Bac­te­ria Liv­ing With­out Phages?

by Merry Youle

Are there en­vi­ron­ments where there are abun­dant bac­te­ria and no phages? Sounds like one of our Tal­mu­dic Ques­tions, but this one has a spe­cific an­swer, and that an­swer is Yes. That en­vi­ron­ment was found within a cys­tic fi­bro­sis (CF) lung.

This story comes from a pair of pa­pers re­cently pub­lished by a group of mi­cro­bial ecol­o­gists re­port­ing their sur­vey of the mi­crobes and DNA viruses present in the lungs of two late-stage CF pa­tients. Pre­vi­ous stud­ies had all re­lied on sam­pled spu­tum or bronchial alve­o­lar lavage fluid. These re­searchers in­stead took ad­van­tage of the op­por­tu­nity to in­ves­ti­gate the ex­plant lungs from a CF pa­tient who re­ceived a lung trans­plant. They dis­sected the lungs, iso­lated the mi­crobes and viruses sep­a­rately from each lobe, and then ex­tracted the DNA. This ap­proach en­abled them to de­ter­mine not only the di­ver­sity within each lobe, but also to ask whether each lobe housed its own dis­tinc­tive com­mu­nity.

Be­cause CT scans are able to de­tect even very small nod­ules in and plug­ging of the lung, LDCT of the chest is es­pe­cially ef­fec­tive for di­ag­nos­ing lung can­cer at its ear­li­est stage and air­way plug­ging caused by CF. Source

Their analy­ses yielded sev­eral in­ter­est­ing find­ings, but the one that caught my at­ten­tion most con­cerned the up­per lobes. For most en­vi­ron­ments, it is com­mon to find five to ten viruses (mostly phages) for every mi­cro­bial cell (mostly bac­te­ria), and high vi­ral di­ver­sity, but these lobes with their ram­pant mi­cro­bial com­mu­nity had no de­tectable phages. To the best of my knowl­edge, this is the first re­port of such a cir­cum­stance. But then again, these lobes aren't your typ­i­cal en­vi­ron­ment. They were the site of the most se­vere dis­ease in this pa­tient and ex­hib­ited ex­ten­sive mu­cus plug­ging of the air­ways and bronchiectatic changes. While each of the other lobes housed ~102 vi­ral geno­types in­clud­ing phages that in­fect key CF pathogens (Pseudomonas spp., Burk­holde­ria spp, and Staphy­lo­coc­cus spp.), only 3 vi­ral geno­types were found in these lobes and none of them were phage.

What might be go­ing on? Pseudomonas and Burk­holde­ria live in CF lungs en­sconced within biofilms of their own mak­ing. Their mu­coid poly­sac­cha­ride ma­trix pro­vides pro­tec­tion against the host im­mune re­sponse and com­pli­cates an­tibi­otic treat­ment. The au­thors pos­tu­late that these same bar­ri­ers, most ev­i­dent in the up­per lobes of the trans­plant pa­tient, ef­fec­tively shield the bac­te­ria from phage pre­da­tion – ergo, no phages found there. With the spread of CF pathogens with mul­ti­ple an­tibi­otic re­sis­tance, there is ac­tive ex­plo­ration of the pos­si­ble ef­fi­cacy of in­hala­tion phage ther­apy. Could phages in­tro­duced by in­hala­tion ther­apy fare any bet­ter? The pres­ence of phages in the less ob­structed lobes of these lungs sug­gests yes, at least dur­ing ear­lier stages of the dis­ease be­fore the bac­te­ria have built such ex­ten­sive bar­ri­cades.

The mes­sage for the bac­te­ria? If you can't run, you can still hide.

 

Ref­er­ence

Will­ner D, Haynes MR, Furlan M, Han­son N, Kirby B, Lim YW, Rainey PB, Schmieder R, Youle M, Con­rad D, Ro­hwer F. (2011). Case stud­ies of the spa­tial het­ero­gene­ity of DNA viruses in the cys­tic fi­bro­sis lung. Amer­i­can Jour­nal of Res­pi­ra­tory Cell and Mol­e­c­u­lar Bi­ol­ogy. PMID 21980056

 

Other Posts

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Howard Cash
14 years ago

It's pos­si­ble all the cells of Pseudomonas aerug­i­nosa (Pa) in these oc­cluded lobes are de­scen­dants of one strain se­lected for mu­coidy by lyso­genic con­ver­sion. This sin­gle clone would be­long to a sin­gle phage im­mu­nity group which would abort con­tin­ued lyso­genic cy­cles and hence no free phage. I sus­pect that these bac­te­ria con­tain just one tem­per­ate phage that has the abil­ity to se­lect for or con­vert to mu­coidy other iso­lates of Pa. Please see: R.V. Miller and V.J. Renta Rubero. Mu­coid Con­ver­sion by Phages of Pseudom­nas aerug­i­nosa Strains from Pa­tients with Cys­tic Fi­bro­sis. J. Clin. Mi­cro­biol. 19:717–719 (1984). Phage ther­apy would have to con­sider phage less likely to con­vert cells to mu­coidy and from dif­fer­ent im­mu­nity groups.
Merry replies: Good point! The same au­thors had pub­lished a sur­vey of the mi­cro­bial com­mu­ni­ties in these lobes and I had checked there ear­lier for any hints of prophages. There are a grow­ing num­ber of en­vi­ron­ments known now where tem­per­ate phages pre­dom­i­nate. But their mi­cro­bial sru­vey was based on 16S am­pli­cons only, with no other ge­nomic se­quenc­ing. You tied all this to­gether into a pos­si­ble sce­nario. I do hope some re­searchers are look­ing in those di­rec­tions.

Alice M
14 years ago

Seems Phage ther­apy could make its long de­served come­back hope­fully in a few years.
Merry replies: Phage ther­apy for CF is def­i­nitely an ac­tive area of re­search now. One tact is to use phages with en­hanced ca­pa­bil­i­ties to di­gest the poly­sac­cha­rides in the biofilms, thus giv­ing them eas­ier ac­cess to the lurk­ing bac­te­ria.

14 years ago

Very in­ter­est­ing and proof again of the power that Quo­rum Sens­ing in bac­te­ria holds, not only in al­low­ing the struc­ture of the biofilm to de­crease the ef­fec­tive­ness of an­tibi­otic ther­apy but also to in­hibit the nat­ural bac­te­ria killer ‑Phage!!
I won­der if fu­ture treat­ments might com­bine per­haps Phage Ther­apy and QS drench­ing analogs??
Merry replies: That sounds like a good strat­egy, Lynda. If we could in­hibit biofilm pro­duc­tion us­ing analogs to dis­rupt the bac­te­r­ial quo­rum sens­ing, then the phage might be able to help us in con­trol­ling the re­silient CF pathogens. Phage ther­apy could give us more phage on our side, phages spe­cific for the CF pathogens.