Cul­ti­vat­ing the An­ces­tors… (1|4)

by Christoph

...is a meta­phys­i­cal af­fair across all hu­man cul­tures. For ex­per­i­men­tal bi­ol­o­gists, it is the more pro­saic, phys­i­cal task of cul­ti­vat­ing – or 'cul­tur­ing', but I won't di­gress into se­man­tics – ex­tant pro­karyotic rel­a­tives of the an­cestors of the eu­kary­otes in the lab. Or the 'most likely' an­ces­tors of the eu­kary­otes, to be cau­tious when leap­ing back ~2 bil­lion years in time. Now, meet Pro­methe­archaeum syn­troph­icum MK-D1 (4.46 Mbp) that you see on the Fron­tispiece, and its syn­trophic com­pan­ions, the sul­fur-re­duc­ing pro­teobac­terium Halode­sulfovibrio sp. (4.13 Mbp) and the methano­genic archae­on Me­tha­no­genium sp. (2.33 Mbp).
 

© H. Imachi, M.K. Nobu, and JAMSTEC Scan­ning elec­tron mi­croscopy im­age of P. syn­troph­icum strain MK-D1. Source

At the ASM Gen­eral Meet­ing 2014 in Boston, Anja Spang in­tro­duced the Lokiar­chaeota to the au­di­ence – in­clud­ing Elio and me – mem­bers of an ar­chaeal phy­lum whose genomes "en­code an ex­panded reper­toire of eu­kary­otic sig­na­ture pro­teins" (see here). Could the Lokiar­chaeota "...bridge the gap be­tween prokary­otes and eu­kary­otes" as stated in the ti­tle the of Spanget al. (2015) pa­per? In the STC post A Class Asks Ques­tions… from 2015, a cor­re­spond­ing au­thor of this pa­per, Thijs Et­tema, frankly ad­mit­ted that the bridge would be some­what shaky as long as they could not get the cells un­der the mi­cro­scope and learn more about their me­tab­o­lism through cul­ti­va­tion.

A Whiff of Tax­on­omy  What be­gan as 'Lokiarcheota' was soon re­named 'As­gard' ar­chaea (2017) or 'As­gardarcheota' (2017), and you can see how its var­i­ous mem­bers, all given an­cient Norse names and only known through DNA se­quences, are dis­trib­uted among sub­groups of dif­fer­ent tax­o­nomic ranks on Wiki­pedia. With the first suc­cess­ful co‑cultivation and se­quenc­ing of the com­plete genome of Pro­methe­archaeum syn­troph­icum MK-D1, the topic of this post, it was fi­nally possi­ble to ta­xo­nomically clas­sify the en­tire 'As­gard' zoo as Clade 'Pro­teoar­chaeota' in the King­dom 'Promet­hearchaeati'. To help you nav­i­gate the Tree of Life (ToL), click here to see the ap­prox­i­mate po­si­tions of P. syn­throph­icum in 'Loki.', of Halodesul­fovib­rio sp. in 'Ther­mod­esul­fobac­te­ria', and of the fu­ture mito­chon­drion in 'Alpha­pro­teobacteria' (in the ToL, you see that the tax­o­nomic names of prokary­otic groups have evolved faster than the species).
 

Cul­ti­va­tion of Promet­hearchaeum syn­troph­icum MK‑D1

It took Hi­royuki Imachi, Masaru Nobu and their 22 col­lab­o­ra­tors at 海洋研究開発機構 (JAM­ST­EC), Yoko­suka, Japan, more than 12 years from their de­tec­tion of 16S rRNA genes of Lokiar­chae­ota in an ac­tive methane-seep sed­i­ment core (949C3) that was col­lected from the Omine Ridge, Nankai Trough off Ku­mano area, Japan at 2,533 m be­low the sea sur­face in 2006 to their pub­li­ca­tion of Prome­the­archaeum syn­troph­icum MK‑D1, ti­tled Iso­la­tion of an ar­chaeon at the prokaryote–eukary­ote in­ter­face, in 2020 (for­mally cor­rect: 'Can­di­da­tus Promethe­archaeum syn­troph­icum' strain MK‑D1).

Fig­ure 1. Schematic di­a­gram and pho­tographs of the con­tin­u­ous-flow biore­ac­tor with polyurethane spon­ges as mi­cro­bial habi­tats, called down-flow hang­ing sponge (DHS) re­ac­tor. (a) Syn­the­tic sea­wa­ter tank, (b) distri­bu­tor, © gas col­lect­ing bag, (d) sponge car­rier sam­pling port and (e) port for the pH/ORP sen­sor. Source. Hiro Imachi said on Bluesky: "I've been sup­ply­ing 0.57 L of anaer­o­bic medium to the re­ac­tor each day, which brings the to­tal to 3733 L so far. Also, my re­ac­tor will be turn­ing 18 on De­cem­ber 28th."

They en­gi­neered and op­er­ated a methane-fed con­tin­u­ous-flow biore­ac­tor sys­tem (Fig­ure 1) for more than 2,000 days to en­rich microorgan­isms in the anaer­o­bic (anoxic) ma­rine metha­ne-seep sed­i­ments from the drill core sam­ple and found, by 16S rRNA gene analy­sis, var­i­ous phy­lo­gene­tically di­verse un­cul­tivated mi­croor­gan­isms, in­clud­ing Lokiar­chaeota (see here, DSAG (MBG‑B) ). Sam­ples of the biore­ac­tor com­mu­nity were in­oc­u­lated for fur­ther en­rich­ment in serum bot­tles with sim­ple sub­strates and basal medium, and, af­ter ~1 year, they found faint cell tur­bid­ity in a cul­ture con­tain­ing casamino acids that was in­cu­bated (ano­xi­cally) at 20 °C. 16S rRNA gene analy­sis re­vealed a sim­ple com­mu­nity that con­tained Me­tha­no­ge­ni­um sp., Halodesul­fovib­rio sp. and a small pop­u­la­tion of Lokiar­chaeota, des­ig­nated strain MK-D1.

Re­peated sub­cul­ti­va­tion grad­u­ally en­riched the ar­chaeon MK-D1, which has a 30–60-day lag phase, an ex­tremely slow growth rate with a dou­bling time of ~14–25 days, and low cell yield af­ter 3 months to reach full growth: ~105 16S rRNA gene copies/mL, that is con­cen­tra­tions of bac­te­ria you find in tap wa­ter. Af­ter six trans­fers and un­der op­ti­mized growth con­di­tions, MK‑D1 reached 13% abun­dance in a tri-cul­ture con­tain­ing a Halodesul­fovib­rio sp. bac­terium (85%) and a Me­thanogenium sp. ar­chaeon (2%). Analy­ses by FISH and SEM re­vealed a close phys­i­cal associa­tion of the three mi­croor­gan­isms (see here), Through stable‑isotope prob­ing the re­searchers dis­cov­ered that MK-D1 is ca­pa­ble of ca­tab­o­liz­ing ten amino acids and pep­tides through syn­trophic growth with Halodesul­fovib­rio sp. and Me­thanogenium sp. through in­ter­species H2 (and/or for­mate) trans­fer. Through ad­di­tional sub­cul­ti­va­tion in me­dium sup­ple­mented with 20 amino acids and pow­dered milk, they could elim­i­nate the Ha­lodesulfovibrio sp. pop­u­la­tion, thus ob­tain­ing a pure co‑culture of strain MK-D1, now nam­ing it Promet­hearchaeum syn­troph­icum, and Methanoge­nium sp. (see here, c).

Note  Masaru Nobu briefly sum­ma­rized the iso­la­tion of P. syn­troph­icum MK-D1 in his recorded con­tri­bution to the JGI2021 Meet­ing from 02:50–04:15 min.

Mor­phol­ogy and me­tab­o­lism of P. syn­troph­icum MK‑D1

Un­der the mi­cro­scope, MK‑D1 cells are small cocci with an av­er­age di­am­e­ter of 550 nm, and mostly found em­bed­ded in ex­tra­cel­lu­lar poly­mer sub­stances (EPS) as ag­gre­gates (Fig­ure 2, b). In sam­ples from co‑cultures, MK‑D1 cells are eas­ily dis­tin­guished from Methano­genium sp. cells, which are highly ir­reg­u­lar coc­coid cells of ≥2 μm (see here, d+e). Divid­ing MK‑D1 cells have less EPS and a ring-like struc­ture around the cells (Fig­ure 2, c). Cryo-EM and TEM analy­ses re­vealed that the cells con­tain no vis­i­ble or­ganelle-like in­clu­sions, the hall­marks of eu­kary­otic cells. MK‑D1 cells are very "blebby" and pro­duce mem­brane vesi­cles of 50–280 nm in diame­ter (Fig­ure 2, a–f) and chains of blebs (Fig­ure 2, c). Given the even dis­tance be­tween the in­ner and outer lay­ers of the cell enve­­lope (Fig­ure 2, d), the MK-D1 cell enve­lope may be com­posed of a mem­brane and a sur­round­ing S‑layer, given the pres­ence of four genes en­coding pu­ta­tive S‑layer pro­teins in its genome, and stalk-like pre­cur­sor struc­tures on the sur­face of the mem­brane vesi­cles (Fig­ure 2, e).
 

Fig­ure 2. Mi­croscopy char­ac­ter­i­za­tion and lipid com­position of MK-D1 (Click here for pan­els a and e). a–c, SEM im­ages of MK-D1. Sin­gle cell (a), ag­gre­gated cells cov­ered with EPS-like ma­te­ri­als (b) and a di­vid­ing cell with po­lar chains of blebs ©. d, Cryo-elec­tron tomo­gra­phy im­age of MK-D1. The top-right in­set im­age shows a mag­ni­fi­ca­tion of the boxed area to show the cell enve­lope struc­ture. e, Cryo-EM im­age of large mem­brane vesi­cles at­tached to and sur­round­ing MK-D1 cells. f, Ul­trathin sec­tion of an MK-D1 cell and a mem­brane ve­sicle. The bot­tom-right in­set im­age shows a mag­ni­fied view of the mem­brane vesic­le. g, h, SEM im­ages of MK-D1 cells pro­duc­ing long branch­ing (g) and straight (h) mem­brane pro­tru­sions. i, Ul­tra­thin sec­tion of a MK-D1 cell with pro­tru­sions. Scale bars, 1 μm (b, c, g, h), 500 nm (a, d, e, i) and 200 nm (f). a–c, g, h, SEM im­ages are rep­re­sen­ta­tive of n = 122 recorded im­ages that were ob­tained from 4 inde­pendent ob­ser­va­tions from 4 cul­ture sam­ples. d, e, Cryo-EM im­ages are rep­re­sen­ta­tive of n = 14 recorded im­ages that were taken from two inde­pendent ob­ser­va­tions from two cul­ture sam­ples. f, i, The ul­tra­thin sec­tion im­ages are rep­re­sen­ta­tive of n = 131 recorded im­ages that were ob­tained from six in­dependent ob­ser­va­tions from six cul­ture sam­ples. White ar­rows in the im­ages in­di­cate large mem­brane ve­­sicles. Source

MK-D1 cells not in the process of di­vi­sion form sev­eral, oc­ca­sion­ally branch­ing mem­brane-based cy­tosol-con­nected pro­tru­sions of var­i­ous lengths with di­am­e­ters of 80–100 nm (Fig­ure 2,  g+h; Fron­tispiece). These "tiny arms" are dis­tinct from those of other ar­chaea, which are known to use pro­tru­sions to form elab­o­rate net­works and in­tra­cel­lu­lar con­nec­tions ("nano­tubes").

With 4.46 Mbp, the genome of Promet­hearchaeum syn­troph­icum MK-D1 is in the size range of other free-liv­ing ar­chaea. It en­codes most of the genes nec­es­sary to syn­the­size ether-type li­pids – ex­cept a rec­og­niz­able gene for GGGP syn­thase – and lacks genes for es­ter-type lipid syn­thesis. MK-D1 has thus a typ­i­cal ar­chaeal mem­brane with C20-phy­tane and C40-biphy­tanes as con­firmed by analy­sis of the lipid com­po­si­tion in its co-cul­ture with Methano­geni­um sp.

Imachi, Nobu et al. (2020) found that P. syn­troph­icum MK-D1 can de­grade ten amino acids anaer­o­bi­cally and use them for growth, as con­firmed by mon­i­tor­ing the de­ple­tion of amino acids in grow­ing co-cul­tures, and pro­duces both H2 and for­mate (HCO2–) from amino acids for in­ter­species elec­tron trans­fer. The lat­ter was con­firmed by quan­ti­fy­ing the up­take of a mix­ture of 13C and 15N‑labelled amino acids through NanoSIMS. The genome only en­codes one NiFe hy­dro­ge­nase, MvhADG–HdrABC, and molyb­dopterin-de­pen­­dent for­mate de­hydro­genase, FdhA, which sug­gests that MK-D1 can pro­duce and syn­troph­i­cally trans­fer H2 and for­mate us­ing these en­zymes. A first among cul­tured ar­chaea.

MK-D1 can de­grade 2‑oxoacids hy­drolyt­i­cally (through 2‑oxoacid-for­mate lyases) or ox­ida­tively (through 2‑oxoacid:ferredoxin ox­i­dore­duc­tases) to yield acyl-CoA in­ter­me­di­ates that can be fur­ther de­graded for ATP gen­er­a­tion. In the hy­drolytic path, the car­boxy­late group of the amino acid is re­leased as for­mate that can be di­rectly handed off to part­ner­ing me­thano­genic ar­chaea or sul­fate-re­duc­ing bac­te­ria (SRB). In the ox­ida­tive path, 2‑oxoacid ox­i­da­tion is cou­pled with re­lease of amino acid car­boxy­late as CO2 and re­duc­tion of ferre­doxin, which can be re-ox­i­dized through H+ and/or CO2 re­duc­tion to H2 and for­mate, re­spectively. MK-D1 can prob­a­bly switch be­tween syn­trophic in­ter­ac­tion through 2‑oxoacid hy­drol­y­sis and ox­i­da­tion de­pend­ing on the partner(s).

In the forth­com­ing sec­ond part 2 of Cul­ti­vat­ing our An­ces­tors..., I will out­line how get­ting to know Promet­hearchaeum syntro­phicum MK-D1 has led to com­pletely new ideas about eu­karyo­ge­n­e­sis. In parts 3+4 then, I will show that P. syn­troph­icum is not a mav­er­ick among the 'As­gard' ar­chaea, but a mem­ber of a fam­ily that oc­curs all over the world with sim­i­lar phys­i­o­log­i­cal and cel­lu­lar prop­er­ties, in­clud­ing de­pen­dence on syn­tro­phy, a pen­chant for bleb­bing, and those char­ac­ter­is­tic pro­tru­sions, the "tiny arms".

  

Do you want to com­ment on this post? We would be de­lighted to hear from you! Please com­­ment be­low, or send us an email, or com­ment on Mastodon or Bluesky. We'll be post­ing com­ment threads that arise be­low (with your per­mis­sion). Feel free to sub­scribe if you'd like to get reg­u­lar no­ti­fi­ca­tions about new blog posts.

Other Posts

  • Vesic­u­la­tion: An­other Bac­te­r­ial Skill

    by Elio — Mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy, we will agree, is a vast sub­ject where many im­por­tant as­pects are likely to evade one's sight. Here's an ex­am­ple – the for­ma­tion of vesi­cles from the outer mem­brane of Gram-neg­a­tive bac­te­ria. This phe­nom­e­non, known as vesic­u­la­tion, is wide­spread and note­wor­thy for en­hanc­ing our un­der­stand­ing of bac­te­r­ial ca­pa­bil­i­ties and for…

  • The E. coli Chro­mo­some Caught in the Act of Repli­cat­ing

    Pic­tures Con­sid­ered #2 by Elio — We con­tinue our se­ries of im­ages that have made a dif­fer­ence in mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy. This one, pub­lished by John Cairns in 1963 has earned a most de­served place in text­books and re­views. It shows a ra­dioau­to­graph of an in­tact E. coli chro­mo­some in the act of repli­cat­ing. From this im­age…

  • The Hunger Games

    by Elio — I am not usu­ally drawn to start out an ar­ticle by con­si­der­ing a bac­te­ri­um's name, but when con­front­ed with Ag­gre­ga­ti­bac­ter ac­ti­no­my­ce­tem­co­mit­ans, I had to take a pause. A well-tra­vel­ed Gram-neg­a­tive coc­co­ba­cil­lus, this car­rier of such a con­vo­lut­ed mo­ni­ker start­ed life simp­ly as an Ac­ti­no­ba­cil­lus...

  • Tales of Mys­tery and Imag­i­na­tion (2/2)

    by Daniel P. Haeusser — Early at­tempts from the 1970's to de­tect pep­ti­do­gly­can in PVC su­per­phy­lum mem­bers failed, lead­ing to the ac­cepted con­clu­sion that the periplasm of the ma­jor­ity of its species lacked a cell wall. These early ex­per­i­ments in­volved clas­si­cal tech­niques of pep­ti­do­gly­can de­tec­tion through bio­che­mi­cal pu­rifi­ca­tion and char­ac­ter­i­za­tion of sac­culi, and ob­ser­va­tion by elec­tron mi­croscopy. In more re­cent years, as genome se­quenc­ing...

  • Mi­cro­bial 'Starstuff'

    by Gemma Reguera — Famed as­tronomer and writer Carl Sagan said in his book Cos­mos: "The ni­tro­gen in our DNA, the cal­cium in our teeth, the iron in our blood, the car­bon in our ap­ple pies were made in the in­te­ri­ors of col­laps­ing stars. We are made of starstuff." And so are mi­crobes, we must…

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted