Macrolides from Mol­lusks, Not Mi­crobes?

by Janie

Last year, we cov­ered the mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal im­pli­ca­tions of feather pig­ments in par­rots, touch­ing on an un­ex­pected polyke­tide syn­thase (PKS) ac­tive in an an­i­mal rather than a mi­crobe or plant. Now, a re­dux of an­i­mal polyke­tides! This episode of mol­e­cules from un­ex­pected places takes place un­der­sea, star­ring the clam.

Left: Methyl green-Py­ronin stain­ing of the man­tle mar­gin con­firms that nu­mer­ous RNA mol­e­cules (black ar­row) are present in the MpES-mRNA pos­i­tive po­si­tion. The green box in­di­cates the man­tle mar­gin. Right: FISH tar­geted to MpES mRNA on the man­tle mar­gin sec­tion. MpES an­ti­sense: FISH us­ing the probe with the re­verse com­ple­men­tary se­quence of MpES mRNA. MpES sense: FISH us­ing the probe with the same se­quence of MpES mRNA. White ar­rows: MpES mRNA. Adapted from source. Fron­tispiece: His­to­log­i­cal stain­ing of erythro­mycin in the man­tle mar­gin sec­tion. Black ar­rows in­di­cate ery­thromycin-rich struc­tures. Adapted from source.

The spot­ted hard clam Mere­trix pe­techialis, com­mer­cially cul­ti­vated along the coasts of East Asia, turns out to be of hu­man in­ter­est for more than its tasti­ness. Yue et al. (2022) spot­ted within the clam's tran­scrip­tome an mRNA en­cod­ing an ery­throno­lide syn­thase, a PKS re­spon­si­ble for pro­duc­ing an in­ter­me­di­ate in ery­thromycin biosyn­the­sis. Upon closer in­spec­tion, these tran­scripts were lo­cated only within the clam's man­tle, the soft tis­sue that peeks out be­tween the two shell halves into the sur­round­ing sea­wa­ter and se­cretes the shell-mak­ing in­gre­di­ents cal­cium car­bon­ate and con­chi­olin. Fur­ther cell-level spe­cial­iza­tion was tak­ing place here: deeper in that man­tle, within spe­cial mu­cus-se­cret­ing cells, were both the tran­scripts and ery­thromycin it­self, as ev­i­denced by mass spec, bac­te­rio­sta­tic as­says, and FISH ex­per­i­ments. The tran­script is clearly an im­por­tant player, as RNAi tar­geted to it de­creased both its own level and that of ery­thromycin. Fi­nally, a trail of ge­netic and phy­lo­ge­netic bread­crumbs sug­gested that the ery­thromycin in the clam is not of bac­te­r­ial make: primers spe­cific for the 16S ri­bo­so­mal DNA of Strep­to­myces species yielded no PCR prod­uct, and an analy­sis of SNPs in the ery­throno­lide syn­thase gene (MpES) pointed to­wards an an­i­mal ori­gin. The au­thors' con­clu­sion? Ery­thromycin – that en­tire chem­i­cal mo­saic of a mol­e­cule con­structed by a Rube-Gold­berg-es­que lineup of en­zyme do­mains – is pro­duced by the clam. Shell-shock­ing much?

It's a fas­ci­nat­ing pa­per. Ad­mit­tedly, I would have been more con­vinced if they had checked for 16S am­pli­cons from other Strep­to­myces species and tested the pro­posed role of MpES in pro­duc­ing ery­thromycin by ex­press­ing the gene in a het­erol­o­gous host.

The au­thors claim this biosyn­the­sis of ery­thromycin to be an ex­am­ple of con­ver­gent evo­lu­tion be­tween bac­te­ria and an­i­mals. It's mind­bog­gling to think about the en­tire biosyn­thetic path­way man­i­fest­ing two sep­a­rate times along the me­an­der of evo­lu­tion. Af­ter their SNP analy­sis, they re­jected the pos­si­bil­ity of gene trans­fer from mi­crobe to host, a phe­nom­e­non that is not out of the or­di­nary. One ex­am­ple: Ixodes scapu­lares ticks pos­sess a gene for an an­tibac­te­r­ial en­zyme that likely orig­i­nated from the Lyme dis­ease-caus­ing Bor­re­lia, co-opted mil­lions of years ago. Their con­clu­sions also dis­count an­other strat­egy found in in­ver­te­brates that as­so­ciate closely with bac­te­ria, the se­ques­ter­ing of mi­cro­bial nat­ural prod­ucts. One ex­am­ple: Elysia rufescens sea slugs are loaded up with de­fen­sive tox­ins that they don't pro­duce in-house but rather steal from the al­gae they eat, which in turn ac­quire those com­pounds from their bac­te­r­ial en­dosym­bionts.

Some fishy busi­ness.

 

Do you want to com­ment on this post? We would be happy about it! Please com­ment on Mastodon.

Other Posts

  • Gul­liver and the Lil­liputians

    by Elio and Merry — "Two ar­chaea walk into a bar and the bar­tender says…" No, we don't have an end­ing for this joke (tell us if you do!), but if the tem­per­a­ture of the bar were around 90°C and the lo­cal­ity a hy­drother­mal vent off Ice­land, there is a chance that the pair saun­ter­ing in could be...

  • To grow or not to grow? That is the ques­tion!

    by Roberto — What hap­pens to bac­te­r­ial pop­u­la­tions as they tran­si­tion from a state of rapid growth to lit­tle or no growth as a con­se­quence of di­min­ish­ing amounts of nu­tri­ents? It seems that every time this ques­tion is ad­dressed in a new set­ting and/or a dif­fer­ent species, some fas­ci­nat­ing new fea­tures of bac­te­r­ial adapt­abil­ity are dis­cov­ered.

  • When the Mi­crobe Hits the Metal

    by Leo Baum­gart — Some heavy met­als share a long his­tory with mi­crobes. Many of the meta­bolic processes that sus­tain life are be­lieved to have orig­i­nated from spon­ta­neous re­ac­tions in­volv­ing met­als present in the early Earth. Our mi­cro­bial an­ces­tors fig­ured out quickly how to use...

  • Borgs in Ar­chaea

    by Me­chas — Mi­crobes never cease to sur­prise, as should be ev­i­dent to long-time STC read­ers. Now we are pre­sented with a novel mech­a­nism that al­lows ar­chaea to ex­pand their gene con­tent and meta­bolic ca­pac­ity. This un­fore­seen dis­cov­ery also il­lus­trates the im­por­tance not only of hav­ing the right tools (and fund­ing) but also of be­ing pre­pared to find the un­ex­pected.

  • Fast Is Good...

    by Michael Schmidt — Every now and then you read a pa­per and think to your­self, this might trans­form pa­tient care. Such was the case when I read a pa­per sug­gested to me by one of our faith­ful TWiM (This Week in Mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy) lis­ten­ers, Dr. Volkan Ozenci of the Karolin­ska Uni­ver­sity Hos­pi­tal in Swe­den. The pa­per, 'An­tibi­otic sus­cep­ti­bil­ity...'

  • Bac­te­r­ial Blues

    by Janie — The color blue is an odd­ity. Of all pig­ments in na­ture – chem­i­cals that se­lec­tively ab­sorb and re­flect cer­tain wave­lengths of vis­i­ble light – blue ones are among the rarest. Pro­ducing blue dyes was once such a costly busi­ness that me­dieval Eu­ro­peans consid­ered it to be as pre­cious as gold...