Mi­cro­biopol­i­tics

by Elio

In an at­tempt to pre­serve and de­fend the good name of the salmon fished in his state, Sen­a­tor War­ren Mag­nu­son (D‑WA), in­tro­duced in 1967 a bill in the US Sen­ate pro­po­sing to change the name of Sal­mo­nella  to the more in­oc­cu­ous sound­ing Sanella. In some cir­cles it may seem com­for­ting to think that tax­o­nomic terms can be changed by an act of Con­gress. Who knows, that could come in han­dy some­day.

Salmo sp. (left) Sal­mo­nella en­ter­ica serovar Ty­phi­mu­ri­um (right)

The ASM re­sponded to the Mag­nu­son bill rather force­ful­ly. Be­low is part of a let­ter writ­ten by the chair of the ASM Tax­on­omy Com­mit­tee, William A. Clark.

I am re­minded of a pre­vi­ous at­tempt at leg­is­lat­ing sci­ence. In 1897, the In­di­ana State Leg­is­la­ture con­sid­ered a bill to change the value of Pi to a more man­age­able num­ber, 3.20 to be ex­act. The bill was en­ti­tled "A Bill for an act in­tro­duc­ing a new math­e­mat­i­cal truth and of­fered as a con­tri­bu­tion to ed­u­ca­tion to be used only by the State of In­di­ana free of cost by pay­ing any roy­al­ties what­ever on the same, pro­vided it is ac­cepted and adopted by the of­fi­cial ac­tion of the Leg­is­la­ture of 1897". The bill passed the state House but was re­jected by the state Sen­ate. Read its pic­turesque his­tory here.

Plus ça change...

 

I thank Jeff Karr, the ASM archivist, for kindly call­ing my at­ten­tion to the Mag­nu­son bill. Note that in 1969, the ASM Tax­o­nomic Com­mit­tee con­sid­ered Sal­mo­nella a "uni­cel­lu­lar, non-pho­to­syn­thetic plant" (last sen­tence). Click im­age to en­large...


Other Posts

  • An Epis­tle From the Past

    by Elio — I re­cently found a let­ter I re­ceived in 1955, giv­ing me ad­vice about where to ap­ply for a post­doc in Eu­rope. In those days, do­ing a post­doc in Eu­rope was nearly de rigueur for young Amer­i­cans who wanted to fol­low an aca­d­e­mic ca­reer. I'm not en­tirely clear what the rea­son was, as there were plenty of front-line labs ac­tive in mol­e­c­u­lar bi­ol­ogy in the US. Surely the joy­ful prospect of a year or two abroad played a big role.

  • An­drew Wright (1935−2023)

    by Roberto — This past Oc­to­ber 9th, mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy lost an ex­tra­or­di­nary mem­ber when An­drew Wright died. Those of us for­tu­nate to have in­ter­acted with him over the years lost a very good friend. Even on a first meet­ing it was im­pos­si­ble not to sense his kind­ness and gen­uine in­ter­est in the con­ver­sa­tion, un­der­scored by his gen­tle smile and an en­dear­ing Scot­tish ac­cent.

  • Lost & Found #3

    By Christoph — If you want to leave 𝕏 (for­merly Twit­ter) for any rea­son, you can de­ac­ti­vate or com­pletely delete your ac­count. That's it then. But if you want to take a few still in­ter­est­ing book­marks with you when you move out, well, then the 𝕏o­dus takes a lit­tle longer. Here are three more of these sal­vaged book­marks, in 'Lost & Found #3'.

  • The Ecol­ogy of Louis Pas­teur

    by Elio — Pas­teur is as close to be­ing the fa­ther of our sci­ence as it gets, with Robert Koch a close con­tender. Both made fun­da­men­tal con­tri­bu­tions, best re­mem­bered for their elu­ci­da­tion of the mi­cro­bial ori­gin of in­fec­tious dis­eases. The two came to it from rather dif­fer­ent points of view and the con­trast be­tween them...