Emil­ia­nia hux­leyi : Past, Present and Fu­ture

by Roberto

Christoph re­cently brought to my at­ten­tion a re­source for any­one in­ter­ested in a brief in­tro­duc­tion to coc­col­ithophores, with par­tic­u­lar em­pha­sis on Emil­ia­nia hux­leyi. Christoph knew well that I, as a fan of this mi­croalga, would en­joy the site. This got me think­ing about Ehux (its en­dear­ing name that many use) yet once more. By the way, Ehux was named to honor Thomas Hux­ley and Ce­sare Emil­iani, two key in­ves­ti­ga­tors in the early stud­ies of the coc­col­iths found in ocean sed­i­ments. Long-time STC read­ers will know that we find Ehux fas­ci­nat­ing; there are so many past posts on it that I will not try to list them here; just google "small things con­sid­ered emil­ia­nia" and you'll see. How can one not be fas­ci­nated by Ehux? Aside from the beauty of the cal­cium car­bon­ate coc­col­iths that en­case it, its roles in the car­bon and sul­fur cy­cles make it a cur­rent player on Earth's cli­mate and its relics help in the re­con­struc­tion of past cli­mates. The last few decades have wit­nessed a huge in­crease in Ehux re­search which in turn has led to an enor­mous growth of in­ter­est in it by the pub­lic. There's now a large amount of read­ily ac­ces­si­ble in­for­ma­tion for any­one to learn as much as they want about Ehux.

Fig. 1. A scan­ning elec­tron mi­cro­graph of a sin­gle G. hux­leyi cell (Emil­ia­nia hux­leyi). Source

Thus, it was with very mixed feel­ings that in a re­cent pa­per I read the fol­low­ing state­ment: "...our phy­loge­nomic re­sults sup­port the use of the species name Gephy­ro­capsa hux­leyi in­stead of the com­monly used Emil­ia­nia hux­leyi as this lin­eage is nested within the Gephy­ro­capsa genus. Hence, we here­after use G. hux­leyi in­stead of E. hux­leyi." Good­bye Ehux, hello Ghux?? I do not ques­tion that this new pro­posed tax­on­omy ac­cu­rately re­flects phy­logeny. But it does bother me enor­mously that if the new name is widely adopted, fu­ture stu­dents may not ever study the very im­por­tant knowl­edge de­posited un­der the name Emil­ia­nia. Searches for Gephy­ro­capsa hux­leyi may not yield the wealth of in­for­ma­tion as­so­ci­ated to Emil­ia­nia hux­leyi. For a mi­crobe with such hugely im­por­tant im­pli­ca­tions in the cur­rent cli­mate change cri­sis, it would be shame to have its past for­got­ten in the fu­ture be­cause of the present name change.

 

Do you want to com­ment on this post? We would be happy about it! Please com­ment on Mastodon or on Bluesky.

Other Posts

  • En­er­get­ics of the Eu­kary­otic Edge

    by Franklin M. Harold — The most con­spic­u­ous fea­ture in the land­scape of cell evo­lu­tion is the tremen­dous rift that sep­a­rates eu­kary­otes from prokary­otes. This is not ap­par­ent at the level of ri­bo­so­mal RNA se­quences, or of mol­e­c­u­lar bi­ol­ogy in gen­eral, but leaps to the eye of any­one in­trigued by form, func­tion and evo­lu­tion­ary…

  • Com­mut­ing to Work

    by Elio — An un­der­wa­ter mi­cro­bial mat has been found in fairly shal­low wa­ters off the coast of Chile and, ac­cord­ing to head­lines, it's the size of Greece, or about 132,000 km^2 (or for us norte-amer­i­canos: about the size of Al­abama). These com­mu­ni­ties of sul­fide-ox­i­diz­ing bac­te­ria have been known for some time, but their at­ten­tion has been high­lighted...

  • Care For A Glass Of Chicha?

    by Elio — Al­co­holic bev­er­ages typ­ify hu­man so­ci­eties. Think of cham­pagne and the French, scotch and the Scot, and so on. In the West­ern re­gions of South Amer­ica, mainly Peru, Ecuador, and Colom­bia, the main ar­ti­sanal al­co­holic drink made by the na­tive peo­ple is called chicha.

  • Art on a Dish

    by Elio — Quite a few years ago, I spent some time view­ing a nat­ural his­tory-in­spired show at the Boston Mu­seum of Fine Arts. One ex­hibit that es­pe­cially caught my at­ten­tion con­sisted of a me­ter-square dish con­tain­ing what must have been EMB agar. This "plate" had been left ex­posed to the air and the en­su­ing…