Par­al­lel ERV-me­di­ated evo­lu­tion of blue egg color in chick­ens

Reprinted by per­mis­sion from Robert's blog "Pa­le­ovi­rol­ogy"

by Robert Gif­ford

The de­light­ful word 'oocyan' refers to the trait of blue-green eggshell color that oc­curs in na­tive chick­ens of Chile (Ma­puche fowl) and some of their de­scen­dants in North Amer­ica and Eu­rope, as well as cer­tain Asian chicken breeds (e.g. Dongx­i­ang, Lushi).

Oocyan is an au­to­so­mal dom­i­nant trait, and re­cent pa­pers in PLoS Ge­net­ics and PLoS ONE have es­tab­lished that it's oc­cur­rence in chick­ens from dif­fer­ent ge­o­graph­i­cal re­gions is due to an en­doge­nous retro­virus (ERV) in­ser­tion up­stream of the SLCO1B3 gene [1, 2].

An­cient nav­i­ga­tors — did Poly­ne­sians in­tro­duce chick­ens to Chile?

Re­mark­ably, the ERV in­ser­tions re­spon­si­ble for oocyan ap­pear to rep­re­sent sep­a­rate in­te­gra­tion events in Chi­nese ver­sus American/European chicken breeds — thus it ap­pears that the oocyan phe­no­type has evolved on two sep­a­rate oc­ca­sions, via the same ERV-me­di­ated mech­a­nism, in dis­tinct pop­u­la­tions of chick­ens.

Oocyan and hu­man pre­his­tory

Two long-de­bated is­sues among pre­his­to­ri­ans are whether there was a pre-Columbian in­tro­duc­tion of chick­ens to the Amer­i­cas, and whether an­cient mi­gra­tions led to Poly­ne­sian con­tact with South Amer­ica.

The wild an­ces­tor of the do­mes­ti­cated chicken is the red jun­gle­fowl, a South East Asian species. Arche­o­log­i­cal ev­i­dence in­di­cates that do­mes­ti­cated forms of this species had been in­tro­duced to China by around 5000 years ago, and were present in Poly­ne­sia ap­prox­i­mately 1000 years ago.

But how and when did chick­ens reach the Amer­i­cas? It is likely that Por­tuguese and Span­ish colonists in­tro­duced chick­ens to the East coast of South Amer­ica in the 15th cen­tury. How­ever, when Fran­cisco Pizarro reached Peru in 1532, he found that chick­ens were an in­te­gral part of In­can econ­omy and cul­ture, sug­gest­ing that the species had al­ready been present in the re­gion for a sub­stan­tial pe­riod of time. Con­se­quently, pre-Eu­ro­pean in­tro­duc­tions of chick­ens to the West coast of South Amer­ica, in­volv­ing both Asian and Poly­ne­sian con­tacts, have been pro­posed [3].

The Poly­ne­sian Tri­an­gle is a ge­o­graph­i­cal re­gion of the Pa­cific Ocean with Hawaii (Hawaiʻi – 1), New Zealand (Aotearoa – 2) and Easter Is­land (Rapa Nui – 3) at its cor­ners, but ex­clud­ing Fiji on its west­ern side. At the cen­ter is Tahiti (Tahiti – 5), with Samoa (Sā­moa – 4) to the west. Source

It has been sug­gested that Amer­i­can blue egg-lay­ing chick­ens (gal­li­nas Ma­puches, or "Arau­canas" to poul­try en­thu­si­asts) are de­scended from pre-Eu­ro­pean stock bred by the Ma­puche peo­ple of South­ern Chile.

His­tor­i­cal ev­i­dence for the oocyan phe­no­type in­di­cates that it has been present for at least 500 years in Chi­nese chick­ens, thus it might be ar­gued that oocyan Arau­canas de­rive from an an­cient Asian stock that found its way into Amer­ica via Pa­cific mi­gra­tions. How­ever, it now ap­pears that the oocyan Asian geno­type is dis­tinct from that in Ma­puche chick­ens, and has re­mained con­fined to China.

These find­ings in­di­cate that the pres­ence of blue eggs in Ma­puche fowl did not in­volve the in­tro­duc­tion of oocyan birds from Asia. How­ever, this does not pre­clude the pos­si­bil­ity of an Asian/Polynesian in­tro­duc­tion of chick­ens to South Amer­ica, which is now sup­ported by a lim­ited amount of ar­chae­o­log­i­cal ev­i­dence [3].

The EAV-HP group of en­doge­nous retro­viruses

Per­haps just as re­mark­able as the fact that in­de­pen­dent ERV in­ser­tions have twice gen­er­ated the oocyan phe­no­type in chick­ens, is the fact that both cases in­volved the same group of avian ERVs — a group called EAV-HP.

Shaped by ERVs

EAV-HP is found in var­i­ous species of the genus Gal­lus, and chicken genomes typ­i­cally con­tain 10 to 15 copies [4, 5]. EAV-HP first came to promi­nence when it be­came clear that avian leuko­sis virus sub­group J (ALV‑J), an avian retro­vi­ral pathogen that emerged in the late 1980s, arose through a re­com­bi­na­tion event in which the en­ve­lope gene of EAV-HP was ac­quired by an ex­oge­nous ALV. ALV‑J has since spread to be­come a world­wide an­i­mal health and wel­fare prob­lem, and in re­cent years has caused sig­nif­i­cant eco­nomic losses in com­mer­cial flocks.

The role of ERVs in avian genome evo­lu­tion

Oocyan is not the first ex­am­ple of an ERV-me­di­ated phe­no­type in birds. An in­ser­tion of avian leuko­sis virus (ALV) in in­tron 4 of the ty­rosi­nase gene re­sults in the re­ces­sive white plumage of some chicken breeds [6]. Late-feath­er­ing and 'henny-feath­er­ing' have also been linked to retro­vi­ral in­ser­tions [7, 8].

A re­cent study of ERV di­ver­sity in avian genomes found that a quar­ter of chicken ERVs are within or near cel­lu­lar genes, and many are found in pro­mot­ers and in­trons [9]. Fur­ther­more, 77% of in­tronic in­te­gra­tions were in the sense read­ing frame, sug­gest­ing that they might al­ter gene ex­pres­sion through the in­ser­tion of pro­mot­ers, splic­ing sig­nals, or polyadeny­la­tion sites.

As ge­netic stud­ies progress, it should be pos­si­ble to fur­ther elu­ci­date the role of ERVs in shap­ing phe­no­typic di­ver­sity in chick­ens and other birds.

 

Ref­er­ences

1.  Wang Z, Qu L, Yao J, Yang X, Li G, Zhang Y, Li J, Wang X, Bai J, Xu G, Deng X, Yang N, Wu C. (2013) An EAV-HP In­ser­tion in 5′Flanking Re­gion of SLCO1B3 Causes Blue Eggshell in the Chicken PLoS Genet. 9(1):e1003183 [view]

2.  Wragg D, Mwacharo JM, Al­calde JA, Wang C, Han JL, Gongora J, Gouri­chon D, Tix­ier-Boichard M, Han­otte O. (2013) En­doge­nous Retro­virus EAV-HP Linked to Blue Egg Phe­no­type in Ma­puche Fowl. PLOS ONE 8(8):e71393. [view]

3.  Storey AA, Ramírez JM, Quiroz D, Bur­ley DV, Ad­di­son DJ, Wal­ter R, An­der­son AJ, Hunt TL, Athens JS, Huy­nen L, Ma­ti­soo-Smith EA. (2007) Ra­dio­car­bon and DNA ev­i­dence for a pre-Columbian in­tro­duc­tion of Poly­ne­sian chick­ens to Chile. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 19;104(25):10335–9. Epub 2007 Jun 7. [view]

4.  Ben­son SJ, Ruis BL, Fadly AM, Con­klin KF. (1998) The unique en­ve­lope gene of the sub­group J avian leuko­sis virus de­rives from ev/J proviruses, a novel fam­ily of avian en­doge­nous viruses. J Vi­rol. 72(12):10157–64. [view]

5.  Sacco MA, Howes K, Venu­gopal K. (2001) In­tact EAV-HP en­doge­nous retro­virus in Sonnerat's jun­gle fowl. J Vi­rol. 75(4):2029–32. [view]

6.  Chang C‑M, Cov­ille J‑L, Co­querelle G, Gouri­chon D, Oul­mouden A, et al. (2006) Com­plete as­so­ci­a­tion be­tween a retro­vi­ral in­ser­tion in the ty­rosi­nase gene and the re­ces­sive white mu­ta­tion in chick­ens. BMC Ge­nomics 7: 19 [view]

7.  Ba­con LD, Smith E, Crit­ten­den LB, Haven­stein GB (1988) As­so­ci­a­tion of the slow feath­er­ing (K) and an en­doge­nous vi­ral (ev21) gene on the Z chro­mo­some of chick­ens. Poult Sci 67: 191–197. [pubmed]

8.  Mat­sum­ine H, Herbst MA, Ou SH, Wil­son JD, McPhaul MJ (1991) Aro­matase mRNA in the ex­trag­o­nadal tis­sues of chick­ens with the henny-feath­er­ing trait is de­rived from a dis­tinc­tive pro­moter struc­ture that con­tains a seg­ment of a retro­vi­ral long ter­mi­nal re­peat. Func­tional or­ga­ni­za­tion of the Se­bright, Leghorn, and Campine aro­matase genes. J Biol Chem 266: 19900–19907. [view]

9.  Bolisetty M, Blomberg J, Be­nachen­hou F, Sper­ber G, Beemon K. (2012) Un­ex­pected di­ver­sity and ex­pres­sion of avian en­doge­nous retro­viruses. MBio.3(5):e00344-12. [view]

 

Other Posts

  • Name-That-Bug Quiz

    by Elio — Tax­on­omy is not what most of us take up as a field of study but we run into it all the time. As­sum­ing that you have learned some­thing about mi­cro­bial tax­on­omy, per­haps by os­mo­sis, would you like to test your knowl­edge?

  • Ring­ing a Mi­cro­bial Din­ner Bell

    by Mark O. Mar­tin — A few weeks ago, I wrote a short Small Things Con­sid­ered es­say de­scrib­ing the di­verse roles that odors can play in mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy. Ar­ti­cles here and there writ­ten by oth­ers at­test to a grow­ing in­ter­est in so­ciomi­cro­bi­ol­ogy. As for my­self, I have long sus­pected that mi­crobes are con­stantly send­ing and…

  • In­side a Choanofla­gel­late

    Pic­tures Con­sid­ered #59 by Roberto — Choanofla­gel­lates (en­dear­ingly re­ferred to as "choanos") are the clos­est liv­ing rel­a­tive of an­i­mals and as such they can pro­vide in­sights into the evo­lu­tion of an­i­mal mul­ti­cel­lu­lar­ity. In­ter­est­ingly, at least two choano de­vel­op­men­tal fea­tures are in­duced by bac­te­r­ial prod­ucts.

  • Sib­lings Strike Again

    by S. Mar­vin Fried­man — Bac­te­ria ca­pa­ble of sporu­la­tion go out of their way to grow rather than sporu­late. They will there­fore try to ob­tain needed nu­tri­ents, even at the cost of killing their neigh­bors. When starved for nu­tri­ents, cells of Bacil­lus sub­tilis en­gage in can­ni­bal­ism, that is they lyse their sib­lings and...

  • The Age of Imag­ing

    by Elio — Not so long ago, it would have seemed im­plau­si­ble that bi­ol­ogy would re­turn to its ori­gins as a vi­sual sci­ence. Some would have con­sid­ered this a re­gres­sion to the days when bi­ol­o­gists were pretty much con­fined to study­ing just what they could see, such as the shapes of or­gan­isms and their tis­sues. Back then, they fo­cused on re­fin­ing what Pliny had ob­served with his bare eyes, what Hooke and Leeuwen­hoek saw un­der the mi­cro­scope.