Frost Flow­ers Come to Life

by Jody Dem­ing

Biofilms are the hall­mark of mi­cro­bial life in all man­ner of nat­ural and en­gi­neered set­tings. The defin­ing fea­tures of a ma­ture biofilm in­clude high den­si­ties of mi­crobes, as­so­ci­a­tion with a sur­face, and ex­tra­cel­lu­lar poly­sac­cha­ride sub­stances (EPS) — of­ten very spe­cific com­pounds — that give ar­chi­tec­tural struc­ture to these habi­tats. But what about early stages of biofilm for­ma­tion. How many mi­crobes does it take to make a biofilm, and how much of what type of EPS to pro­vide struc­ture? What if the in­volved sur­face can pro­vide enough ar­chi­tec­tural struc­ture it­self yet is al­ways chang­ing? What if that "sur­face" is sea ice?

Fig­ure 1. Frost flow­ers grow­ing on thin new sea ice in the Amund­sen Gulf, as ob­served from the CCG re­search ice­breaker Amund­sen in De­cem­ber, 2007, dur­ing the In­ter­na­tional Po­lar Year (IPY) Cir­cum­po­lar Flaw Lead (CFL) sys­tem study. Credit: Eric Collins.

For lit­er­ally cen­turies, po­lar ex­plor­ers have been aware that in the spring­time the bot­tom of sea­sonal sea ice be­comes vis­i­ble dis­col­ored. To­day we know that what they were see­ing is a pho­to­syn­the­sis-based biofilm of grand pro­por­tions. By March, when the sun spends enough time above the hori­zon to ini­ti­ate the ice-al­gal bloom, the sea ice cover over the Arc­tic Ocean alone (sea ice also sur­rounds Antarc­tica, of course) ex­tends more than 14 mil­lion square kilo­me­ters, even in this era of cli­mate-dri­ven re­duc­tions in the cryos­phere. Only in the last decade, how­ever, have we re­al­ized that this highly porous sea ice, flushed at its ice-wa­ter in­ter­face with sea­wa­ter from be­low, is also filled with EPS, the sticky ex­u­dates of mi­cro­scopic al­gae and bac­te­ria that par­tially ac­count for their en­trap­ment in the ice as it forms in au­tumn and through win­ter. These com­pounds, which par­ti­tion into the brine phase of the ice along with the mi­crobes and other "im­pu­ri­ties" of sea­wa­ter, are now un­der­stood to serve a myr­iad of bi­o­log­i­cal func­tions within the ice, from cryo- and os­mo­pro­tec­tion to pos­si­ble vi­ral de­fense. As win­ter pro­gresses and the ice chills to tem­per­a­tures be­low –20 °C near its up­per sur­face, this porous habi­tat un­der­goes marked phys­i­cal changes. Whereas the warmer (–2 °C) bot­tom ice is still about 20% liq­uid, in the up­per deeply frozen hori­zons of the ice the in­hab­it­able vol­ume is re­duced to 2% or less. As a re­sult of this tem­per­a­ture-dri­ven process, mi­crobes and every­thing en­trapped in the ice with them be­come con­cen­trated into in­creas­ingly small, cold, and briny pore spaces, with no ob­vi­ous out­lets even as ice crys­tals en­croach.

Fig­ure 2. Lab-grown frost flow­ers at –21°C, wet with brine and with 1cm long den­drites. Credit: Jeff Bow­man.

Sounds rough. Yet, evo­lu­tion has a way of ame­lio­rat­ing sit­u­a­tions that, to us, will al­ways seem in­tol­er­a­bly ex­treme. Both Bac­te­ria and Ar­chaea sur­vive well even in the cold­est por­tions of win­try Arc­tic sea ice (down to –28 °C). How­ever, to sur­vive the win­ter, eu­kary­otic ice al­gae and other pro­tists must keep mi­grat­ing down­wards into the warmer, wet­ter bot­tom ice and wa­ters as the ice grows thicker. Note that this sea ice is not to be con­fused with glacial or fresh­wa­ter ice, the far less porous and less in­hab­it­able type of ice that cov­ers Green­land and Antarc­tica. Re­cent work in­clud­ing de­tailed mi­cro­scopic eval­u­a­tions of win­ter and spring sea ice has re­vealed how that ver­sa­tile, biofilm-es­sen­tial ma­te­r­ial called EPS works to keep the liv­ing quar­ters of mi­crobes within the ice hab­it­able. The ex­tra­cel­lu­lar ma­te­r­ial al­ters the phys­i­cal prop­er­ties of the ice, pro­vid­ing more oc­cu­pi­able pore space than oth­er­wise pos­si­ble at a given tem­per­a­ture. Al­though the ice ma­trix it­self is pro­vid­ing the ar­chi­tec­tural struc­ture to this habi­tat, com­po­nents of the EPS (likely gly­co­pro­teins) sculpt the ice to the ben­e­fit of the mi­cro­bial in­hab­i­tants. There is even ev­i­dence to sug­gest that if not enough EPS was en­trained when the ice first formed, the en­trapped bac­te­ria will pro­duce more of it as con­di­tions worsen in win­ter.

Fig­ure 3. Grad­u­ate stu­dent Jeff Bow­man sam­pling frost flow­ers on thin ice near the North Pole dur­ing an ex­pe­di­tion of Swedish ice­breaker Oden in Sep­tem­ber 2009. Credit: Matthias Wi­etz.

But wait. Are the mi­crobes in­escapably en­trapped dur­ing win­ter, with no way out? As at­mos­pheric tem­per­a­tures drop in fall and win­ter and sea ice forms, the thin young sea ice does in­deed of­fer a way out for its in­hab­i­tants, and not only in the down­wards di­rec­tion as brine is grav­i­ta­tion­ally ex­pelled back into the ocean dur­ing the freeze-up pe­riod. Liq­uid brine of high salin­ity (e.g., > 20% salt) also ex­pels up­wards onto the sur­face of the ice, where it forms a wet film that does not freeze even at very low at­mos­pheric tem­per­a­tures. In­stead, if the air-ice ther­mal gra­di­ent is sharp enough, the air mois­ture great enough, and the ice-nu­cle­at­ing par­ti­cles nu­mer­ous enough, vast fields of frost flow­ers will grow on the sur­face of the new ice (Fig. 1), wick­ing the sur­face brine into their den­dritic "petals" (Fig. 2). These salty frost flow­ers, long known by po­lar ex­plor­ers for their aes­thetic beauty, have re­cently be­come sub­jects of sci­en­tific in­ter­est given their unique light-scat­ter­ing prop­er­ties and their abil­ity to con­cen­trate chem­i­cal con­t­a­m­i­nants (like mer­cury) from the at­mos­phere. They are ex­pected to in­crease in areal ex­tent with con­tin­ued Arc­tic warm­ing, as more wa­ter opens in win­ter to freeze again as thin ice. Not un­til last year, how­ever, were frost flow­ers re­ported to con­tain bac­te­ria, and plenty of them rel­a­tive to the un­der­ly­ing ice, as well as high con­cen­tra­tions of EPS in some cases. Here then, un­der ex­treme con­di­tions on the frozen sur­face of an ocean, there forms what may be con­sid­ered an­other vast biofilm, even if an ephemeral one. Newly dis­cov­ered, it awaits fur­ther ex­plo­ration. You can well imag­ine all the plan­ning and sam­pling (Fig. 3), cul­tur­ing and ex­tract­ing, se­quenc­ing and mod­el­ing rather ex­cit­edly un­der­way!

 

Ref­er­ences

Collins RE, Ro­cap G, Dem­ing JW, (2010). Per­sis­tence of bac­te­r­ial and ar­chaeal com­mu­ni­ties in sea ice through an Arc­tic win­ter. En­vi­ron­men­tal Mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy, 12 (7), 1828−1841. PMID 20192970

Krembs C, Eicken H, Dem­ing JW. (2011). Ex­opoly­mer al­ter­ation of phys­i­cal prop­er­ties of sea ice and im­pli­ca­tions for ice hab­it­abil­ity and bio­geo­chem­istry in a warmer Arc­tic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 108(9), 3653−3653. PMID 21368216

 

Jody Deming


Prof. Dem­ing holds the Wal­ters En­dowed Pro­fes­sor­ship in the School of Oceanog­ra­phy at the Univer­sity of Wash­ing­ton in Seat­tle.

 

Other Posts

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
15 years ago

Truly in­ter­est­ing ar­ti­cle –I've just linked it to my ar­ti­cle on biofilms and walk­ing P. aerug­i­nosa here:
http://www.suite101.com/content/life-in-a-biofilm-cozy-but-complicated-a300124

Emily Bull
14 years ago

Hi I am in my first year of Uni­ver­sity and for one of my mi­cro­bial world study top­ics I am look­ing at Po­lar mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy. This area truly fas­ci­nates me and I was won­der­ing if you knew of any re­search or blog ar­ti­cles on the area? Thanks.