An­tic­i­pat­ing Sea­sons

Note­wor­thy

Plants and an­i­mals can mea­sure dif­fer­ences in the length of days and nights – what is known as pho­tope­ri­odic time mea­sure­ment – that al­lows them to ad­just their phys­i­ol­ogy to sea­sonal changes, a re­sponse known as pho­tope­ri­odism. But bac­te­ria, with their short life spans, would not be ex­pected to have such adap­tive re­sponses to sea­sonal changes.

Syne­chococ­cus elon­ga­tus Source

A re­cent study car­ried out at Van­der­bilt Uni­ver­sity shows that cyanobac­te­ria, with genera­tion times as short as 5 to 6 hours, are ca­pa­ble of such pho­tope­ri­odic time­keep­ing. When ex­posed to short, win­ter-like days (8 hours of light fol­lowed by 16 hours of dark­ness), cyanobac­te­ria de­vel­oped en­hanced re­sis­tance to cold. This re­sponse also re­quired a func­tional cir­ca­dian clock, which is an in­ter­nal 24-hour cy­cle syn­chro­nized clock that re­sponds to changes in the en­vi­ron­ment. These short pe­ri­ods of light ex­po­sure (photo­periods) char­ac­ter­is­tic of win­ter stim­u­lated ad­just­ments in mem­brane lipids and gene ex­pres­sion, in­clud­ing path­ways in­volved in stress re­sponses.

This unan­tic­i­pated ca­pac­ity of cyanobac­te­ria to carry out pho­tope­ri­odic time­keep­ing and re­spond to sea­sonal changes sug­gests an an­cient evo­lu­tion­ary ori­gin. Be­fore the evo­lu­tion of mul­ti­cel­lu­lar­ity and eu­kary­otes, the abil­ity to re­spond to sea­sonal changes evolved in prokary­otes from pre­ex­ist­ing stress path­ways.

 

("Note­wor­thy" is the new for­mat for STC's Thurs­day posts. Please read our Jan 20, 2025 post out­lin­ing this and other changes in our blog.)

 

Other Posts

  • Fun­go­ma­nia I. Fungi Make Flow­ers

    by Elio — Na­ture seems to be in­tent in fool­ing every­one, ex­pe­ri­enced botanists in­cluded. An ex­am­ple is seen in the abil­ity of some fungi to change the ter­mi­nal leaves of cer­tain mus­tard plants into what look like flo­ral petals, mak­ing them look like real flow­ers. Pol­li­nat­ing in­sects are at­tracted to them and land on these struc­tures...

  • Genome with the Wind...

    by Jaime E. Zla­mal — When there is ge­o­graph­i­cal sep­a­ra­tion, we can an­tic­i­pate ge­netic dif­fer­ences. That's ex­actly what a team led by Kon­stan­tin Sev­eri­nov ex­pected to find when they set out to study ge­o­graph­i­cally dis­tant pop­u­la­tions of Ther­mus bac­te­ria. Af­ter all, these mi­crobes gen­er­ally live in hot springs at tem­per­a­tures around 160 de­grees Fahren­heit (~70° C). How­ever, de­spite...

  • Round­ing up the Honey Bees (1)

    by Christoph — Why would I de­vi­ate here from STC's habit to rather not fea­ture the newest re­sults of trendy re­search top­ics? The rea­son comes hid­den in a short no­tice in Sci­ence by War­ren Cornwall:"...The new re­search is cer­tain to make a con­tro­ver­sial her­bi­cide even more of a flash­point." He re­ferred, of course, to a re­cent pa­per pub­lished in PNAS...

  • A Mi­cro­bial Utopia: Cheese

    by Nathan Jayne, Amanda Alker, and Nathalie Del­herbe — Over the past decade, there have been many large scale at­tempts to char­ac­ter­ize bac­te­r­ial com­mu­ni­ties, from soil and ocean mi­cro­bio­mes to hu­man mi­cro­bio­mes. There is even a col­lec­tive ef­fort to pro­file the Earth's mi­cro­biome. Sci­en­tists are not only in­ter­ested in know­ing who is there and what they are do­ing, but also how...