The Early Days of Re­stric­tion En­zymes

Re­cently, I met up with John Collins who, in col­lab­o­ra­tion with Bar­bara Hohn, in­vented cos­mids in 1978. We took de­light in rem­i­nisc­ing about the early days of re­com­bi­nant DNA. A few days af­ter our meet­ing, John of­fered this de­light­ful telling of the story of one par­tic­u­lar re­stric­tion en­zyme. —Roberto

by John Collins

In the early 1960s, Werner Ar­ber in Switzer­land dis­cov­ered that for­eign DNA en­ter­ing a bac­te­r­ial cell could be cleaved on both strands by re­stric­tion en­donu­cle­ases (re­stric­tion en­zymes). This was part of the host's de­fense against vi­ral at­tack. For this dis­cov­ery he shared the 1978 No­bel Prize with Hamil­ton Smith and Daniel Nathans. Smith and Nathans had in turn dis­cov­ered re­stric­tion en­zymes from Haemophilus in­fluen­zae and shown by Smith to rec­og­nize spe­cific se­quences and cleave SV40 vi­ral DNA into many spe­cific frag­ments that could be sep­a­rated and vi­su­al­ized (if la­belled with 32P) us­ing poly­acry­lamide gel elec­trophore­sis. They pre­dicted that these en­zymes would be use­ful for gen­er­at­ing small DNA frag­ments for DNA se­quenc­ing. Not only did these unique en­zymes greatly fa­cil­i­tate se­quenc­ing, but they also helped usher in the era of DNA cloning – ini­ti­ated by Herb Boyer, Stan Co­hen and col­leagues in 1973 – and aided in the dis­cov­ery of RNA splic­ing in 1977, through the in­de­pen­dent work of Phil Sharp and Rich Roberts and their teams (No­bel Prize 1993).

Roberts re­al­ized the enor­mous po­ten­tial of re­stric­tion en­zymes and en­gaged many of the sci­en­tific com­mu­nity to search for more. Con­se­quently, dur­ing the 1970s many sci­en­tists were dis­cov­er­ing and pu­ri­fy­ing many new re­stric­tion en­zymes from di­verse bac­te­ria in the labs and swap­ping or do­nat­ing aliquots of these with col­leagues at other in­sti­tutes. We at the Na­tional Cen­ter for Biotech­no­log­i­cal Re­search in Braun­schweig, Ger­many, rou­tinely made SmaI from Ser­ra­tia marcescens, and EcoRI (from Herb Boyer's Es­cherichia coli strain). In 1974 Don­ald Comb founded New Eng­land Bi­o­labs (NEB) with close con­nec­tions to sev­eral sci­en­tists. The de­clared in­ten­tion was to sup­ply re­search ma­te­ri­als and then plough some of the prof­its back into acad­e­mia. Rich Roberts be­came in­volved in NEB as Chief Sci­en­tific Of­fi­cer. For tak­ing on this post, Roberts ini­tially got a lot of crit­i­cism since "en­tre­pre­neur" was a dirty word for life sci­en­tists in those days, taint­ing his or her rep­u­ta­tion. I had more than my share of that when my in­sti­tute wanted to patent the cos­mid-cloning tech­nique 1977.

Fig. 1. Edge of a liv­ing colony of Caryo­phanon la­tum in­cu­bated for 24 hr. at 26°C. The fil­a­ments are closely sub­di­vided by nu­mer­ous cross-walls. The two re­frac­tile bi­con­cave seg­ments in the cen­tral fil­a­ment are dis­in­te­grated cells, × 1700. Source

An amus­ing anec­dote from this time oc­curred to a col­league of mine. Hu­bert Mayer, who was teach­ing a bi­ol­ogy course at the lo­cal Uni­ver­sity in Braun­schweig. He ini­ti­ated a search for re­stric­tion en­zymes in novel or­gan­isms. One of the or­gan­isms was Caryo­phanum la­tum, a very large bac­terium iso­lated from cow-dung that in­evitably lysed when it reached sta­tionary phase in lab­o­ra­tory cul­ture. To Hubert's amaze­ment, the crude su­per­natants of the lysed cul­tures con­tained no non-spe­cific nu­cle­ases. Rather, these su­per­natants con­tained a sin­gle re­stric­tion en­donu­cle­ase, which by con­ven­tion was called ClaI. This enzyme's cleav­age pat­tern of lambda DNA clearly im­plied it had a com­pletely new speci­ficity. In­deed, ClaI cut the widely used cloning vec­tor pBR322 at a sin­gle site be­tween the tetra­cy­cline re­sis­tance pro­moter and the struc­tural gene, mak­ing it very use­ful for cloning. We of­fered NEB the strain for their com­mer­cial use ask­ing for a cou­ple of thou­sand Ger­man marks (about US$700 at the time) to go back into our re­search fund. NEB said they didn't want to pay for the strain. And yet, they asked us for all the de­tails as to how to pre­pare the growth me­dia and every­thing re­lated to cul­ti­vat­ing this fas­tid­i­ous bac­terium. Turns out, the sim­plest-to-make and most of­ten used medium was pre­pared from the bacterium's nat­ural habi­tat. That is why Hu­bert brought cow-dung to the lab every morn­ing to pre­pare the growth medium! We in­formed NEB of the medium com­po­si­tion and our way of prepar­ing it. They ap­par­ently thought we were jok­ing and try­ing to take the Mickey out of them. Writ­ing back (peo­ple wrote let­ters in those days!), NEB replied "…if we give any­one any money, it will be the farm­ers."  They took our C. la­tum strain any­way, never giv­ing us any funds. Yet, I am sure they prof­ited; in 2015, NEB was val­ued at US$ 1.6 bil­lion.

 

Do you want to com­ment on this post? We would be happy about it! Please send us an email, or com­ment on Mastodon, or on Bluesky.

 

 

John Collins (born 1945) pi­o­neer in gene tech­nol­ogy, co-founder of HUGO; in­tro­duced gene tech­nol­ogy to Den­mark and Ger­many (1974/5); re­tired Pro­fes­sor at Uni­ver­sity of Braun­schweig and the GBF (now HZI) Braun­­schweig; since 2012 sci­ence his­to­rian. Self por­trait: a cur­mud­geon brim­ming with un­told tales of aca­d­e­mic, civil ser­vant and in­dus­trial hyp­ocrits.
 

 

Other Posts

  • Sci­en­tific Pub­lish­ing – eLife's Re­viewed Preprints

    by Roberto — Just over five years ago, George O'Toole and I had a con­ver­sa­tion about sci­en­ti­fic pub­lish­ing which we posted at STC. Af­ter some harsh com­ments cri­tiqu­ing for-pro­­fit sci­en­ti­fic pub­lish­ers, jour­nal im­pact fac­tors, and pre­da­to­ry jour­nals, we turned to think­ing about so­lu­tions. George in­di­cat­ed some guard­ed...

  • Never a Dull En­zyme

    by Roberto — The tri­car­boxylic acid cy­cle en­zyme cit­rate syn­thase from Syne­chococ­cus elon­ga­tus has the re­mark­able fea­ture that it self-as­sem­bles into mul­ti­meric frac­tal shapes, specif­i­cally Sier­piński tri­an­gles. As Arthur Ko­rn­berg would have said: "Never a dull en­zyme!"...

  • Er­ror Bars

    by Elio — Er­ror bars in his­tograms re­mind me of det­o­na­tors used to set off ex­plo­sives. I am tempted to ask: "What would hap­pen if you pushed down the plunger?" You see, in the old days peo­ple used to show the whole er­ror bar, not just the half stick­ing out of the top. I'm still get­ting used to them, but...

  • A Few Thoughts About the 2012 San Fran­cisco ASM Gen­eral Meet­ing

    by Elio — I re­cently re­turned from the ASM yearly gen­eral meet­ing in San Fran­cisco. It hap­pens to be 61 years, no less, since I at­tended my first such event, that one in Chicago. In those days, many mem­bers at­tended a gi­ant ban­quet as part of the event, I well re­mem­ber. As a poor grad­u­ate stu­dent…

  • On Sto­ries and Sci­ence, Plus Fish

    by Janie — It's prob­a­bly fair to say that peo­ple, when afraid, turn to sto­ries and to sci­ence for so­lace. The last year and a half has so­lid­i­fied that: the yarns spun range from con­spir­acy the­o­ries to es­capist nov­els that trans­port the reader far, far away from bleaker re­al­i­ties (The Mid­night Li­brary phe­nom­e­non, any­one?)...

  • On Find­ing Jew­els in the Junk

    by Christoph Weigel — In prokary­otes, it only takes a small jazz band to get the mu­sic groov­ing: pi­ano and a rhythm sec­tion suf­fice. The pro­moter re­gion of a gene is a tiny stage on which RNA poly­merase ℗ and few tran­scrip­tion fac­tors (dr, b) im­pro­vise on a tune, i.e. they ini­ti­ate or skip tran­scrip­tion. By con­trast, it takes a big band in eu­kary­otes to per­form Duke Ellington's 'Car­a­van'. And since not all the mu­si­cians...