Snack­ing on this­tles (first bite)

by Christoph

Way back in 1936, the zo­ol­o­gist H.-J. Stam­mer pub­lished a study of var­i­ous bee­tles of the Cas­sid­i­nae fam­ily (or­der Co­le­o­ptera) and their mi­cro­bial sym­bionts. Among them was the this­tle tor­toise bee­tle, Cas­sida ru­big­i­nosa (front­ispiece), an ob­lig­ate fo­liovore, or put an­other way, a dedi­ca­ted ve­gan with a pen­chant for this­tles (Cir­sium sp.). This­tles were a pest for farm­ers in the pre-Roundup™ age, and some de­li­be­rately dis­trib­uted C. ru­big­i­nosa in their grain fields to keep their growth at bay. To­day, or­ganic farm­ers are again aware of the ben­e­fi­cial ac­tion of these bee­tles in pro­tect­ing their crops (and con­sider Roundup™ a pest). Beauty and pests are, as al­ways, in the eye of the be­holder: an­other mem­ber of this fam­ily of ve­g­ans with 419 de­scribed species, Cas­sida vit­tata, snacks on sugar beet (Beta vul­garis) and is consi­de­r­ed a pest by farm­ers in the Mediter­ranean and the Mid­dle East.

Fig­ure 1. Cas­sida viridis (left) con­tains sym­bionts like Cas­sida ru­big­i­nosa, while Cas­sida neb­u­losa (right) is sym­biont-free. "Mit­tel­darm­blind­säcke" ('FG apps') and "Vagi­nalschläuche" ('OV vag tub­es') present in C. viridis (white ar­rows) but lack­ing in C. neb­u­losa (empty ar­rows). Source. Front­page: this­tle tor­toise bee­tle Cas­sida ru­big­i­nosa. Length ca. 8 mm. ©2010 Carol Senske

In his­to­log­i­cal thin sec­tions, Stam­mer found bac­te­r­ial sym­bionts in two spe­cial­ized or­gans of C. ru­big­i­nosa, C. viridis, and three other Cas­sid­i­nae: in the "Mitteldarm­blindsäcke", ap­pen­dices at the lower part of the foregut (or at the up­per midgut, but I won't start ar­gu­ing with anatomists), and in the "Vagi­nalschläuche", ap­pen­dices of the vagina in fe­males. As both or­gans will be men­tioned through­out this and the fol­low-up text yet their names are a pain even for (my) Ger­man ears fa­mil­iar with long com­posite nouns, I will re­fer to the for­mer as 'FG apps', and to the lat­ter as 'OV vag tubes' (you can lo­cal­ize them in Fig­ure 1 to not get lost in in­sect anatomy). Fun fact: the 'OV vag tubes' in C. viridis were first de­scribed by the French zo­ol­o­gist Du­four in 1825, six years be­fore Dar­win em­barked on his voy­age with HMS Bea­gle.

Fig­ure 2. Sec­tion of the Cas­sida viridis 'FG apps'. In­tra­cal­lu­lar sym­bionts are vis­i­ble in vac­uoles of the ep­ithe­lial cells. Note the pair­wise arrange­ment of the 'FG apps' with the thin sep­tum in be­tween. Source

In­ter­est­ingly, Stam­mer did not find these two conspicu­ous struc­tures in C. neb­u­losa and C. flave­ola, two Cassi­dinae species that he both found to be sym­biont-free. He con­clu­ded, with a whiff of frus­tra­tion: "The si­mul­ta­ne­ous ab­sence of both or­gans is very strik­ing and shows the close re­la­tion­ship be­tween them. Un­for­tu­nately, it can­not be de­cided whether there is no sym­bio­sis be­cause the or­gans are mis­­sing or whether the or­gans are mis­sing be­cause there is no sym­bio­sis" (author's trans­la­tion). While he ob­served the C. viridis sym­bionts in­side vacu­oles of ep­ithe­lial cells of the 'FG apps' (Fig­ure 2) they were ex­tra­cel­lu­lar in high num­bers and cov­ered by a vagi­nal se­cre­tion in the lu­men of the 'OV vag tubes' (Fi­gure 3A). Ver­ti­cal trans­mis­sion, to use present-day ter­minology, is ap­par­ently as­sured when eggs leave the va­gina with a "caplet" at the an­te­rior pole, a patch of se­cre­tion-cov­ered sym­bionts (Fig­ure 3B), and the sym­bionts gob­bled up by the hatch­ing lar­vae not much later (4 days up to 2 weeks, de­pend­ing on tem­per­a­ture). But why do C. viridis and C. ru­big­i­nosa put so much ef­fort into of­fer­ing their sym­bionts a "safe haven" by chang­ing their own mor­phol­ogy – as com­pared to their sym­biont-free cousins C. neb­u­losa and C. flave­ola – and safe­guard their ver­ti­cal trans­mis­sion by cov­er­ing them in a se­cre­tion "caplet" that hatch­ing lar­vae can't miss to eat? Stam­mer did not touch this topic, but it's not far-fetched to guess that it has some­thing to do with nu­tri­tion...

Fig­ure 3. A Sec­tion of the C. viridis 'OV vag tubes' show­ing the sym­bionts in the lu­men. B batch of C. viridis eggs with the promi­nent sym­biont-con­­tain­ing "caplet" on top. Source

Her­biv­o­rous arthro­pods, ve­gan in­sects, come in two fla­vors, or call it "tribes" mi­nus a phy­lo­ge­netic con­no­ta­tion. One tri­be, the fans of junk food, have de­vel­oped in­tri­cate drilling tools in their mouth parts that al­low them to pierce plant phloem cells and suck the su­crose-rich sap con­tained with­in. But since they can't sur­vive by nip­ping on a sugar-rich soft drink they de­pend on bac­te­r­ial sym­bionts that con­tribute es­sen­tial nu­tri­ents and metaboli­tes, in many cases amino acids and vi­t­a­mins. The other tribe is more into whole­food but faces the prob­lem of get­ting ac­cess to the highly nu­tri­ti­ous plant cell con­tent that is con­cealed be­hind the cell wall, a pectin ma­trix ri­gidified by in­ter­wo­ven cel­lu­lose and hemi­cel­lulose threads. Ap­pro­pri­ate tools to break down plant cell walls en­zy­mat­i­cally are pecti­nases, but pec­tinase genes don't be­long to the "ba­sic equip­ment" of in­sect genomes. How­ever, with such genes pre­sent in nu­mer­ous fun­gal and bac­te­r­ial genomes, two so­lu­tions are at hand for the al­ways-hun­gry ve­gan in­sects: ac­quire pecti­nase genes by hori­zontal gene trans­fer (HGT) or hire a sym­biont. Pecti­nase genes (plural) be­cause there are, ba­si­cally, two types known: PG and PL, which tar­get the most abun­dant pec­tin vari­ants, ho­mo­galac­tur­o­nan and rhamno­galac­tur­o­nan I. The stick in­sects (Phas­ma­todea) – or more pre­cisely: their com­mon an­ces­tor – solved the prob­lem once and for all by HGT from a close rel­a­tive of the Enterobacteria­ceae Er­winia or Pan­toeae (see here in STC). Sim­i­larly, wee­vils (Cur­culionoidea), long-horn bee­tles, and leaf bee­tles (Chrysomeloidea) share a set of ho­mol­o­gous pecti­nase genes, who­se ori­gin can be at­trib­uted to HGT from an as­comycete ~200 mil­lion years ago.

In the fol­low-up, 'Snack­ing on this­tles (sec­ond bite)', I will come back to the above "why"-question and dis­cuss a very re­cent study pre­sent­ing ev­i­dence that C. ru­big­i­nosa chose the sec­ond op­tion, that is, hi­ring a pecti­nase-pro­fi­cient sym­biont.

 

Other Posts