Mi­cro­bial Phys­i­ol­ogy and Di­ver­sity: What Was Old is New Again

by George A. O'Toole

I re­mem­ber think­ing at the end of my time as a Ph.D. stu­dent in Jorge Escalante-Semerena's lab at the Uni­ver­sity of Wis­con­sin-Madi­son that I loved the work I was do­ing study­ing anaer­o­bic phys­i­ol­ogy and me­tab­o­lism – specif­i­cally the biosyn­the­sis of vi­t­a­min B12 syn­the­sis in Sal­mo­nella. In my mis­guided youth, I did from time to time think it would be fun to work on some­thing that was a bit eas­ier to ex­plain to my par­ents and non-sci­ence friends, some­thing more "med­ically rel­e­vant." I did just that as a post­doc and as a pro­fes­sor – study­ing bac­te­r­ial biofilms for more than 20 years. This is clearly a topic that is med­ically, as well as en­vi­ron­men­tally and in­dus­tri­ally, rel­e­vant. But let me let you in on a lit­tle se­cret – I never stopped work­ing on bac­te­r­ial phys­i­ol­ogy and me­tab­o­lism, or ex­plor­ing mi­cro­bial di­ver­sity – and this is a good thing. For ex­am­ple, a large com­po­nent of the re­search on biofilm for­ma­tion in my lab stemmed from an in­ter­est in un­der­stand­ing how in­or­ganic phos­phate reg­u­lates biofilm for­ma­tion. Yes as a con­se­quence of this work we (by sheer hap­pen­stance) iden­ti­fied a c‑di-GMP-reg­u­lated ad­he­sion sys­tem con­served across the pro­teobac­te­ria, in­clud­ing many pathogens. But it was the drive to un­der­stand phys­i­o­log­i­cal re­sponses to an en­vi­ron­men­tal sig­nal that drove the work. Re­cently, my group has also been study­ing polymi­cro­bial com­mu­ni­ties in the con­text of the chronic air­way in­fec­tions as­so­ci­ated with cys­tic fi­bro­sis. Ex­am­in­ing two key pathogens in these chronic in­fec­tions, Pseudomonas aerug­i­nosa and Staphy­lo­coc­cus au­reus, has re­vealed a num­ber of in­ter­ac­tions im­pact­ing every­thing from co-ex­is­tence of the mi­crobes to an­tibi­otic tol­er­ance. Most of these in­ter­ac­tions, of course, are grounded in how the se­creted metabo­lites of one or­gan­ism im­pact that phys­i­ol­ogy and me­tab­o­lism of the other. So in many ways, I have come back to my roots study­ing mi­cro­bial phys­i­ol­ogy and me­tab­o­lism, and my need to un­der­stand the di­ver­sity of strate­gies mi­crobes use to com­pete or co­ex­ist with other mi­crobes. And I am not alone.

Fig­ure 1. The Ma­rine Bi­o­log­i­cal Lab­o­ra­tory, Woods Hole, MA (Source)

For the past 4 years I have been serv­ing as a fac­ulty in­struc­tor for the Mi­cro­bial Di­ver­sity Course at the Ma­rine Bi­o­log­i­cal Lab in Woods Hole. I no­ticed some­thing strik­ing this year. As we went around the room and stu­dents de­scribed their cur­rent projects, a full 50% used the word "mi­cro­biome" as part of their re­search de­scrip­tion, and an­other three talked about their in­ter­ests in soil mi­cro­bial com­mu­ni­ties. Four years ago, only one stu­dent used the word mi­cro­biome and soil com­mu­ni­ties were not men­tioned, at least that I can re­call. With the flood of mi­cro­biome data, in­clud­ing 16S rRNA gene se­quences and, in­creas­ingly, metage­nomics, the need to un­der­stand the ba­sic func­tion­ing of mi­cro­bial life – its phys­i­ol­ogy and me­tab­o­lism – and to do so across the tree of life has be­come ever more im­por­tant. But where will the next gen­er­a­tion of sci­en­tists learn all they need to learn to in­ter­pret this flood of data? I am sorry to say, not in typ­i­cal "mol­e­c­u­lar patho­gen­e­sis" pro­grams, and not solely by fo­cus­ing on the newest com­pu­ta­tional meth­ods or the "best" way to draw the tree of life. The next gen­er­a­tion of mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gists needs to in­cor­po­rate all the new, pow­er­ful ap­proaches to study­ing mi­crobes with the best train­ing they can re­ceive in un­der­stand­ing the di­ver­sity of mi­cro­bial strate­gies used to make en­ergy and syn­the­size cel­lu­lar com­po­nents. In 2018, Rachel Whitaker and I be­come the co-Di­rec­tors of the Mi­cro­bial Di­ver­sity Course at the Ma­rine Bi­o­log­i­cal Lab­o­ra­tory. As the name of the course im­plies, we will keep the fo­cus of the course on the won­der of the var­ied (and of­ten mind-blow­ing) meta­bolic and phys­i­o­log­i­cal path­ways of mi­crobes. From bac­te­ria, to ar­chaea, fungi and sin­gle-celled eu­kary­otes, mi­crobes have evolved truly amaz­ing ways to ex­ploit and flour­ish in every en­vi­ron­ment on Earth. We will be do­ing our best to do our part to train this next gen­er­a­tion of mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gists to read­ily an­a­lyze hun­dreds of mi­cro­bial genomes at a time and to make sense of com­plex metage­nomic data sets. But, im­por­tantly, to also be com­fort­able with un­der­stand­ing the likely elec­tron donors and ac­cep­tors in any given en­vi­ron­ment, and the bio­chem­i­cal path­ways needed to ex­ploit those re­sources. But we clearly can­not do this alone!

Dur­ing my time as a post-doc in Roberto Kolter's lab, there was an ex­plo­sion of clever tech­nolo­gies for iden­ti­fy­ing new vir­u­lence fac­tors, and the ad­vent of Tn-Seq and a va­ri­ety of 'omics ap­proaches con­tinue this tra­di­tion. I have of­ten joked with stu­dents that the most in­ter­est­ing find­ings from these many stud­ies are of­ten in the sup­ple­men­tal data… You know, those "me­tab­o­lism-re­lated" func­tions that are of­ten so puz­zling to un­der­stand. I be­lieve, how­ever, that there is a grow­ing ap­pre­ci­a­tion for the need to dig deeper and un­der­stand how ba­sic as­pects of mi­cro­bial phys­i­ol­ogy and me­tab­o­lism in di­verse com­mu­ni­ties of mi­crobes im­pact their en­vi­ron­ment (whether in­side or out­side a host), their in­ter­ac­tions and their abil­ity to thrive in ever-chang­ing mi­croniches. For ex­am­ple, we now know that vi­t­a­min B12 plays a key role in the ecol­ogy of the hu­man gut (1). I guess I was work­ing on some­thing med­ically rel­e­vant dur­ing my Ph.D. af­ter all! Prod­ucts of mi­cro­bial fer­men­ta­tions in the in­tes­tine, like bu­tyrate and pro­pi­onate, im­pact sys­temic im­mu­nity (2), gen­er­at­ing and uti­liz­ing novel elec­tron ac­cep­tors can im­pact vir­u­lence in Sal­mo­nella (3), and un­der­stand­ing how mi­cro­bial pathogens like Le­gionella sur­vive in­side a vac­uole re­quires a deep un­der­stand­ing of their phys­i­ol­ogy and me­tab­o­lism (4).

The won­der of mi­cro­bial phys­i­ol­ogy and me­tab­o­lism across the tree of mi­cro­bial life, of­ten con­sid­ered "old fash­ioned" is now back in fash­ion again – be­cause it has to be. As a com­mu­nity, when we think about the train­ing that our stu­dents and fel­lows will need to be suc­cess­ful in the decades ahead, we need to con­sider com­pre­hen­sive train­ing that melds the use of quan­ti­ta­tive and sta­tis­ti­cal an­a­lytic tools to mine "big data," the abil­ity to pro­gram, and learn­ing how to tackle ge­nomic and metage­nomic datasets. But we also have to re­mem­ber that un­der­stand­ing the di­ver­sity of mi­cro­bial life, and how those mi­crobes make a liv­ing, needs to be part of the pic­ture.

 

Ref­er­ences

  1. Deg­nan PH, Taga ME, Good­man AL. 2014. Vi­t­a­min B12 as a mod­u­la­tor of gut mi­cro­bial ecol­ogy. Cell Metab 20:769–78.
  2. Louis P, Flint HJ. 2017. For­ma­tion of pro­pi­onate and bu­tyrate by the hu­man colonic mi­cro­biota. En­v­i­ron Mi­cro­biol 19:29–41.
  3. Rivera-Chavez F, Baum­ler AJ. 2015. The py­ro­ma­niac in­side you: Sal­mo­nella me­tab­o­lism in the host gut. Annu Rev Mi­cro­biol 69:31–48.
  4. Fon­seca MV, Swan­son MS. 2014. Nu­tri­ent sal­vaging and me­tab­o­lism by the in­tra­cel­lu­lar pathogen Le­gionella pneu­mophila. Front Cell In­fect Mi­cro­biol 4:12.

 

George O'Toole

George O'Toole is Pro­fes­sor in the De­part­ment of Micro­bio­logy & Im­munol­ogy in the Geisel School of Med­i­cine at Dart­mouth in Hanover, NH.

 

Other Posts

  • Ad­her­ing To The 'Repli­con Model' The Sloppy Way

    by Christoph — Sixty years ago Ja­cob, Bren­ner and Cuzin de­vised their 'Repli­con Model', in­spir­ing and use­ful guide­line for repli­ca­tion re­search ever since. Ac­cord­ing to the model, a 'Repli­con' is a ge­netic el­e­ment repli­cated from a sin­gle 'Repli­ca­tor' – repli­ca­tion ori­gin, in mod­ern terms – and repli­ca­tion is trig­gered by a pos­i­tive trans-act­ing fac­tor, the 'Ini­tia­tor'…

  • There is no "Z" in "Di­vi­sion"

    by Manuel Sánchez and Miguel Vi­cente — From wheels to tur­bines, hu­mans have in­vented a goodly num­ber of ma­chines to per­form var­i­ous me­chan­i­cal tasks. The same func­tion, e.g., to move a car, can be car­ried out by mo­tors of dif­fer­ent de­signs. This is also true for cells, where the same func­tion can be car­ried out by dif­fer­ently de­signed ma­chines. Just as most cars use a gaso­line en­gine, most mi­crobes...

  • Serendip­ity in Sci­ence

    by Roberto — Serendip­ity. I feel it is one of the most beau­ti­ful words in Eng­lish; it's so melodic and loaded with mean­ing. Per­haps I'm fas­ci­nated by it be­cause it is dif­fi­cult to trans­late into my na­tive Span­ish. Re­gard­less, it does seem that quite of­ten sci­en­tific dis­cov­er­ies hap­pen serendip­i­tously.

  • Mag­nif­i­cently long : Thiomar­garita mag­nifica

    by Christoph — Mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gists study mi­crobes with mi­cro­scopes be­cause they are not vis­ible to the na­ked eye. Un­less they are. This was ex­act­ly the case for "Can­di­da­tus Thio­mar­ga­ri­ta mag­ni­fi­ca", de­scribed in a re­cent Bio­Rχiv pre­print by Vol­lard et al. (2022): "A cen­ti­me­ter-long bac­te­ri­um with DNA com­part..." (more about the se­cond part of the ti­tle...

  • A Friend Turns 95 and Keeps Work­ing in the Lab

    by Elio Schaechter and Stan­ley Maloy — Abe Eisen­stark is an old friend of both of us. Elio was a grad­u­ate stu­dent in the Mid­west when he first met him. Abe was then a young fac­ulty mem­ber at nearby uni­ver­sity and was an in­spir­ing men­tor to whom Elio grav­i­tated straight­away. The story is a bit dif­fer­ent for Stan­ley…

  • The Phage Treaty

    by Roberto — In 1938, af­ter de­vel­op­ing a keen in­ter­est in genes, Max Del­brück ar­rived at Cal­tech set to work on Dro­so­phi­la ge­net­ics with Tho­mas Mor­gan. But, as some­one trained in theo­re­ti­cal phys­ics, the pace of work­ing with fruit flies pro­ved too slow. For­tu­na­te­ly for the his­tory of mo­le­cu­lar bio­logy, Del­brück met...