A two-part res­ur­rec­tion tale (2|2)

by Christoph

In con­tin­u­a­tion of the first part of the tale: what is the "res­ur­rec­tion" in the ti­tle about? A bit of nos­tal­gia, as I will "res­ur­rect" a story that is based on re­search from ~30 years ago (and to­day mainly known by ded­i­cated plas­mid spe­cial­ists, if at all). A sim­ple but vex­ing ques­tion both­ered re­searchers study­ing con­ju­ga­tion: how could genes trans­ferred from a con­juga­tive plas­mid into a re­cip­i­ent cell be ex­pressed so quickly, that is, within min­utes, as their time-course ex­per­i­ments showed? That is, well be­fore the plas­mid trans­fer was com­plete and the trans­ferred DNA still sin­gle-stranded.

Time‑staggered ex­pres­sion of "early," "mid­dle" and "late" genes was al­ready well known back then from bac­te­rio­phages, for ex­am­ple from E. coli phage T7. The seg­ment of the lin­ear T7 chro­mo­some that first en­ters the host cy­to­plasm upon in­fec­tion car­ries the "early" genes that are tran­scribed by the host RNA poly­merase. This seg­ment car­ries seven genes, among them the gene for a re­stric­tion in­hibitor (gp0.3) and the gene for T7 RNA poly­merase (gp1) (see here for a con­cise ex­plainer). Yet, T7 DNA is double‑stranded and the three ma­jor early pro­mot­ers are read­ily re­cog­nized by the host RNA poly­merase. Could single‑stranded DNA trig­ger tran­scrip­tion in the case of con­juga­tive plas­mids?

Fig­ure 3. Pro­posed sec­ondary struc­ture of ssFrpo and a pos­si­ble mode of recog­ni­tion by RNA poly­merase. Nuc­leotides pro­tected from DNase I di­ges­tion are in­di­cated by gray (for RNA poly­merase) and by striped (SSB) box­es. Gray and black ar­rows in­di­cate, re­spec­tively, the po­sition of the ma­jor 59 end of the primer RNA synthe­sized in the pu­ri­fied sys­tem and that of the tran­si­tion site from RNA to DNA in the crude ex­tract. The ar­rows in­dicate the di­rec­tion of transcription/DNA chain elon­gation. The residues sen­si­tive to P1 nu­cle­ase near the top of the stem are cir­cled. Pu­ta­tive −10 and −35 se­quen­ces are boxed. Source

The an­swer is: yes, it can, but there's a twist. In 1997, Hisao Ma­sai and Ken-ichi Arai from the Uni­ver­sity of Tokyo, Japan, pub­lished in Cell  their find­ing of "Frpo : A Novel Sin­gle-Stranded DNA Pro­moter for Tran­scrip­tion and for Primer RNA Syn­the­sis of DNA Repli­ca­tion." The first part of the ti­tle of their pa­per is im­por­tant here, but their study started with the lat­ter: dur­ing char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of ssi, the ge­net­i­cally iden­ti­fied single‑strand repli­ca­tion ori­gin of the (con­ju­gative) F plas­mid, they found a novel prim­ing sig­nal for DNA repli­ca­tion. Primer RNA syn­the­sis on ssi is me­di­ated by RNA poly­merase and, there­fore, they des­ig­nated it Frpo. In the pres­ence of SSB, RNA poly­merase ef­fi­ciently ini­ti­ates tran­scrip­tion at a spe­cific site on ss­DNA con­tain­ing Frpo, and RNAs are elon­gated into DNA chains by DNA Pol III holoen­zyme. For the first part of the ti­tle: Frpo ap­pears to also pro­vide tran­scripts for down­stream open read­ing frames (ORFs) of the F plas­mid since the tran­scrip­tion ini­ti­a­tion site on Frpo iden­ti­fied in vitro is iden­ti­cal to that pre­vi­ously lo­cal­ized in vivo for these ORFs (whose iden­tity was not known then but is now. One of them, PsiB, is an in­hibitor of the SOS re­sponse, that is, an "anti-de­fense" gene). Hall­mark of the single‑stranded Frpo pro­moter – and the "twist" I men­tioned ear­lier – is an extend­ed fold­back or stem-loop struc­ture that con­tains, within the double‑stranded DNA stem, the canon­i­cal –35 and –10 el­e­ments of bac­te­r­ial pro­moters (Fig­ure 3). The ob­ser­va­tion that RNA poly­merase holoen­zyme (αββ'ω+σ70) is ac­tive in in vitro tran­scrip­tion from Frpo while core RNA poly­merase (αββ'ω) is not sup­ports the as­sign­ment of the –35 and –10 el­e­ments since the σ70 sub­unit con­fers pro­moter speci­ficity to RNA poly­merase. On double‑stranded DNA, Frpo is tran­scrip­tion­ally in­ac­tive in ­vitro, but ac­tive on de­na­tured, that is, sin­gle-stranded DNA cov­ered with sin­gle strand‑binding pro­tein (SSB), which is thought to sta­bi­lize the stem-loop struc­ture (and cer­tainly pre­vents re‑annealing of the DNA strands).

Frpo-type pro­mot­ers were de­tected not much later by Bates et al. (1999) in the ssi re­gion of the con­juga­tive plas­mid ColIb-P9 (see here). To­day we know – not least from the study by Samuel & Burstein (2023) – that ss­DNA pro­mot­ers of the Frpo type are abun­dant in DNA el­e­ments such as plas­mids (and phages) that are tran­siently sin­gle-stranded. To my knowl­edge, Frpo-type pro­mot­ers have not yet been found in Ar­chaea or Eukary­otes. For me, it is a joy to see that a branch of ex­per­i­men­tal re­search that ini­tially seemed to be rather ec­cen­tric, al­most wacky, and clearly more of a niche pur­suit, has in the long run con­tributed to a bet­ter un­der­stand­ing of wide­spread processes.

 

Do you want to com­ment on this post? We would be happy about it! Please com­ment on Mastodon or on Buesky.
 

Other Posts

  • Ter­mi­nal Pro­teins: End­less Pos­si­bil­i­ties

    by Merry — Al­though it is far from unan­i­mous, the great ma­jor­ity of phages stud­ied so far pack­age their genomes for in­ter­cel­lu­lar space travel as lin­ear chro­mo­somes. Why lin­ear rather than cir­cu­lar? Pack­ag­ing con­ve­nience, for one thing. Many phages, in­clud­ing all of the tailed phages, pack­age their chro­mo­somes into pre­assem­bled icosa­he­dral pro­cap­sids through a por­tal lo­cated...

  • A Shin­ing Mys­tery

    by Elio — Who wouldn't agree how enor­mously grat­i­fy­ing it would be to make eco­log­i­cal sense of every lab find­ing, to see how the phe­nom­e­non be­ing ob­served fits with the organism's life out­side the lab. Sounds easy?

  • A Bac­terium Learns Long Di­vi­sion

    by Nanne Nan­ninga — The com­mon pic­ture of a di­vid­ing rod-shaped bac­terium en­com­passes the po­si­tion­ing of the di­vi­some, in­clud­ing an FtsZ-ring, in the cell cen­ter. This oc­curs af­ter the cell has dou­bled its length with­out in­creas­ing its di­am­e­ter. Con­versely, in­crease in di­am­e­ter with­out cell elon­ga­tion would seem highly un­likely in a rod-shaped…

  • Cir­ca­dian Rhythms Re­vis­ited...

    (and maybe even ex­plained!) by Elio — The very first item in this blog was about the cir­ca­dian rhythm in cyanobac­te­ria. We cel­e­brated the amaz­ing find­ing by a group from Nagoya Uni­ver­sity that the 24-hour cir­ca­dian clock of Syne­chococ­cus elon­ga­tus PCC7942 can be re­con­sti­tuted in vitro with just three pu­ri­fied pro­teins in the pres­ence of ATP.

  • Feel de­hy­drated? Dig for some wa­ter then!

    by Christoph — Cyanobac­te­ria of the genus Chro­oco­cci­diop­sis are known to sur­vive harsh en­vi­ron­men­tal con­di­tions, high and low tem­pe­ra­tures, ion­izing ra­dia­tion, and high sa­li­ni­ty. Add re­sist­an­ce to de­hy­dra­tion or, in the ex­treme form, de­sic­ca­tion and you have a se­ri­ous chal­len­ger of Dei­no­coc­cus to the ti­tle "champ­ion of re­sil­ience". Like the lat­ter, Chro­oco­cci­diop­sis is ea­si­ly found in the Ata­ca­ma de­sert...