The Lyme Dis­ease Spiro­chete Feasts on Tick An­tifreeze

This ar­ti­cle is lightly mod­i­fied from one pub­lished in the blog Spiro­chetes Un­wound by Mi­crobe Fan.With kind per­mis­sion of the au­thor.

by Mi­crobe Fan

In the north­east­ern United States the Lyme dis­ease spiro­chete Bor­re­lia burgdor­feri spreads from one white-footed mouse to an­other by hitch­ing a ride in the deer tick Ixodes scapu­laris. Trans­mis­sion be­tween tick and mouse oc­curs dur­ing the tick's rare blood meals. The lar­val tick ac­quires B. burgdor­feri from an in­fected mouse dur­ing a blood meal late in the sum­mer, and the spiro­chetes take up shel­ter in the tick's midgut. Later the larva molts into a nymph, which then com­pletes the trans­mis­sion cy­cle by feed­ing on an un­in­fected mouse dur­ing the next spring or early sum­mer.

The deer tick, Ixodes scapu­laris. Photo: Scott Bauer, USDA Agri­cul­tural Re­search Ser­vice, Bugwood.org. Source

Al­though blood is po­ten­tially a rich source of nu­tri­ents for both tick and spiro­chete, the cells lin­ing the tick's gut rapidly en­gulf the nu­tri­ents, in­clud­ing glu­cose, an en­ergy-rich sugar fa­vored by B. burgdor­feri. The spiro­chetes must there­fore rely on other en­ergy sources if they are to sur­vive the many months be­tween tick feed­ings. How does B. burgdor­feri fuel its sur­vival dur­ing this pe­riod?

A study in the July is­sue of PLoS Pathogens has shown that B. burgdor­feri me­tab­o­lizes the tick's an­tifreeze while liv­ing in its midgut. Many arthro­pods and in­sects pro­duce large amounts of an­tifreeze to pro­tect them­selves from freez­ing tem­per­a­tures. The Ixodes tick's an­tifreeze is glyc­erol, the same stuff that's of­ten added to en­zymes to keep them from freez­ing in lab­o­ra­tory freez­ers. The amount of glyc­erol found in other or­gan­isms is too low to serve as an­tifreeze. I de­scribe be­low how B. burgdor­feri han­dles glyc­erol, but the same en­zymes are found in most or­gan­isms that me­tab­o­lize glyc­erol, in­clud­ing hu­mans.

Mod­i­fied from Fig­ure 1 of Pap­pas et al., 2011. The BB num­bers are the gene ID num­bers as­signed when the B. burgdor­feri genome was se­quenced. The in­di­vid­ual steps of gly­col­y­sis are not shown. Source

The B. burgdor­feri genome en­codes ho­mologs of a glyc­erol trans­porter (GlpF), glyc­erol ki­nase (GlpK), and glyc­erol-3-phos­phate de­hy­dro­ge­nase (GlpD), which are used by the bac­te­ria to take up and me­tab­o­lize glyc­erol (see fig­ure). The fig­ure also shows that B. burgdor­feri can break down glu­cose by the gly­colytic path­way (gly­col­y­sis) to sup­ply its car­bon and en­ergy needs.

Af­ter the glyc­erol trans­porter brings glyc­erol into the cy­to­plasm, glyc­erol ki­nase (GlpK) quickly phos­pho­ry­lates glyc­erol at the ex­pense of ATP to gen­er­ate glyc­erol-3-phos­phate. Glyc­erol-3-phos­phate is lo­cated at a branch point in glyc­erol me­tab­o­lism. This key metabo­lite can be shunted to one of two path­ways. One path­way leads to as­sem­bly of lipids, and the other leads to the gly­colytic path­way, which gen­er­ates ATP for B. burgdor­feri. To make more lipids, ad­di­tional mol­e­cules are at­tached to glyc­erol-3-phos­phate by other en­zymes to gen­er­ate phos­pho­lipids, gly­col­ipids, and lipopro­teins. To gen­er­ate ATP, glyc­erol-3-phos­phate is con­verted by glyc­erol-3-phos­phate de­hy­dro­ge­nase (GlpD or G3PDH) into di­hy­drox­y­ace­tone phos­phate, which feeds into the mid­dle of the gly­colytic path­way.

For their study the in­ves­ti­ga­tors knocked out the B. burgdor­feri glpD gene en­cod­ing glyc­erol-3-phos­phate de­hy­dro­ge­nase so that the spiro­chete couldn't use glyc­erol as an en­ergy source to make ATP. As ex­pected, the glpD mu­tant was un­able to grow to a high cell den­sity when glyc­erol was the ma­jor car­bon and en­ergy source in the cul­ture medium. Nev­er­the­less the mu­tant was still able to in­fect lab­o­ra­tory mice and spread through­out their bod­ies al­most as well as the wild-type strain. This makes sense since en­ergy sources other than glyc­erol (such as glu­cose) are read­ily avail­able in mam­mals.

To see how well the glpD mu­tant sur­vived in ticks, lar­val Ixodes scapu­laris ticks were al­lowed to feed to sa­ti­a­tion on groups of mice in­fected with the mu­tant and wild-type strains. Sim­i­lar num­bers of the mu­tant and wild­type ended up in the lar­vae. The in­fected lar­vae were main­tained in the lab and al­lowed to molt into nymphs. At 7–8 weeks af­ter lar­val feed­ing, the num­ber of mu­tant spiro­chetes in the nymphs was 4–5 times lower than the num­ber of wild­type. This re­sult sug­gests that to thrive in the tick's midgut, B. burgdor­feri has to break down glyc­erol, the tick's an­tifreeze, to gen­er­ate ATP.

The glpD mu­ta­tion also slowed the rapid in­crease in spiro­chete num­bers seen when the in­fected nymph starts to feed on a mouse (see fig­ure). It's un­clear how many of the blood nu­tri­ents are avail­able to B. burgdor­feri early dur­ing feed­ing. Blood con­sump­tion by the tick is slow ini­tially, and a mem­brane called a per­itrophic ma­trix forms in the tick midgut to en­case the blood. The spiro­chetes in the midgut may there­fore rely pri­mar­ily on glyc­erol to power their rapid mul­ti­pli­ca­tion even as the nymph is feed­ing. Within a few days a small num­ber of spiro­chetes even­tu­ally break through the midgut lin­ing and make their way to the sali­vary glands, where they end up as pas­sen­gers in the saliva flow­ing into the mouse's skin.

Fig­ure 11 from Pap­pas et al., 2011. In­fected nymphs were placed on mice at time zero. Filled cir­cles, wild-type B. burgdor­feri; open squares, glpD mu­tant. Source

The im­paired growth of the glpD mu­tant in the feed­ing nymph also de­layed their trans­mis­sion into the mice. The nymphs fed for 62 hours be­fore the wild-type strain was trans­mit­ted to the mice, whereas 72 hours elapsed be­fore trans­mis­sion of the glpD mu­tant was de­tected.

Why does the glpD mu­tant sur­vive at all in the ticks? The an­swer is that there are prob­a­bly other en­ergy sources avail­able to B. burgdor­feri. The au­thors pro­posed that the sugar chi­to­biose, a com­po­nent of the tick's cu­ti­cle and per­itrophic mem­brane, can be con­sumed by B. burgdor­feri liv­ing in the midgut. The trans­porter en­coded by chbC brings chi­to­biose into the spiro­chete, where it is processed by sev­eral en­zymes be­fore be­ing fed into the gly­colytic path­way. In fact the au­thors found that B. burgdor­feri ex­pressed larger amounts of the chbC mRNA when in the un­fed nymph than it did when in the mouse host. This re­sult would be ex­pected if B. burgdor­feri was try­ing to me­tab­o­lize the tick's chi­to­biose, which is not found in the mouse.

So to sum things up, B. burgdor­feri ap­pears to use dif­fer­ent or­ganic car­bon sources to ful­fill its en­ergy needs de­pend­ing on where it's liv­ing. In the mouse host B. burgdor­feri most likely breaks down glu­cose, a sugar rich with po­ten­tial chem­i­cal en­ergy. Since glu­cose isn't avail­able in the tick, the spiro­chete con­sumes glyc­erol and pos­si­bly chi­to­biose while liv­ing in the tick's midgut.

 

Ref­er­ence

Pap­pas CJ, Iyer R, Pet­zke MM, Caimano MJ, Radolf JD, & Schwartz I (2011). Bor­re­lia burgdor­feri re­quires glyc­erol for max­i­mum fit­ness dur­ing the tick phase of the en­zootic cy­cle. PLoS pathogens, 7 (7). PMID 21750672

 

Other Posts

  • Re­play: On Teach­ing

    by Stan­ley Falkow — A grad­u­ate stu­dent came to my of­fice re­cently to say that she was in­creas­ingly both­ered by anx­i­ety and the 'ter­ror' of hav­ing to speak at lab­o­ra­tory meet­ings. She had also learned a month ago that she was ex­pected to lec­ture to a class or­ga­nized by her men­tor. The thought of…

  • Friend & Foe

    by Christoph — In a post two month ago, I re­ferred to 'de­fen­sive sym­bioses'. In a nut­shell: one or more sym­bi­otic bac­te­ria pro­duce a cock­tail of an­tibi­otics that pro­vide pro­tec­tion of a eu­kary­otic host against an ar­ray of op­por­tunis­tic bac­te­r­ial and fun­gal pathogens. I in­tro­duced the term not in con­trast but...

  • Biggest Flower, Biggest Gene Thief

    Who Would Have Thought? by Elio — Raf­fle­sias in the trop­i­cal rain forests of South­east Asia pro­duce some of the biggest flow­ers in the world, up to one me­ter in di­am­e­ter. They're not mi­crobes by anyone's de­f­i­n­i­tion of the term. Adding to their no­to­ri­ety is their car­rion-like smell to at­tract in­sects for pol­li­na­tion ser­vice. The rea­son they…

  • Fun­gal Alchemy: Us­ing Ra­di­a­tion as a Source of En­ergy

    by Elio — Ac­cus­tomed as we are to mi­cro­bial sur­prises, we were nonethe­less taken aback by a re­port dis­clos­ing that cer­tain fungi grow bet­ter when ex­posed to ion­iz­ing ra­di­a­tion. Ac­cord­ing to a pa­per from Al­bert Ein­stein Med­ical School, fungi can also use ra­di­a­tion as a source of energy─not ex­actly one's view of ra­di­a­tion as some­thing malev­o­lent and bane­ful.

  • Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion #28

    The eu­kary­otic nu­clear mem­brane is some­thing of a mys­te­ri­ous struc­ture and its ori­gins are the sub­ject of much de­bate. It would be in­ter­est­ing to hear a mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal view on the ques­tion: why is there a nu­clear mem­brane?

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
14 years ago

One of my fa­vorite pa­per. Thanks for shar­ing