Sens­ing the World

by Me­chas

I re­cently trav­elled to my home­town of Cali, Colom­bia, where I was sur­prised by an an­nounce­ment on the air­port wall in­di­cat­ing that bac­te­ria also travel every­where. It seems mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy is mak­ing a dent in so­ci­ety. But how can we sense these mi­crobes? Per­haps we can get some clues from oc­to­puses. 

Fig. 1. Sign on air­port wall in Cali, Colom­bia: Bac­te­ria also travel every­where. Im­age credit: Me­chas Zam­brano

We live in a mi­crobe-rich world. And we are quickly ac­cu­mu­lat­ing data on our sur­round­ing mi­cro­bial com­mu­ni­ties, their com­po­si­tion, and their as­so­ci­a­tions with our well-be­ing and phys­i­ol­ogy. But we still lag in terms of un­der­stand­ing the de­tailed chem­i­cal con­ver­sa­tions un­der­ly­ing these in­ter­ac­tions. Un­cov­er­ing the spe­cific mol­e­cules within the rich ar­ray of sig­nals that sur­round us can be daunt­ing. This is where a sys­tem with clear con­nec­tions be­tween chem­i­cal sig­nals and an­i­mal re­sponses be­comes im­por­tant. One such model sys­tem is pro­vided by the oc­to­pus Oc­to­pus bi­mac­u­loides.

Oc­to­puses are both fas­ci­nat­ing and sur­pris­ing. These fear­some crea­tures are in­tel­li­gent, they have nine brains, three hearts, and blue blood, and they are skilled in cam­ou­flage and es­cape. They also use their eight flex­i­ble arms, which have most of their neu­rons, to ex­plore and taste their sur­round­ings via chemo­tac­tile re­cep­tors (CRs) lo­cated in suc­tion cups (suck­ers). By sens­ing sur­faces, they can dis­crim­i­nate be­tween live and de­cay­ing prey to avoid po­ten­tially toxic food sources, and, in the case of moth­ers, iden­tify and elim­i­nate non­vi­able em­bryos. But how are they able to do this? 

Re­searchers at Har­vard and UC San Diego ex­ploited the O. bi­mac­u­loides model sys­tem to test the hy­poth­e­sis that oc­to­puses can iden­tify mi­cro­bial metabo­lites and in­ter­pret these sig­nals. They first char­ac­ter­ized the mi­cro­bio­mes found on sur­faces as­so­ci­ated with feed­ing and egg groom­ing re­sponses: crab shells and egg cas­ings. These crab and egg sur­face mi­cro­bial com­mu­ni­ties dif­fered de­pend­ing on whether they were se­lected or re­jected by oc­to­puses, sug­gest­ingthat mi­cro­bio­mes in­flu­ence oc­to­pus be­hav­iors. 

Fig. 2 (A) Oc­to­pus bi­mac­u­loides dis­plays its sen­sory suck­ers (left) next to salient cues in­clud­ing crab prey (Lep­tuca pugi­la­tor, top right) and de­vel­op­ing oc­to­pus eggs (bot­tom right). (B) Scan­ning elec­tron mi­cro­graphs re­veal sur­face-ad­hered bacil­lus, coc­cus, and spir­il­lum bac­te­ria on crab shells and on oc­to­pus eggs; scale bar, 10 μm. © Dis­tinct mi­cro­biome com­mu­ni­ties were present on dif­fer­ent sur­faces from the octopus's habi­tat, n = 10 for each sur­face. Source

The next step, there­fore, in­volved cul­tur­ing mi­crobes and test­ing fil­tered su­per­natants for their ca­pac­ity to ac­ti­vate cloned chemo­tac­tile sen­sory re­cep­tor genes. Fur­ther frac­tion­a­tion of su­per­natants that ac­ti­vated sen­sory re­cep­tors led to the iso­la­tion of mol­e­cules that elicit dif­fer­ent re­sponses de­spite in­ter­act­ing with a sin­gle oc­to­pus re­cep­tor. They do so by bind­ing in dif­fer­ent struc­tural con­for­ma­tions. They were also suf­fi­cient to drive oc­to­pus be­hav­ior: the oc­to­puses re­jected crab mim­ics or false agarose eggs soaked in these mol­e­cules. 

We can now add an­other re­mark­able abil­ity to the al­ready grow­ing list of as­ton­ish­ing oc­to­pus feats: the de­tec­tion of spe­cific mol­e­cules from com­plex en­vi­ron­men­tal mi­cro­bio­mes. Specif­i­cally, the de­tec­tion of mol­e­cules that elicit be­hav­iors in­volved in ma­ter­nal care or pre­da­tion, both of which are im­por­tant for sur­vival. 

Al­though we fall short in com­par­i­son, we also have evolved strate­gies to keep harm­ful sub­stances at bay. Think of the times you have been dis­gusted by cer­tain food tex­tures or put off by foul-smelling sub­stances. These re­ac­tions may just be con­tribut­ing to your sur­vival by help­ing to tease apart what to in­gest. 

 


We'd be de­lighted to hear from you! You can com­ment be­low, send us an email or reach us via Bluesky or Mastodon. Please sub­scribe to get email no­ti­fi­ca­tions of our new posts.

Other Posts

  • Lud­dites, Re­joice!

    by Elio — Those who are un­der­whelmed by mod­ern tech­nol­ogy do not stand alone. A fun­gus made an "in­de­struc­tible" CD in­op­er­a­ble by grow­ing on its edge, de­vour­ing alu­minum and poly­car­bon­ate, and mak­ing short shrift of the "in­for­ma­tion pits," what­ever they are. This par­tic­u­lar CD had resided in Be­lize un­der...

  • Fun­go­ma­nia I. Fungi Make Flow­ers

    by Elio — Na­ture seems to be in­tent in fool­ing every­one, ex­pe­ri­enced botanists in­cluded. An ex­am­ple is seen in the abil­ity of some fungi to change the ter­mi­nal leaves of cer­tain mus­tard plants into what look like flo­ral petals, mak­ing them look like real flow­ers. Pol­li­nat­ing in­sects are at­tracted to them and land on these struc­tures...

  • The Great De­cel­er­a­tion

    by Roberto — As prob­a­bly all STC read­ers are al­ready well-aware, the end of ex­po­nen­tial growth of the hu­man pop­u­la­tion is near. The dou­bling time for hu­mans to go from 2 to 4 bil­lion was about fifty years. The pop­u­la­tion main­tained pretty much the same dou­bling time go­ing from 4 to 8 bil­lion.

  • The Slime That Smiles

    by Heidi Ar­jes — Have you ever won­dered how in­di­vid­ual fin­gers form? If you have taken a de­vel­op­men­tal bi­ol­ogy class, you know that the hand first de­vel­ops as a mit­ten-like struc­ture with the fu­ture fin­gers con­nected (Fig­ure 1). Later, dur­ing nor­mal de­vel­op­ment, the cells in the ar­eas be­tween the fin­gers un­dergo pro­grammed cell death, and thus…

  • A Whiff of Tax­on­omy – Al­tiar­chaeum ham­i­conexum

    by Roberto — Al­tiar­chaeum ham­i­conexum is a rel­a­tively re­cent ad­di­tion to the grow­ing list of mi­cro­bial pri­mary pro­duc­ers, i.e. those that fix CO2. Its first sight­ings date back only a lit­tle more than twenty years and its abil­ity to fix car­bon was rec­og­nized only the last decade. And, as so many mi­crobes, it has thus far re­sisted cul­ti­va­tion.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted