Catch as Catch Can

by Elio

Fig­ure 1. Fly­pa­per. Source

The much ad­mired late ma­rine mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gist Ralph Le­win coined the term "ixotro­phy" to de­scribe how cer­tain bac­te­ria catch their prey by hav­ing a sticky sur­face (Iχo- is de­rived from the Greek for "sticky" and iχos means bird­lime, the name of the gluey stuff used for trap­ping birds). Many read­ers, at least the older ones, will be re­minded of fly­pa­per.

Fig­ure 2. Sal­mo­nella ty­phimurium cells trapped through their fla­gella along the fil­a­men­tous cell sur­face of S. gran­dis. Source

The bac­te­ria en­dowed with this tal­ent are species of Sa­pro­spira, glid­ing mem­bers of the phy­lum Bac­teroidetes. (Novel and ex­cit­ing mech­a­nisms of glid­ing motil­ity have been re­cently dis­cussed by Nan and Zus­man.) Sa­pro­spi­ra­ceae are also found in biofilm commu­ni­ties that col­o­nize al­gal sur­faces (i.e., are epi­phytic). Per­haps the best stud­ied is the ma­rine Saprospira gran­dis, which is com­mon in coastal zones around the world. It pro­duces a sticky sub­stance on its sur­face that en­snares fla­gel­lated bac­te­ria, even­tu­ally lysing them and us­ing the lysate as food. It has been aptly called "A Grand Preda­tor on the Seashore".

Fig­ure 3. Rhapi­do­some of S. gran­dis; (a) in­tact, (b) core and © sheath. Neg­a­tively stained with H₃PW₁₂O₄₀. Scale: 100 nm. Source

Ly­sis takes place through di­rect cell-to-cell con­tact and not through se­creted bac­te­ri­ci­dal sub­stances. In­ter­est­ing­ly, heat killed cells are not caught. S. gran­dis also make "rhapido­somes", nee­dle-like struc­tures that re­semble phage-tail-type bac­te­ri­ocins such as the R‑type py­ocin of Pseudomonas aerug­i­nosa. The rods are com­posed of two hol­low cylin­dri­cal struc­tures that are stri­king­ly sim­i­lar to tail com­po­nents – core and con­tracted sheath – of var­i­ous phages, e.g., the T‑even col­iphages. Are they parts of de­fec­tive phages? Are they in­volved in killing the prey? Much is left to be learned…

Fig­ure 4. Bun­dles of Saprospira gran­dis. Source

Ixotro­phy is not a sim­ple process, but its sev­eral stages can be sorted out. First comes the trap­ping of the prey cells on the sur­face of the preda­tor. The prey cells are caught by the tips of their fla­gella. What it is about the tips that makes them es­pe­cially rec­og­niz­able re­mains to be ex­plained. The trapped prey cells are then trans­lo­ca­ted to one place along the preda­tor cells, usu­ally its pol­es. The preda­tor even­tu­ally di­gests the prey and uses its con­tents for food. Ad­he­sion does not de­pend on the an­ti­ge­nic prop­er­ties or hand­ed­ness of the prey's fla­gella. The fla­gella need not be ac­tive, as non­motile cells with straight or oth­er­wise non­func­tional fla­gella are also trapped, al­though at lower ef­fi­ciency. Catch­ing the fla­gella by the tail is not the only way that Saprospira kill their prey but is cer­tainly the most dra­matic one.

Fig­ure 5. At­tack of of a Saprospira sp. on a co­lo­ny of Vit­re­oscilla ster­co­raria. A 0 h; B 5.25 h; C 20.25 h; D 48.75 h. Source

S. gran­dis cells make he­li­cal fil­a­ments up to 500 µm long that can tan­gle with one an­other to make large twisted ag­gre­gates. Some form or­derly bun­dle-like struc­tures. These bun­dles are sur­rounded by an en­ve­lope and move as groups. As cell den­sity in­creases, the bun­dles within the en­velopes get big­ger. When the cells glide on sur­fa­ces, some of those fil­a­ment bun­dles are left be­hind. The au­thors pon­der that this "group be­havior might al­low a more ef­fi­cient cap­ture of bac­te­r­ial prey... This group be­havior might al­low a more ef­fi­cient cap­ture of bac­te­r­ial prey".

Saprospi­ras also ac­tively prey upon di­atoms. They par­tial­ly de­grade the di­atoms' cell walls at the con­tact sites, then bac­te­ria pen­e­trate and lyse the di­atom cells. This mat­ters be­cause these di­atoms are used as a liv­ing food for the lar­vae of some sea urchins and bi­valves.

Preda­tors like saprospi­ras may be in­deed use­ful in con­trolling the un­wanted blooms of cyanobac­te­ria, such as those of­ten seen in eu­trophic lakes and reser­voirs. Such blooms can be dis­as­trous to health and the en­vi­ron­ment. Some cyanobac­te­r­ial blooms make high­ly toxic sub­stances that kill fish, do­mes­tic an­i­mals. At least one class, the mi­cro­cystins, are he­pa­to­tox­ins that can cause tu­mors in hu­mans. Such blooms are hard to con­trol, as in­expensive pro­ce­dures are not re­ally avail­able. In ad­di­tion, some Saprospiraceae ac­tively hy­drolyze pro­teins in ac­ti­vated-sludge waste treat­ment plants, so they play a role in the cy­cling of or­ganic ma­te­r­ial.

Fig­ure 6. Ly­sis of the di­atom Chaeto­ceros cera­to­spo­rum by Saprospira. A in­tact di­atom; B dia­tom in­va­ded by bac­terium; C di­atom with bac­teria within its cy­to­plasm; D,E de­graded dia­toms; F bac­te­r­ial cells left in a cir­cle. N nuc­leus; Chl chloro­plast; Mt mi­to­chon­drion; CW di­atom cell wall; Ba bac­te­r­ial cells. Scale: 1 µm (See all pan­els by click­ing on the fig­ure). Source

Pre­da­tion in the mi­cro­bial world is full of in­ge­nu­ity. Traps are laid, bul­lets are fired, sig­nals are emit­ted, and now, sticky stuff is laid out. A chal­leng­ing world for some, a re­warding one for oth­ers. Is any­body safe? So, don't you won­der, who preys on Saprospira?

 

Other Posts