We re­mem­ber Tom Brock

by Elio

Tom Brock (Sep­tem­ber 10, 1926 − April 4, 2021) can read­ily be con­sid­ered the fa­ther of extremo­phile mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy. He pi­o­neered the study of high tem­per­a­ture-lov­ing mi­crobes, by in­ves­ti­gat­ing, in a nearly frol­ic­some way, the hot springs of Yel­low­stone Park. He car­ried out this work pretty much alone, with both ex­per­i­men­tal in­ge­nu­ity and con­cep­tual gusto, lay­ing down the ba­sis for a new way to ap­pre­ci­ate the mi­cro­bial world. He also wrote a trail­blaz­ing text­book, Bi­ol­ogy of Micro­organisms (which other au­thors car­ried through 15 edi­tions.)

His legacy cer­tainly in­cludes the in­sight, gained through painstak­ing ex­per­i­men­tal work, that mi­cro­or­gan­isms need to be stud­ied in their nat­ural en­vi­ron­ment in or­der to re­ally get to know them. But rather than para­phrase, let's let him speak him­self:

(ex­cerpts from the chap­ter "Adap­ta­tion to the up­per tem­per­a­ture limit by Syne­chococ­cus", p43 ff, from Tom Brock's book A Sci­en­tist in Yel­low­stone Na­tional Park. ©Thomas D. Brock 2017)

Pho­to­syn­thetic ef­fi­ciency of al­gal cores taken from a lo­ca­tion at 58.5 °C and in­cu­bated at va­rious tem­pe­ratures. Curves are for sep­a­rate ex­pe­riments on Au­gust 29, 1966 (11−12 a.m.), and Au­gust 21, 1966 (2−3 p.m.). Val­ues on the or­di­nate are c.p.m./µg of chloro­phyll. Repre­sen­ta­tive val­ues for peak point of 11–12 a.m. se­ries are: ra­dioac­tiv­ity, 33,300 c.p.m./core; chloro­phyll, 19.2 µg/core. Source. Fron­tispiece: Samp­ling a small hot spring along the Yel­low­stone River. Au­gust 22, 1964. Source

One of the strik­ing things was the ob­ser­va­tion that near the up­per tem­per­a­ture limit for pho­totrophic life, the mi­crobial de­vel­op­ment was very mea­ger. A few de­grees be­­low the up­per tem­per­a­ture, de­fined mats started to form, but right at the up­per limit there was just a thin film, bare­ly vis­i­ble. The cyanobac­terium was mi­cro­scop­i­cally sim­i­lar through­out a wide tem­per­a­ture range from 70‑73 C (the up­per tem­per­a­ture limit) to 50‑55 C, where the mats were the thick­est.

One of the most in­ter­est­ing things I dis­cov­ered was that the thin film at the up­per limit was not strug­gling to sur­vive, but was op­ti­mally adapted to that tem­per­a­ture. It func­tioned bet­ter here than at lower tem­peratures. I showed this by mea­sur­ing pho­to­syn­the­sis with radioac­ti­ve car­bon diox­ide, do­ing what I called "tem­per­a­ture trans­fer" ex­per­i­ments, as will be ex­plained be­low.

The re­sults of this work were pub­lished in a short pa­per in 1967. (Brock, Micro‑organisms adapted to high tempera­tures. Na­ture: 214: 882–885.) This pa­per has been widely cited, but the broad im­pli­ca­tions for un­derstanding evo­lu­tion have not been fol­lowed up.

And he sum­ma­rized:

"Of the mi­cro-or­gan­isms which can grow at en­vi­ron­men­tal ex­tremes, one must dis­tin­guish be­tween those which are op­ti­mally adapted to the ex­tremes and those which grow bet­ter in less ex­treme con­di­tions. This is es­pe­cially im­por­tant be­cause an ex­treme en­vi­ron­ment is usu­ally re­cog­nized as one in which growth of the or­gan­ism is slow. An ex­per­i­men­tal ap­proach to this must per­mit the di­rect mea­sure­ment of the en­vi­ron­mental vari­able in the habi­tat in which the or­gan­ism is grow­ing and in which it has there­fore evolved. It is es­sen­tial to ex­am­ine the or­gan­ism di­rectly in its nat­ural en­vi­ron­ment rather than in cul­tures iso­lated from such habi­tats, be­cause it is not pos­sible to be cer­tain that the cul­tures are in­deed rep­re­sen­ta­tive of the nat­ural ma­te­r­ial, and it is usu­ally im­pos­si­ble to du­pli­cate in the lab­o­ra­tory all as­pects of the nat­ural en­vi­ron­ment."

 

Other Posts