The Krebs (Bi)Cycle

by Christoph

To­day I'm tak­ing you on a short tour, a (bi)­cycle tour. Don't be alarmed, it won't be a long ride. And no pre­vi­ous fit­ness check! You can cy­cle di­rect­ly on your screen. A mi­ni­mum of brain ac­ti­vi­ty is ex­pect­ed though. You gues­sed it, it's about the Krebs cy­cle. More pre­cise­ly: The Krebs (Bi)­Cycle (Fig­ure 1). Let's pedal!

Fig­ure 1. The Krebs Cy­cle. Anony­mous. Source The Uni­versity of Sheffield

Any­one who has ever been re­motely ex­posed to biochem­istry has heard of the Krebs cy­cle (syn­ony­mous: tricarb­ox­ylic acid (TCA) cy­cle, cit­ric acid cy­cle)... and quickly for­got­ten the eight-or-so steps it takes to go around the cir­cle once. This is reg­u­larly made fun of on the in­ter­net: "Learn Krebs Cy­cle, For­get Krebs Cy­cle, Back to Step One". So, a learn­ing aid would be help­ful, preferen­tially a vi­sual one (not only for stu­dents but also for PhDs and well be­yond). That's were 'The Krebs (Bi)­Cycle' comes in.

I have to warn you right away, how­ever, that this Fig­ure 1 is a down­right sneaky learn­ing aid, as ap­peal­ing as it looks at first glance. Mind the de­tails!

  • The name­sake Krebs cy­cle could eas­ily be de­picted as one of these fancy uni­cy­cles for acro­bats but here it's the rear wheel of the (Bi)Cycle. And there is a front wheel too, the or­nithine cy­cle! This is, of course, meant to nudge you to view ─ and learn! ─ the TCA cy­cle not in isola­tion, but with its connection(s) to other cyclic and lin­ear path­ways in cell me­ta­b­o­lism. The front wheel serves as a re­minder for this fact, de­tails can be filled-in later.
     
  • Four TCA cy­cle in­ter­me­di­ates are named on the rear tire in the right or­der of re­ac­tions, but there are eight (see Fig­ure 2). This means: start mem­o­riz­ing these four, keep in mind that the wheel is miss­ing a few spokes that can be filled-in later. Easy.
     
  • When cy­cling, you ex­ert force on the ped­als to move for­ward, the chain­ring then trans­mits power to the rear wheel via the chain. I think it's a clever lay­out idea to use the pe­dals (ADP/ ATP) and chain­ring (NAD+/NADH+H) of the bike to sym­bol­ize the power trans­fer to the rear wheel. Very de­scrip­tive but a bit too clever, be­cause ac­tu­ally the en­ergy flow in the TCA cy­cle runs the other way round: cleav­ing-off CO2 from cit­rate twice leads to the forma­tion of suc­cinate con­comi­tant with for­ma­tion of 2 NADH+H+. H+ is ex­ported via the respira­tory chain and dri­ves ATP for­ma­tion from ADP via ATP syn­thase.
     

But why is it still an ef­fi­cient learn­ing aid de­spite the flaws men­tioned? Here's why ─ but first a brief, sub­jec­tive look at learn­ing meth­ods.

Fig­ure 2. In the cit­ric acid cy­cle, the acetyl group from acetyl CoA is at­tached to a four-car­bon ox­aloac­etate mol­e­cule to form a six-car­bon cit­rate mol­e­cule. Through a se­ries of steps, cit­rate is oxi­dized, re­leas­ing two car­bon diox­ide mo­le­cules for each acetyl group fed into the cy­cle. In the process, three NAD+ mole­cules are re­duced to NADH, one FAD mo­lecule is re­duced to FADH2, and one ATP or GTP (de­pend­ing on the cell type) is pro­duced (by sub­strate-level phosphory­lation). Be­cause the fi­nal prod­uct of the cit­ric acid cy­cle is also the first re­ac­tant, the cy­cle runs con­tin­u­ously in the pre­sence of suf­fi­cient re­ac­tants. (Credit: mod­i­fi­ca­tion of work by "Yikrazuul"/Wi­kimedia Com­mons). Source

You can, of course, learn the eight steps of the TCA cy­cle by rote, like a poem. The more lay­ers (num­ber of C atoms, names of en­zymes, even chem­i­cal for­mu­lae, etc.) you pack into your eight steps of the cy­cle, the more likely it is that the hum­ble poem will turn into a full-blown Irish bal­lad (as here). This makes mem­o­riza­tion very vis­cous even when us­ing mnemon­ics. Some peo­ple suc­ceed in mem­o­riz­ing an im­age vi­su­ally ─ say, Fig­ure 2 here ─ in such a last­ing way that they are able to re­pro­duce it flaw­lessly at any time. I, for ex­am­ple, can do this quite well, but I have fallen flat on my face time and again when it was nec­es­sary ─ and it al­ways is when it comes to sci­ence ─ to make cor­rec­tions to a once "per­ma­nently saved" im­age. Yet, whether you memo­rize the TCA cy­cle vi­su­ally or as a bal­lad, the biggest catch is that your mem­ory can only deal with this big chunk if you more or less dis­re­gard all the import­ant ins & outs (this may not be true for some neu­ro­di­verse peo­ple, for ex­am­ple, those with As­perger syn­drome).

It is the "ins & outs" that make what is ac­tu­ally a bor­ing traf­fic cir­cle (Am.) or round­about (Br.) so ex­cit­ing ─ I beg your par­don, Sir Hans ─ as all ma­jor meta­bolic path­ways (sug­ars, amino acids, nu­cleotides, lipids) pass across the TCA cy­cle on their an­a­bolic and/or cata­bolic routes at least once. And this is the rea­son why I think 'The Krebs (Bi)Cycle' is, a bit counter-in­tu­itively, such a good learn­ing aid: the rear wheel is only a sketch, but the ped­als and the bi­cy­cle frame point to im­por­tant "ins & outs" at the right places as does the front wheel, the or­nithine cy­cle. You have to ac­tively as­sem­ble the bike your­self from loose parts (text­books, re­views, origi­nal pa­pers) guided by this min­i­mal con­struc­tion man­ual. Thus you get to know the "sol­der­ing points" much bet­ter than is pos­si­ble by rote learn­ing or vi­sual mem­o­riza­tion. Don't worry, you won't for­get again ever!

Med­ical stu­dents are well served with the "clas­sic" TCA cy­cle that runs en­tirely, for ex­am­ple, in mus­cle tis­sue; anatom­i­cally more pre­cise: in the mi­to­chon­dr­ial ma­trix (=cy­to­plasm) of an­i­mal cells. Thus 'The Krebs (Bi)Cycle' is a good start point for learn­ing. For bi­ol­ogy stu­dents there is an ad­di­tion­al perk. We now know that for the TCA cy­cle in an­i­mals a whole set of "vari­a­tions on a theme," shunts and short­cuts, up to and in­clud­ing a re­verse TCA cy­cle, ex­ist in plants, fungi, pro­tists, bac­teria, and ar­chaea. It is fairly easy to ac­com­mo­date these other mod­ules within the min­i­mal con­struc­tion man­ual of 'The Krebs (Bi)Cycle' as a start point for learn­ing.

If you have had enough  of cy­cling now, or just need a 10-min break, I rec­om­mend for relaxa­tion the es­say Krebs and his trin­ity of cy­cles by Sir Hans Ko­rn­berg (not re­lated to the Ko­rn­bergs of DNA and RNA poly­merase fame). The au­thor, a stu­dent and long-time col­lab­o­ra­tor of Hans Krebs, not only pro­vides a thor­ough overview of the cru­cial ex­per­i­ments that led to the de­cod­ing of the TCA cy­cle, but also plugs-in the other two cy­cles: the gly­oxy­late cy­cle and the or­nithine cy­cle (that's a good part of the "ins & outs"!).

A light fi­nal re­mark  'The Krebs (Bi)Cycle' I've been talk­ing about ex­ists in a larger ver­sion too: Bri­tain's biggest bi­cy­cle, twice the size of the Cerne Ab­bas gi­ant (Dorset, UK). In 2014, when the Tour de France started in Leeds for once, The Uni­ver­sity of Sheffield, UK, com­mis­sioned it as a homage to Sir Hans Krebs (1900─1981), their No­bel Prize win­ning alum­nus. Note that the de­sign­ers had changed the lay­out ever so slightly: the big­ger bike has no handbrake(s) but two han­dle­bars off­set in perspec­tive in­stead of one (ha! no hints to me­tab­o­lism what­so­ever). I can imag­ine that Sir Hans would have liked both ver­sions, he was a fan of bi­cy­cles, al­beit those with mo­tors.

 

Other Posts