Ants, Fungi & Mosses

Note­wor­thy

Our re­la­tion­ships with other life forms re­sult from ex­changes that are rarely straight­for­ward. A re­cent pub­li­ca­tion that fur­ther ex­am­ines the zom­bie ant–fungus in­ter­ac­tion shows just how ad­di­tional com­plex­ity may lie at the root of some as­so­ci­a­tions. 

Re­searchers from Brazil won­dered if the fungi that in­fect ants and ma­nip­u­late their be­hav­ior could be lead­ing a dual lifestyle: as an en­do­phyte in plants and as a par­a­sitic en­to­mopathogen. In­fected ants show a pref­er­ence for spe­cific death sites, and ant-in­fect­ing species in the Ama­zon are also known to have a fi­delity to­wards bryophytes as at­tach­ment sites for death. Could this in any way be due to a co­evo­lu­tion­ary adap­ta­tion link­ing fun­gal strate­gies and mi­cro­hab­i­tats?

To test if plants con­tain en­to­mopath­o­genic fungi as­so­ci­ated with in­sect host ma­nip­u­la­tion, the sci­en­tists char­ac­ter­ized fun­gal com­mu­ni­ties as­so­ci­ated with Ama­zon­ian bryophytes. By look­ing at the highly spe­cial­ized par­a­sitic fun­gal genus Ophio­cordy­ceps, they found ev­i­dence con­sis­tent with an en­do­phytic lifestyle in Ama­zon­ian mosses.

Fig­ure leg­end Graphic schematic of the ex­per­i­men­tal sam­pling de­sign. Il­lus­tra­tive overview of the sam­pling lay­out within a trop­i­cal for­est un­der­story. Color-coded ar­rows in­di­cate sam­pling cat­e­gories: INT (bit­ten bryophyte), EXT (ad­ja­cent bryophyte, ≥ 5 cm), EPF (en­to­mopath­o­genic fun­gus), and CONTROL (bryophyte ≥ 10 m from any in­fected ca­daver). Il­lus­tra­tion pro­duced with the as­sis­tance of GenAI (Gem­ini Pro 3.1, Google); B Macro-pho­to­graph of an Ophio­cordy­ceps-in­fected ant ca­daver (EPF) bit­ing onto a bryophyte (INT). Source

The find­ings chal­lenge the pre­vail­ing idea that these fungi are strict in­sect pathogens and in­di­cate a non-ran­dom as­so­ci­a­tion that emerged over time, adding a layer of com­plex­ity that pos­si­bly con­tributes to fun­gal per­sis­tence and re­pro­duc­tion. 

 


We'd be de­lighted to hear from you! You can com­ment be­low, send us an email or reach us via Bluesky or Mastodon. Please sub­scribe to get email no­ti­fi­ca­tions of our new posts.

Other Posts

  • "The Great Plate Count Anom­aly" that is no more

    by Gemma Reguera — For over a cen­tury, mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gists have been us­ing growth me­dia so­lid­i­fied with agar to cul­ture mi­crobes from en­vi­ron­men­tal sam­ples. In­di­vid­ual cells are eas­ily sep­a­rated on the solid sur­face, al­low­ing each cell to grow and di­vide and form a colony of thou­sands of clones. We can change the nu­tri­ents in the me­dia...

  • Small Size Holds Sway

    by Elio — Let me me­an­der a bit be­fore tack­ling the topic of how small a size mi­crobes can at­tain. One of the main tools in this busi­ness is fil­tra­tion, a tech­nol­ogy that we tend to take for granted in the mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal lab. Yet, fil­tra­tion has a no­table his­tory and no­table ap­pli­ca­tions. It was used...

  • Fi­nally, Farewell to "Stamp Col­lect­ing"...

    by Christoph Weigel — The per­spec­tive pa­per by Mar­garet Mc­Fall-Ngai and col­leagues was re­cently fea­tured by Elio in this blog, strongly em­pha­siz­ing its Chicx­u­lub-like im­pact on mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy. Here I of­fer a post­script, a few loosely con­nected thoughts from a his­tor­i­cal per­spec­tive about its im­pact on bi­ol­ogy and life sci­ences in gen­eral…

  • Ice Ice Maybe

    by Janie — The abil­ity to trig­ger ice for­ma­tion is a prop­erty shared by cer­tain par­ti­cles both or­ganic and in­or­ganic, in­clud­ing bac­te­ria, viruses, phy­to­plank­ton, pollen, soot, dust. These lit­tle par­ti­cles help wa­ter mol­e­cules come to­gether and form ice at warmer tem­per­a­tures than freez­ing point...

  • Cul­ti­vat­ing the An­ces­tors (4|4)

    by Christoph — Hav­ing 1 or 2 'As­gard' ar­chaea un­der the mi­cro­scope – af­ter hav­ing cul­ti­vated them with great ef­fort and even more pa­tience – and look­ing them in the face is ex­cit­ing, but a bit un­satisfying when they are cousins. Are they mav­er­icks or rather typ­i­cal for "Lo­kis"? Here are the por­traits of two more dis­tant re­la­tives, both also cousins: Mar­gulis­ar­chaeum pep­ti­dophila HC1 and Flexarchae­um multipro­tru­sionis SC1.

Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Allen Henderson
21 days ago

Re­minds me of a 2012 pa­per show­ing di­rect trans­fer of iso­topi­cally la­belled ni­tro­gen from in­sects back to plants via in­sect pathogens. Neat find­ing, but also re­mark­able for land­ing this high pro­file pub via a sin­gle data fig­ure 🙂

"En­do­phytic In­sect-Par­a­sitic Fungi Translo­cate Ni­tro­gen Di­rectly from In­sects to Plants"
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1222289

(free to read but re­quires a lo­gin)