gensen and Ian Mar­shall. A thrilling re­view that I sus­pect you won't be able to put down un­til you're done!

 

Do you want to com­ment on this post? We would be happy about it! Please send us an email, or com­ment on Mastodon, or on Bluesky.

Other Posts