On For­get­ting

by Me­chas

A re­cent es­say by Melissa Kirsch of the New York Times high­lights what seems to be a preva­lent con­cern: for­get­ful­ness. The con­stant ex­po­sure to an ever-grow­ing bar­rage of me­dia has its toll, es­pe­cially as we grow old(er). Even though re­mem­ber­ing and for­get­ting are es­sen­tial to pro­cess­ing in­for­ma­tion and learn­ing as we me­an­der through life, an ex­cess of data can re­sult in over­flow and stor­age prob­lems.

Fig.1. A Day in Data. Source. Fron­tispiece: For­get­ting. Source

The world to­day runs on data – the new global cur­rency. Ac­cord­ing to some es­ti­mates, we gen­er­ate more than 0.4 zettabytes (ZB; 1 ZB = 1021 bytes) of data daily. By the end of 2024 we will have an es­ti­mated 147 ZB of data, a sub­stan­tial in­crease from the 2 ZB in 2010. Much of this in­for­ma­tion is gen­er­ated by users around the world in the form of emails, videos, com­puter work, and so­cial me­dia. Sci­en­tific data in physics and the bi­o­log­i­cal sci­ences also rep­re­sents an im­por­tant chunk of this equa­tion. The flow of dig­i­tal informa­tion has be­come a dis­tinc­tive fea­ture of hu­man­ity to­day, a con­cept that res­onates nicely with the flow of in­for­ma­tion that un­der­lies liv­ing sys­tems as or­gan­isms in­ter­act with each other and with their en­vi­ron­ments.

Fig. 2. In­creased num­ber of schol­arly jour­nals from their birth (1665). The pre­dicted num­ber of jour­nals was cal­cu­lated based on the as­sump­tion that the num­ber of jour­nals dou­bles about every 20 years. Source

How to process all this in­for­ma­tion, let alone re­tain it? One im­por­tant re­source is, of course, the sci­en­tific lit­er­a­ture. Here again, the num­ber of jour­nals has risen dra­mat­i­cally in re­cent decades. Pe­rus­ing through ta­bles of con­tents is no longer an easy task when jour­nals now num­ber in the thou­sands. Is there an ef­fi­cient way to ac­cess in­for­ma­tion dis­trib­uted in so many jour­nals and sources? A quick search led me to iden­tify tools that could be help­ful, in ad­di­tion to my reg­u­lar go-to search en­gine in PubMed. You may have your own fa­vorite sys­tem of iden­ti­fy­ing and re­triev­ing in­for­ma­tion for your work or per­sonal in­ter­ests. But again, how can we make sense of so much in­for­ma­tion with our lim­ited time? To ad­dress this in some mea­sure, tools now in­cor­po­rate AI to sys­tem­atize and fa­cil­i­tate in­for­ma­tion pro­cess­ing and aid in tasks like sum­ma­riz­ing meet­ings and ar­ti­cles. You have prob­a­bly seen the AI as­sis­tants that now pop up dur­ing vir­tual meet­ings and those that pro­vide sum­maries and high­lights of jour­nal ar­ti­cles. Even more pow­er­ful is the idea of em­brac­ing AI tools to as­sist in the peer re­view process, which is time-con­sum­ing and in­creas­ingly dif­fi­cult due to the grow­ing vol­ume of re­search and large and com­plex datasets and analy­ses gen­er­ated by in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary teams. The sig­nif­i­cance of AI in the sci­ences is un­der­scored by this year's No­bel Prizes in Physics and Chem­istry, awarded for ground­break­ing meth­ods in ma­chine learn­ing and for ad­vance­ments in pre­dict­ing pro­tein struc­tures, re­spec­tively.

The very ex­is­tence of such an as­sort­ment of meth­ods for search­ing, re­triev­ing, and pro­cess­ing sci­en­tific lit­er­a­ture and data is symp­to­matic of the com­plex­ity un­der­ly­ing the grow­ing ecosys­tem of sci­en­tific in­for­ma­tion. It is prac­ti­cally im­pos­si­ble to re­call the specifics of the nu­mer­ous texts we read, from re­search ar­ti­cles to news out­lets and lit­er­a­ture. Yet do not de­spair, for it has been ar­gued that de­spite for­get­ting the de­tails, en­gag­ing in ac­tiv­i­ties that stim­u­late the mind will strengthen our cog­ni­tive processes.

For­get­ting is an in­evitable side ef­fect of learn­ing, es­pe­cially in these data-dri­ven times. And re­mem­ber (or for­get) that the choices we make on how to nav­i­gate the con­stant in­flux of in­for­ma­tion shape our un­der­stand­ing and chal­lenge our abil­ity to thrive within the very in­for­ma­tion ecosys­tem we have helped cre­ate.
 

 

Do you want to com­ment on this post? We would be happy about it! Please send us an email, or com­ment on Mastodon or Bluesky.
 

Other Posts