Strep­to­myces spores tak­ing a ride...

Note. Trans­fer­ring our more than 2,000 posts from one plat­form to an­other, Word­Press, is a cum­ber­some task. Thus, many of our posts still con­tain bro­ken links. We will fix this one by one. We ask for your pa­tience.

by Christoph

Strep­to­mycetes, these non-motile Acti­nobac­te­ria that are ca­pa­ble of mycelial growth much like fungi, are quite in­ventive when it comes to the dis­tri­b­u­tion of their spores. They don't just rely on en­chant­ing scents like geosmin that they emit to at­tract spring­tails, which trans­port their spores over long dis­tances (see Roberto's re­cent post). They also rou­tinely em­ploy bac­te­r­ial trans­port work­ers with which they share their habi­tat in the soil, for exam­ple Bacil­lus sub­tilis. In a fresh preprint, Alise Muok, Den­nis Claessen and Ari­ane Briegel from Lei­den Uni­ver­sity, The Nether­lands, de­scribe how this "trans­port com­pany" works. Spoiler: it works re­mark­ably well since swarm­ing B. sub­tilis cells, "swim­ming" in low-con­cen­tra­tion agar on plates by fla­gel­lar move­ment, can drag Strep­to­myces coe­licolor spores over dis­tances of ~10 cm (a limit given by the dia­meter of the Petri dishes used.)

Fig­ure 1. S. coeli­color (Sc) spores are trans­port­ed by B. sub­tilis (Bs). A When Sc and Bs are in­noculated on the cen­ter of a swarm plate, visi­ble Sc colonies (white dots) are ap­par­ent and are only dis­persed in the pres­ence of motile Bs. Left: Sc with Bs. Mid­dle: Sc alone. Right: Bs alo­ne. B When Sc and Bs are in­noc­u­lated in differ­ent po­si­tions on swarm plates, the Sc colonies are dis­persed in the swarm­ing di­rec­tion of the Bs cells (black ar­rows). As­ter­isks de­note the Bs in­noc­u­la­tion sites. Source

Un­in­ten­tional "dis­tri­b­u­tion" of spores on a Petri dish with cul­ture medium is a con­stant an­noy­ance for every micro­biologist − who hasn't seen these suspi­cious spi­ralling "run­ning tracks" of small in­sects on plates af­ter a few days of in­cu­ba­tion at room tem­per­a­ture? All kid­ding aside, Muok et al. took care to de­termine the di­rec­tion in which dis­per­sal of S. spores by co-in­oc­u­lated B. sub­tilis oc­curred: al­ways in the di­rec­tion of move­ment of the swar­ming bacilli af­ter pass­ing the Strep­to­myces colony (Fig­ure 1).

Fig­ure 2. Mi­croscopy meth­ods in­di­cate that Sc spores di­rectly ad­here to Bs fla­gella. A Fluores­cence mi­croscopy of dye-la­beled spores with un­labeled Bs cells demon­strate that the spores lo­cal­ize to the cell poles of Bs. B Cryo-elec­tron mi­croscopy sam­ples of mixed Sc spores and Bs cells re­veal that the spores do not di­rectly ad­he­re to the Bs cell body. C Cryo-EM shows the Bs fla­gella colo­cal­ize with the Sc spore coat. Source

How on earth can B. sub­tilis trans­port a Strep­to­myces spore that has ap­prox­i­mately its own weight? B. sub­tilis' sit­u­a­tion is largely com­pa­ra­ble to that of a prison in­mate who is pre­vented from run­ning away by ball and chain-type shack­les. If he takes the ball with his hands close to his body, he might suc­ceed, right? And in­deed, Muok et al. found by mi­croscopy that the Strep­to­myces spores are pref­er­en­tially found near the fla­gel­lated pole of B. sub­tilis cells (Fi­gure 2 A+B) and at­tached to fla­gella (Fi­gure 2 C). "Run­ning away" for B. sub­tilis means pro­pelling with its fla­gel­lum, and this may ac­tu­ally work quite well: Schuech et al. (2019) cal­cu­lated that the ef­fi­ciency of bac­terial swim­ming is largely in­de­pen­dent of cell shape but re­quires that the cen­ter of mass is in an op­ti­mal dis­tance to the ro­ta­tional axis, the mem­brane-an­chored fla­gel­lar mo­tor, and de­pends on fla­gel­lum length in ad­di­tion (see here a stun­ning sim­u­la­tion of a "bac­te­r­ial race".)

How do Strep­to­myces spores "stick" to B. sub­tilis fla­gella? The spores pos­sess, in ad­di­tion to a tight-fit­ting coat, a pro­teina­ceous one­sie as out­most layer that is bet­ter de­scribed as a loose gore­tex pon­cho as it is eas­ily dis­rupted dur­ing prepa­ra­tion of the spores for cryo-ET. This pon­cho, termed rodlet layer, is a fib­ril­lar mesh­work of oligomer­ized rodlin and chap­lin pro­teins (Fig­ure 3). The hy­dropho­bic rodlin pro­teins oli­go­merize to form the name­giv­ing rodlets, while the chap­lins are thought to link such rodlets to pairs.

Fig­ure 3. A SEM of WT Sc spores shows the rod­let layer with pair-wise rodlets of 20 nm spac­ing. B Freeze-frac­tur­ing of Sc spore shows rod­let layer on spore sur­face. C Cryo-ET recon­struc­tions show that fla­gella pref­er­en­tially in­teract with the rodlet layer (n = 12). D Segmen­tation of the re­con­struc­tion from C clearly de­monstrates the flagella:rodlin in­ter­ac­tion. Pur­ple: rodlet layer, Yel­low: fla­gella. A−D Scale bar: 100 nm. A,C,D: Source, B: Source

It is not known ex­actly how the rodlin oligomers "recog­nize" a B. sub­tilis fla­gel­lum but it is cer­tainly not a highly spe­cific pro­tein-pro­tein in­ter­ac­tion. For one, Muok et al. found that the spores of other Strep­to­myces species, in­cluding S. ten­dae, S. griseus, and S. sca­bies, are sim­i­larly dragged across plates by B. sub­tilis in swarm as­says de­spite their or­thol­o­gous rodlin pro­teins be­ing only ~35% sim­i­lar but hav­ing much the same "slit width" of rodlet pairs of ~20 nm. In­ter­est­ingly, spores of Strep­to­myces aver­mi­tilis that nat­u­rally lack rodlin are not trans­ported by B. sub­tilis, com­pa­ra­ble to those of a S. coeli­color Δrd­lAB mu­tant lack­ing rodlets. Sec­ond, Pseudomonas flu­o­rescens trans­ports Strep­to­myces spores via their fla­gella as ef­fi­ciently as B. sub­tilis. And lastly, rodlin and chap­lin ho­mologs are not con­fined to bac­te­ria but like­wise found in − bet­ter: on − spores of sev­eral Ascomy­cetes (Fungi). I can imag­ine, but not prove, that the mo­lecular in­ter­ac­tion of the bac­te­r­ial fla­gel­lum with the Strep­to­myces spore "pon­cho" is sim­i­lar to pro­tein vel­cro, that is, based on van der Waals forces (in short: 'hydro­phobic' mo­lecular in­ter­ac­tions not in­volv­ing ions or wa­ter) that are now known to be the rea­son why geckos can eas­ily walk on smooth sur­faces and up­side down on ceil­ings.

While study­ing the re­port of Muok et al., the joy they must have had while per­form­ing swarm­ing as­says with S. coeli­color and B. sub­tilis res­onated with me, and, no, this was not due to traces of geos­min (the preprint is Open Ac­cess.) You can sense this joy also in a STC post from 2011 by Elio, in which he de­scribes ex­per­i­ments with swarm­ing bac­te­ria, Pro­teus, he had per­formed to­geth­er with his col­lab­o­ra­tor Dana Boyd, and where he also fea­tures the ex­cit­ing work of In­g­hama et al. (2011), who had stud­ied the trans­port of As­pergillus fu­mi­ga­tus (As­comycetes) spores by Paeniba­cillus vor­tex, a motile Fir­mi­cutes bac­terium like B. sub­tilis.

 

 

Other Posts

  • Mea­sur­ing Up

    by Jamie Henzy — One could say that bac­te­ria get quite a bit more at­ten­tion than viruses here at STC. In fact, one could say that they hog the lime­light, chew­ing the scenery and mug­ging for the cam­era while viruses, like stepchil­dren of a stage mom, hang back­stage as un­der­stud­ies. So let's en­gage in an in­clu­sive fam­ily ac­tiv­ity, in which both bac­te­ria and viruses can par­tic­i­pate.

  • The Mesel­son-Stahl Ex­per­i­ment

    Pic­tures Con­sid­ered #17 by Elio — De­scribed as the "Most Beau­ti­ful Ex­per­i­ment In Bi­ol­ogy" the demon­stra­tion by Mesel­son and Stahl that DNA repli­cates semi­con­ser­v­a­tively is one of the ma­jor land­marks in the gen­e­sis of mod­ern bi­ol­ogy. And in­deed it is most pleas­ing, both vi­su­ally and cere­brally...

  • Of Terms in Bi­ol­ogy: Di­a­zotroph

    by Roberto — It all started with my want­ing to write a post on Fran­kia. I did what I al­ways do when think­ing of a new post. I googled 'small things con­sid­ered frankia'. Noth­ing. Good start, I can dive in­to the topic. Next, I thought let's put Frankia in the con­text of prior posts. I googled 'small things con­sid­ered rhi­zo­bium'. Noth­ing again...

  • Evo­lu­tion-Proof­ing An­tibi­otics

    by Vil­helmi­ina Haav­isto — Since the dis­co­ve­ry of pe­ni­cil­lin and its de­vel­op­ment in­to a the­ra­peu­tic agent, an­ti­bio­tics have re­vo­lu­tion­ized me­di­cine and saved count­less lives. How­ever, the way we use these life-sav­ing me­di­cat­ions is fun­da­men­tal­ly un­sus­tain­able as pa­tho­gens ra­pid­ly evolve re­sist­ance, ren­der­ing ma­ny se­ri­ous in­fect­ions ef­fect­ive­ly un­treat­able.

  • Death by Spe­cial De­liv­ery

    by Merry Youle — If you were a lyso­gen, that is, a bac­terium car­ry­ing a pro­phage nes­tled in your chro­mo­some, you might be hos­ting a trai­tor who will some day turn on you and kill you. On the other hand, you might be car­ry­ing the in­ad­ver­tent donor of valu­able genes that will ben­e­fit...

  • Fun­gal Cuckoo

    by Elio — Cuckoo birds have an un­sa­vory rep­u­ta­tion for lay­ing their eggs in some­body else's nest. There the eggs are tended with care by duped sur­ro­gate par­ents. When hatched, the young cuck­oos un­cer­e­mo­ni­ously push their nest­mates over the edge and, in a case of con­sum­mate avian chutz­pah, open their maw to...