Aeonophiles

by Karen G. Lloyd

The sed­i­ments un­der­ly­ing the world's oceans con­tain about a third of the to­tal num­ber of mi­cro­bial cells on the planet. This is a vast bios­phere, mostly com­prised of deep branches on the tree of life that no one has yet fig­ured out how to grow in a lab­o­ra­tory. Since grow­ing mi­crobes in a lab­o­ra­tory is the best way we can learn about them, this means that there's a lot of mys­tery about what makes this strange ecosys­tem tick. Prob­a­bly the strangest thing about these ecosys­tems is that they are es­sen­tially cut off from both the sur­face world and sub­sur­face sources of en­ergy for chemosyn­the­sis, like in hy­drother­mal vents. Yes, there are plenty of vents scat­tered around the seafloor, and other good sources of en­ergy like methane cold seeps and vol­canic erup­tions, but I'm not talk­ing about those places. I'm talk­ing about the great, bor­ing ex­panses of seden­tary muck whose most no­table fea­ture is that noth­ing ever hap­pens. This means that one of the largest mi­cro­bial ecosys­tems on the planet gets no fresh food de­liv­er­ies for mil­lions of years. Every liv­ing be­ing that we com­monly in­ter­act with, in­clud­ing pretty much all our lab­o­ra­tory cul­tures, would die if you didn't feed them for that long. 

So, why is there a highly di­verse, meta­bol­i­cally ac­tive bios­phere hang­ing out where no one can eat? Roberto Kolter, and his for­mer lab mem­bers Steve Finkel, Erik Zinser and oth­ers, showed us that even com­mon bac­te­ria ac­tu­ally have a sur­pris­ing tol­er­ance to star­va­tion. Even E. coli, which can't shut down into meta­bol­i­cally in­ac­tive spores con­tin­ues with sub­pop­u­la­tions grow­ing, dy­ing, and com­pet­ing with each other long af­ter you re­move the food. Af­ter starv­ing for months or even years, they be­come griz­zled old tough guys who ac­tu­ally out­com­pete younger cells un­der star­va­tion con­di­tions. Roberto and his folks called this the Growth Ad­van­tage in Sta­tion­ary Phase, which has about the most adorable acronym ever for a strain des­per­ately fight­ing for life: GASP. 

It's much harder to run an ex­per­i­ment for a thou­sand years (al­though I re­cently had the plea­sure of see­ing an ex­per­i­ment set up by Charles Cock­ell, at the Uni­ver­sity of Ed­in­burgh, that will run for 500 years – some­one else is go­ing to have to write the blog post about that one). How­ever, if we ex­trap­o­late from the ex­per­i­ments run by na­ture un­der­neath our oceans all over the world, the most rea­son­able con­clu­sion is that the bac­te­ria, ar­chaea, and pos­si­bly eu­kary­otes in these ma­rine sed­i­ment ecosys­tems have some­how adapted to have cells that sur­vive the whole lengthy process of bur­ial. This means these mi­crobes might be evo­lu­tion­ar­ily adapted to live for hun­dreds of thou­sands of years. I'm not talk­ing about the age of their lin­eage. I'm talk­ing about THE ACTUAL CELLS be­ing that old.

The ul­tra-long-lived aeonophiles! Source.

It re­cently oc­curred to my col­league Drew Steen and I that we need a word to de­scribe or­gan­isms that have adapted to live for a mil­lion (I mean, maybe?) years, es­pe­cially since the fact that their lifes­pans are this long has to re­main a hy­poth­e­sis, so we need to be able to talk about them as we test it. We came up with aeonophiles. It means that they love long time pe­ri­ods. It seems hard to pro­nounce, but it's ee-ohn-oh-files. Like some­one who loves wine, but with an ex­tra syl­la­ble. I don't know for cer­tain that cells can ac­tu­ally achieve this feat of liv­ing for a mil­lion years, while slowly re­plac­ing bro­ken bits but never di­vid­ing. But cur­rently, all ev­i­dence sug­gests this is a rea­son­able hy­poth­e­sis. Now that they have a name, I'm hop­ing peo­ple will go forth and study these lit­tle weirdos!

Karen G. Lloyd is the Wrigley Pro­fes­sor of Earth Sci­ences, and Ma­rine and En­vi­ron­men­tal Bi­ol­ogy at the Uni­ver­sity of South­ern Cal­i­for­nia. She dis­cov­ers strange types of mi­cro­bial life deeply-buried in­side Earth's crust, and wrote In­trater­res­tri­als: Dis­cov­er­ing the Strangest Life on Earth, long-listed for the PEN EO Wil­son Lit­er­ary Award.

 


We'd be de­lighted to hear from you! You can com­ment be­low, send us an email or reach us via Bluesky or Mastodon. Please sub­scribe to get email no­ti­fi­ca­tions of our new posts.

Other Posts

  • One If by Land and Two If by Sea

    by S. Mar­vin Fried­man — Is the cur­rent pre­oc­cu­pa­tion of the sci­en­tific com­mu­nity with se­quenc­ing every genome ex­tant merely an ex­er­cise in pro­vid­ing data­bases for Gen­Bank? Cer­tainly not, for this in­for­ma­tion also re­veals very im­por­tant char­ac­ter­is­tics of the or­gan­ism un­der analy­sis. For ex­am­ple, we are at the early stages of a med­ical rev­o­lu­tion that will see af­ford­able…

  • Dive! Dive! Dive!

    by Eddy Ma­teescu — This ur­gent call, bor­rowed from movies about sub­ma­rine war­fare, ap­plies to this non-mi­cro­bial post­ing that is in­tended as an ap­pe­tizer for the fas­ci­nat­ing sub­ject of par­a­site mod­i­fi­ca­tion of host be­hav­ior.

  • Pore Hop­ping

    by Christoph — In his re­cent post, Ro­ber­to was pleased to learn of a stu­dy ad­dress­ing bac­terial che­mi­cal eco­lo­gy with­in a very small eco­sys­tem, name­ly the hair fol­li­cles of hu­man skin, where Cuti­bac­ter­ium ac­nes con­tend with Sta­phy­lo­cocci. Here now, it's again about C. ac­nes, but this time about se­ver­al strains com­pet­ing for growth in hu­man hair fol­li­cles, pores. An eco­lo­gi­cal fa­mi­ly af­fair, so to speak.

  • An In­ac­tive Mine Pro­vides Ac­tive Op­por­tu­ni­ties

    by Elio — Metage­nomics is a fine tool in­deed for sur­vey­ing a mi­cro­bial com­mu­nity in con­cert, treat­ing both the cul­tured and un­cul­tured equally. When the sam­ple stud­ied is rich in mi­cro­bial va­ri­ety, as of­ten is the case, the pieces of genomes can be re­luc­tant to re­veal the ge­netic her­itage of whole mi­crobes. But there are a few par­tic­u­lar en­vi­ron­ments that are...

  • The Evo­lu­tion of Death or...

    ...Is There Any­thing that the Eu­kary­otes In­vented?
    by Jamie Henzy — There is dam­age, as in a fender-ben­der, and then there is dam­age, as in "this ve­hi­cle is to­talled." The best-stud­ied re­sponse to dam­age in Es­cherichia coli (some would say, there­fore in the world) is the SOS re­sponse – me­di­ated by the recA-lexA lo­cus – in which the cell at­tempts to re­pair dam­age to its DNA.

  • The Story of Free Use GFP (fuGFP)

    by Nick Cole­man and Mark Som­merville — It is per­haps ironic that for a story about open-source sci­ence, the tale of Free Use GFP (fuGFP) be­gins with a com­mer­cial col­lab­o­ra­tion. The Cole­man lab was con­tracted by a small in­dus­try part­ner to de­velop green flu­o­res­cent bac­te­ria for qual­ity con­trol ap­pli­ca­tions. We planned ini­tially to use su­per­folder GFP (sfGFP) for this job, since...

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted