Talmudic Question #101
How many cells does it take to make a biofilm?
Other Posts
Small Friends of Fungi
by Bob Mesibov — If you studied the traditional sort of biology, you're probably carrying around an unfortunate prejudice. You see terrestrial habitats as a simplified nutrients-and-energy pyramid. At the bottom are green plants, feeding on sunlight, carbon dioxide and soil water and minerals. Next layer up on the pyramid is...
A Masterpiece of Bacterial Structure
by Elio — Terry Beveridge of Guelph University died recently. We regret the loss of this outstanding structural microbiologist who made stellar contributions to varied topics such as the structure of the S‑layer, the interaction of microbial surfaces with metals and antibiotics, bacterial cell division, Gram stain and...
Talmudic Question #45
What do you think are the most interesting unsolved questions in E. coli and Salmonella research?
Beyond the Bacterial Microcompartment
by Merry Youle — Bacterial microcompartments were a great innovation. As Alan Derman explained, these protein-bounded structures assist with diverse metabolic processes by housing the requisite enzymes along with their substrates, sequestering potentially toxic intermediates, and allowing the products to exit. But the story does not end there. Enter the nanocompartment…
Talmudic Question #206
by Roberto — Two recent events prompt me to post this (double) Talmudic Question(s). First, I had a lot of thoughts inspired by Christoph's Monday post on stop codons being recognized by charged tRNAs in a trypanosomatid: "Stops making sense." How bizarre can non-canonical codes get? Second, I was reading posts from the past.
Talmudic Question #210
The endosymbiosis of a cyanobacterium led to the formation of the photosynthetic organelle, the chloroplast. Along evolutionary history this organelle proved quite plastic; there are many non-photosynthetic variants with very different functions...
I would say a couple of thousands. My reason is the DBL — the diffusive boundary layer — since it takes several thousands of cells of bacteria to form enough surface area that would be affecting significant mass transfer of chemical species.
This is a chicken and egg question now, since you could always ask me: what is "significant" mass transfer? good question, I would answer. I think it depends on the ecological niche. if it is the sea, than a biofilm of 1 cm^2 do nothing to the oceans mass transfer. If it is a small flow cell than... well you get what Im saying
2 cells: one cell to attach to a surface and the other to attach to the first cell.
Or perhaps a single cell biofilm; just a cell attached to a surface producing LPS.
It only takes one cell to create a biofilm. For instance, colony biofilms arise from a single cell on a plate. Or is the question how many cells have to be present to be considered a biofilm? A biofilm is defined as a community of bacteria (as well as eDNA, proteins, exopolysaccharides etc.). So how many cells have to be present to be considered a community?
"It takes two to party" doesn't hold for bugs, i fear. In the known cases the biofilm party only gets started if enough planctonic bugs around crave for party (quorum sensing) loud enough. So it takes probably more the equivalent to a well populated disco...
None. Assuming a broader definition of life, a self replicating biopolymer, such as a ribozyme, with an affinity for a nearby surface would suffice.
According to Talmudic law it would be ten adult bacteria. . .
Does one bacterium a population make? If 'yes' then one microbe can be a biofilm. If 'No' then two bacteria can be a biofilm (with the caveat that the two must be within 'communicable' distance of each other). Presuming a biofilm represents a viable population of microbes on a surface which resist removal.
Same as the number of neurons it takes to make a brain.
–bks