Of Terms in Bi­ol­ogy: Col­icins, Bac­te­ri­ocins, Py­ocins and Tai­locins

by Roberto

This is the tale of the tail, of a phage. Years be­fore Alexan­der Fleming's chance dis­cov­ery of peni­cillin, many sci­en­tists were al­ready in­ter­ested in bac­te­ri­olytic ac­tiv­i­ties. Bac­te­rio­phages played a big role in the early days of searches for bac­te­r­ial killers. Fe­lix D'Herelle's 1917 dis­cov­ery of bac­te­rio­phages was pre­ceded by a re­port in 1896 by Ernest Han­kin of a fil­tra­ble agent found in Ganges River wa­ter that killed Vib­rio cholerae. Then, of course, there was Fred­er­ick Twort's 1915 pub­li­ca­tion de­scrib­ing a fil­tra­ble agent ca­pa­ble of lysing staphy­lo­cocci. But Twort fa­vored the ex­pla­na­tion that this lytic ac­tiv­ity was an en­zyme and thus D'Herelle did not buy into the idea that bac­te­rio­phages were widely dis­trib­uted. But a few years later, a lesser known player, An­dré Gra­tia, be­came fas­ci­nated with bac­te­ri­olytic ac­tiv­i­ties. Gra­tia put two and two to­gether and nicely showed that Twort's ac­tiv­ity was in­deed due to a bac­te­rio­phage.

Gratia's in­ter­ests in bac­te­ri­olytic ac­tiv­i­ties led him to de­velop key rapid screen­ing tech­niques for de­tect­ing them. Soon, he re­al­ized that there were not only bac­te­rio­phages, there were also pro­teins able to kill bac­te­ria. In 1925, Gra­tia pub­lished the beau­ti­fully ti­tled and stun­ning ar­ti­cle: "Sur un re­mar­quable ex­em­ple d'antagonisme en­tre deux souches de col­ibacille," wherein he de­scribes "fac­tor V," made by one strain of "col­ibacille" (nowa­days known as Es­cherichia coli) and ca­pa­ble of killing an­other strain of the same species. Re­mark­able as this dis­cov­ery was, it was not un­til 1946 that Pierre Fred­er­icq, a stu­dent and long time col­lab­o­ra­tor of Gratia's, would come up with the term "col­icin," to de­scribe highly spe­cific an­tibi­otic sub­stances made by some strains of E. coli ca­pa­ble of killing other strains of E. coli.

Fig­ure 1. Early (1964) elec­tron mi­cro­graph of py­ocin (adapted from Source)

Other in­ves­ti­ga­tors be­came in­ter­ested in col­icin-like sub­stances made by other bac­te­ria. Quickly it be­came ap­par­ent that one could pu­rify such spe­cific killing sub­stances from many species. Funny thing was, in most cases, their syn­the­sis was in­duced by the very same treat­ments that in­duced the pro­duc­tion of bac­te­rio­phage from lyso­gens, for ex­am­ple UV light or DNA dam­ag­ing com­pounds. This led none other than Fran­cois Ja­cob (along with Lwoff, Simi­novitch and Woll­man) to pro­pose, in an ar­ti­cle en­ti­tled "Déf­i­ni­tion de quelques ter­mes re­lat­ifs a la lysogénie," the term bac­te­ri­ocin to de­scribe bac­te­ri­olytic pro­teins such as the col­icins whose syn­the­sis, much like prophage in­duc­tion, kills the bac­terium pro­duc­ing it. They clearly saw a con­nec­tion be­tween bac­te­ri­olytic pro­teins and bac­te­rio­phage. But alas! Nowa­days, the term bac­te­ri­ocin is much more loosely used be­cause we now know that there are many pro­teins made by bac­te­ria with an­tibac­te­r­ial ac­tiv­ity but whose syn­the­sis is not lethal. But, the story goes full cir­cle be­cause there is still a con­nec­tion be­tween some bac­te­ri­ocins and bac­te­rio­phage…

Soon af­ter defin­ing the term bac­te­ri­ocin, in 1954, Ja­cob dis­cov­ered a killing sub­stance from Pseudomonas py­ocyanea (now known as Pseudomonas aerug­i­nosa). Fol­low­ing the bac­te­ri­ocin nam­ing con­ven­tion, Ja­cob called this sub­stance py­ocin. Since then, sev­eral  py­ocins have been de­scribed. But some of them, in­clud­ing the one orig­i­nally dis­cov­ered by Ja­cob, are par­tic­u­larly re­mark­able be­cause they con­sti­tute that con­nec­tion be­tween bac­te­ri­ocins and bac­te­rio­phage. As soon as peo­ple be­gan pu­ri­fy­ing and char­ac­ter­iz­ing py­ocins it be­came clear that they were "weird." They were of ex­tremely high mol­e­c­u­lar weight. But, most amaz­ingly, when im­aged un­der the elec­tron mi­cro­scope in the 1960s, they looked just like bac­te­rio­phage tails!

Even­tu­ally, it would be shown that py­ocins were in­deed phage tails, en­coded from chro­mo­so­mal gene clus­ters that were the rem­nants of prophages, now ded­i­cated to syn­the­siz­ing killer tails. For years they con­tin­ued to be called py­ocins but, as more and more ex­am­ples from dif­fer­ent species were iden­ti­fied, Ja­son Gill and Ry Young in 2011 pro­posed the term "tai­locins" to de­scribe the killer tails. The term seems to be catch­ing on though not com­pletely, py­ocin is still widely used. Of course, this won­der­ful evo­lu­tion­ary co-opt­ing of parts of a bac­te­rio­phage to yield a killing sub­stance has not es­caped our at­ten­tion here at STC as Merry twice de­scribed the ac­tions of tai­locins in the past (see here and here). So, there you have it, the de­tails of the tale of the killer phage tails through the trail of how they got their name.

 

Other Posts