Oddly Mi­cro­bial: Self­ish Genes*

Ed­i­tors' Note: This is the sev­enth in an on­go­ing se­ries about cells and processes that might not come im­me­di­ately to mind when you think "mi­crobe." The first six in our "Oddly Mi­cro­bial" se­ries by Mar­cia Stone can be found here: Ri­bo­cytes, Can­cer cells, 86-Mil­lion Year-Old Deep Seabed Mys­tery Cells, Pri­ons, Pro­grammed Cell Death, and Gi­ant Viruses.
 

by Mar­cia Stone

Evo­lu­tion is largely dri­ven by con­flict, not col­lab­o­ra­tion, ac­cord­ing to cell evo­lu­tion­ist Har­mit Ma­lik at the Fred Hutchin­son Can­cer Re­search Cen­ter (FHCRC). Mam­malian cells are con­tentious places, he ex­plains, pop­u­lated by alien and host ge­nomic se­quences fight­ing for dom­i­nance. "In the com­pe­ti­tion be­tween one gene fac­tion and an­other, the side that most re­cently changed — the ge­nomic mer­ce­nary or the host — tem­porar­ily wins putting a con­stant evo­lu­tion­ary pres­sure on the los­ing side to change as well," Ma­lik says. (For de­tails see here.) As the Red Queen in Through the Look­ing Glass said (al­beit about some­thing en­tirely dif­fer­ent): "Now, here, you see, it takes all the run­ning you can do, to keep in the same place." "Both par­ties have to rapidly evolve to re­store the sta­tus quo or run the risk of ex­tinc­tion and that" the essence of a clas­sic Red Queen arms race," Ma­lik adds.

The Fo­cus Has Been on Vi­ral In­trud­ers…

"Some vi­ral ge­netic el­e­ments have ac­ci­den­tally crashed into their host chro­mo­somes only once, while oth­ers have in­serted them­selves re­peat­edly, re­sult­ing in large fam­i­lies of closely re­lated alien se­quences pep­pered through­out the genome," says Cé­dric Feschotte, at the Uni­ver­sity of Utah. The best stud­ied "self­ish aliens" are en­doge­nous retro­viruses (ERVs), left by wave af­ter wave of an­cient in­va­sions. No­tably, pri­mate genomes are lit­tered with hun­dreds of thou­sands of ERVs that make up an es­ti­mated 8% of hu­man genes.

Fig­ure 1. The Red Queen and Al­ice (from Carroll's Through the Look­ing Glass)

How­ever, the new sci­ence of pa­le­ovi­rol­ogy re­veals an ar­ray of other an­cient vi­ral foot­prints in ver­te­brate genomes; for ex­am­ple, mod­ern-day ele­phants carry ghosts of Bor­navirus in­fec­tions that date back more than 90 mil­lion years and filovirus fos­sils in ro­dent genomes are es­ti­mated to be at least 30 mil­lion years old. An­cient he­pad­naviruses (he­pati­tis B) and fla­viviruses (West Nile and he­pati­tis C viruses) also left their foot­prints in mod­ern ver­te­brate genomes. "The con­flicts be­tween such vi­ral in­trud­ers and host genes shape many fun­da­men­tal as­pects of bi­ol­ogy and ac­knowl­edg­ing their im­por­tance pro­vides a more com­plete pic­ture of evo­lu­tion as well as of­fer­ing novel av­enues of re­search", ac­cord­ing to Ma­lik. (For de­tails see here.)

…But Our Res­i­dent Bac­te­r­ial Sym­bionts Can Be Con­tentious as Well

A small group of ded­i­cated mi­to­chon­dri­acs are ven­tur­ing be­yond alien vi­ral se­quences and dis­cov­er­ing that our bac­te­r­ial "en­dosym­bionts" are not as ge­net­i­cally con­ge­nial as we once thought they were. Not sur­pris­ing though, mi­to­chon­dria are de­scen­dants of ma­rine al­phapro­teobac­te­ria which are still among the most suc­cess­ful sea-far­ing preda­tors on Earth.

Fig­ure 2. TEM of hu­man mi­to­chon­dria. Source

Early on, al­phapro­teobac­te­ria evolved bio­chem­i­cal tricks en­abling them to thrive in an oxy­gen-rich world and be­gan prey­ing on other less meta­bol­i­cally gifted cells. Then, about 1.5 bil­lion years ago, an en­ter­pris­ing al­phapro­teobac­terium em­bed­ded it­self in an ar­chaeon — this be­ing the most cher­ished sce­nario — and, in or­der to fur­ther ex­ploit their hosts, its ver­ti­cally trans­mit­ted daugh­ter cells be­came less vir­u­lent over time.

Even­tu­ally both preda­tor and prey rec­og­nized the re­la­tion­ship as mu­tu­ally ben­e­fi­cial and the lit­tle al­phapro­teobac­terium be­came an 'en­dosym­biont.' Once cells ac­quired an in­ter­nal power source — a bac­terium that gen­er­ates ATP (adeno­sine triphos­phate), biology's uni­ver­sal fuel — they were bound to be­come larger and more com­plex; in other words, eu­kary­otic. With­out this sin­gu­lar event of a rel­a­tively "tame" al­phapro­teobac­terium in­vad­ing a re­cep­tive ar­chaeon, the Earth would still be wholly and solely in­hab­ited by sin­gle cells. Even more amaz­ing, be­cause eu­kary­otic cells ap­pear to have evolved only once, all true mul­ti­cel­lu­lar or­gan­isms on Earth — plants, an­i­mals, fungi, and al­gae — are re­lated.

Fig­ure 3. De­fense against pro­tein dam­age. Stress-dam­aged pro­teins that form ag­gre­gates in cells can be re­ac­ti­vated with the Hsp104-Ssa-Ydj1 chap­er­one ma­chin­ery. Mca1 may act in par­al­lel by bind­ing to mis­folded pro­teins dur­ing early stages of ag­gre­ga­tion for pro­tea­so­mal degra­da­tion (this is in­de­pen­dent of Mca1's en­zy­matic ac­tiv­ity). Al­ter­na­tively, Mca1 may as­so­ciate with mis­folded pro­teins formed at late stages of ag­gre­ga­tion (to­gether with Hsp104 and Ssa), help­ing to dis­en­tan­gle the ag­gre­gates by its pro­tease cleav­age ac­tiv­ity be­fore shunt­ing them to the pro­tea­some for degra­da­tion. Source

How­ever, the orig­i­nal al­phapro­teobac­terium that in­vaded and set up shop in an ar­chaeon might not have been so tame af­ter all. Dou­glas Green at St. Jude Children's Re­search Hos­pi­tal in Mem­phis con­jec­tures that the first proto-mi­to­chon­drion might have car­ried lethal bag­gage into its new host in the form of a "killer cas­sette;" a plas­mid car­ry­ing genes for a pore-form­ing toxin and an­other for its an­ti­dote. "Such mo­bile genes are com­mon to­day and likely long-used weapons for hunters like al­phapro­teobac­te­ria," he notes."If, as it's widely be­lieved, most mi­to­chon­dr­ial genes that weren't just thrown in the bi­o­log­i­cal trash bin were trans­ferred to the host nu­cleus, then the stress-in­duced tox­ins gen­er­ated by these nu­clear mi­to­chon­dr­ial genes would be aimed at the near­est bac­terium — a cy­to­plas­mic mi­to­chon­drion, rup­tur­ing its outer mem­brane and caus­ing a cell-killing bioen­er­getic cat­a­stro­phe."

Thus, the cell death mi­to­chon­dria are re­puted to en­force isn't as al­tru­is­tic as has gen­er­ally been thought and, in fact, bioen­er­getic cat­a­stro­phe looks more like mur­der than sui­cide. But the whole nasty busi­ness re­leases cy­tochrome c from the mi­to­chon­dr­ial in­ter-mem­brane and this sets off apop­to­sis which, in con­trast to en­er­getic cat­a­stro­phe is fast and ef­fi­cient; an as­set in the de­fense against in­tra­cel­lu­lar par­a­sites. New find­ings from Thomas Nyström's lab at the Uni­ver­sity of Gothen­burg in Swe­den also chal­lenge the idea that cells sac­ri­fice them­selves to pro­vide nu­tri­ents for younger and fit­ter com­mu­nity mem­bers. Their work with the yeast Sac­cha­romyces cere­visiae "sug­gest that from an evo­lu­tion­ary per­spec­tive, cas­pase ac­ti­va­tion is a pro­tec­tive re­sponse that helps cells sur­vive the toxic stress caused by mis­folded pro­teins," com­ments Harm Kampinga from the Uni­ver­sity of Gronin­gen in the Nether­lands. When ac­ti­vated too strongly the cas­pase ac­tiv­ity can be­come non­s­e­lec­tive and re­sult in pro­grammed cell death.

What's more, hav­ing sep­a­rate genomes within the same cell is ask­ing for trou­ble. Nat­ural se­lec­tion can force mi­to­chon­dria to fight among them­selves as well as against the host with no con­sid­er­a­tion of the long-term con­se­quences, says Nick Lane of Uni­ver­sity Col­lege, Lon­don. There are tens to hun­dreds of mi­to­chon­dria swim­ming around in a sin­gle cell and they all di­vide in­de­pen­dently of­fer­ing am­ple op­por­tu­nity for con­flict.

Fig­ure 4. Ac­tive and pas­sive cell deaths. Source

An at­tempt to avoid ge­netic con­flicts may be a rea­son that most mi­to­chon­dria are in­her­ited from one rather than both par­ents; usu­ally the mother, putting male mi­to­chon­dria at an evo­lu­tion­ary dead end. "Mi­to­chon­dr­ial genomes are un­der se­lec­tive pres­sure to pro­tect and en­hance fe­male in­ter­ests only," Ma­lik as­serts. "They can­not evolve in male-spe­cific ways and im­prove­ments will not be passed onto the next gen­er­a­tion." This might be a rea­son males seem to wear out sooner than fe­males and mi­to­chon­dr­ial dis­eases tend to be worse in men. Thus, Ma­lik pre­dicts "an even­tual tran­si­tion from sym­bio­sis to sex­ual con­flict" as male mi­to­chon­dria fight for their right­ful place in ge­nomic evo­lu­tion.

 

*This ar­ti­cle is ded­i­cated to Richard Dawkins who some­how fig­ured all this out be­fore the tech­nol­ogy was avail­able to even sug­gest it. True ge­nius.

 

Ref­er­ences

Daugh­erty, M. D. and Ma­lik, H. S. (2012) Rules of en­gage­ment: mol­e­c­u­lar in­sights from host-virus arms races. (Re­view) Ann. Rev. Genet.46: 677–700.

Feschotte, C. and Gilbert, C. (2012) En­doge­nous viruses: in­sights into vi­ral evo­lu­tion and im­pact on host bi­ol­ogy. (Re­view) Na­ture Re­views Ge­net­ics.13: 283–296.

Ben­der, C.E., Fitzger­ald, P., Tait, S.W.G., Llambi, F., Mc­Stay, G.P., Tup­per, D.O., Pel­let­tieri, J., Al­varado, A.S., Salvesen. G.S., Green, D.R. (2012) Mi­to­chon­dr­ial path­way of apop­to­sis is an­ces­tral in meta­zoans. Proc­Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(13):4904–4909.

Henikoff, S. and Ma­lik, H. S. (2002) Cen­tromeres: Self­ish dri­vers. (Con­cept) Na­ture 417: 227. 22.

Le, P.T., Pon­tarotti, P., Raoult, D. (2014) Al­phapro­teobac­te­ria species as a source and tar­get of lat­eral se­quence trans­fers.Cell 22:147–155.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24461455

Pa­tel, M. R., Emer­man, M., Ma­lik, H. S. (2011) Pa­le­ovi­rol­ogy — Ghosts and gifts of viruses past.Cur­rOpin­Vi­rol. 1 (4): 304–309

Malm­gren Hill, S. Hao, X., Bei­dong, L. , et al. (2014)  Life-span ex­ten­sion buy meta­cas­pase in the yeast Sac­cha­romyces cere­visiae. Sci­ence 344 (6190):1389–1392.

Kampinga, H.H. (2014) A cell death av­enue evolved from a life-sav­ing path. Sci­ence 344 (6190):1341- 1342.

Lane, Nick (2005) Power, Sex, Sui­cide: Mi­to­chon­dria and the Mean­ing of Life. Ox­ford Uni­ver­sity Press, New York.

Doug Green's Book: Means to an End: Apop­to­sis and Other Cell Death Mech­a­nisms (2011) Cold Spring Har­bor Press.

Car­roll, Lewis(1879) Through the Look­ing-Glass and What Al­ice Found There. Books of Won­der. William Mor­row & Co., Inc. New York. ISBN 0688–12049‑0: p. 42. "2 The Gar­den of Live Flow­ers". P. 46 (in link).

Green DRVic­tor B. (2012) The pan­theon of the fallen: why are there so many forms of cell death? Trends Cell Biol. 22:555–6.

 

Marcia Stone

Mar­cia Stone is a sci­ence writer based in New York City.

 

Other Posts

  • Fos­sil Fats

    by Tanja Bosak — In the be­gin­ning, there were fats, and in the end, only fats will re­main. This is, in sim­ple words, the ba­sis of a new field of re­search: the study of mol­e­c­u­lar fos­sils. Mol­e­c­u­lar fos­sils are rem­nants of the ac­tual lipid mol­e­cules that formed the cell mem­branes of an­cient or­gan­isms. Be­cause all or­gan­isms have mem­branes, most old fats may not tell us any­thing more than...

  • A Mi­cro­bial Utopia: Cheese

    by Nathan Jayne, Amanda Alker, and Nathalie Del­herbe — Over the past decade, there have been many large scale at­tempts to char­ac­ter­ize bac­te­r­ial com­mu­ni­ties, from soil and ocean mi­cro­bio­mes to hu­man mi­cro­bio­mes. There is even a col­lec­tive ef­fort to pro­file the Earth's mi­cro­biome. Sci­en­tists are not only in­ter­ested in know­ing who is there and what they are do­ing, but also how...

  • Why CRISPR Doesn't Work in E. coli

    by Elio — We re­ceived this query: "I en­joyed the ar­ti­cle on your blog 'Six Ques­tions About CRISPRs' by Merry Youle. I am an ex-lamb­dol­o­gist, hav­ing quit phage lambda in the early 70s and moved to GM-plants. There is one thing about CRISPR that I do not un­der­stand: Why did lamb­dol­o­gists not find CRISPR? They found phage..."

  • New Bug in Old Bot­tles

    by Christoph — "For bev­er­age pack­ag­ing the bar­rier prop­er­ties [= very low per­me­abil­ity] of the PET to cer­tain gases, the ex­cel­lent mass to strength ra­tio and the re­cy­cla­bil­ity of the fi­nal prod­uct are very im­por­tant fea­tures in­flu­enc­ing the choice of PET over other plas­tics or more tra­di­tional pack­ag­ing ma­te­ri­als." (quoted from the essentialchemicalindustry.org web­site). Given such at­trac­tive fea­tures, it's no won­der...

  • Swim­ming by the Light of the Sun

    by Merry Youle —Ma­rine bac­te­ria have been much in the news of late, and right­fully so. There are many of them (an es­ti­mated 10 to the 29th to­tal), they oc­cupy spe­cific lo­cal niches in the seas, and they carry out di­verse (and some­times pre­vi­ously un­known) ac­tiv­i­ties. A case in point: some of them har­vest en­ergy from the sun via a sys­tem other than...

  • A Fly in the Frozen Cus­tard

    by Elio — Don't you just love a good con­tro­versy? Take, for in­stance, the dis­cus­sions on long term sur­vival of bac­te­ria. De­pend­ing on your point of view, bac­te­ria ex­ist in salt for­ma­tions go­ing back 250 mil­lion years, in 50 mil­lion year old am­ber, or in 500,00 year old per­ma­nently frozen ice or per­mafrost. Some re­searchers re­port the iso­la­tion of vi­able bac­te­ria, oth­ers are con­tent...