Fun­go­ma­nia I. The Yeast and the Bee.

Fun­go­ma­nia re­turns… In keep­ing with what we did a year ago, we of­fer three con­sec­u­tive fun­gal posts.

by Elio

I have ear­lier pro­fessed shar­ing with many a fas­ci­na­tion for sym­bioses (see here). I still don't know why this is, per­haps it's sim­ply be­cause mul­ti­ple genomes in­ter­act­ing are more ex­cit­ing than one. Sym­bioses come in all col­ors and stripes, and, most likely, no liv­ing thing is free of them. Among the ex­cit­ing ex­am­ples, one that stands out is the re­quire­ment of sym­bionts for bi­o­log­i­cal dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion. In many an­i­mals, such as cer­tain ma­rine corals, tube­worms, and in­sects, sym­bi­otic mi­crobes are re­quired for the de­vel­op­ment of their lar­vae. Here I present yet an­other such ex­am­ple. In cer­tain bees, yeasts are re­quired for the lar­vae to form.

Fig­ure 1. Char­ac­ter­is­tics of S. de­pilis and its food-fun­­gus. (a) S. de­pilis in the en­trance of the colony. (b) Brood cells with newly emerged bees. © Zygo­sac­charomyces sp. pseudomy­celium in­side S. de­pilis brood cells. (d) Scan­ning elec­tron mi­croscopy of S. de­pilis brood cell fun­gus. Source

The in­sects in this story be­long to a spe­cial group, the Brazil­ian stin­g­less bees. The lar­vae of one kind, Scap­totrig­ona de­pilis, need to eat a cer­tain yeast in or­der to de­velop fur­ther. The lar­vae ac­quire this sym­biont shortly af­ter the eggs hatch, the fun­gus be­ing present in the hive's brood cells. In­deed, these lar­val lodg­ings show fuzzy fun­gal growth.

In in­sects, meta­mor­pho­sis de­pends on so called ecdys­teroids, which are molt­ing hor­mones in­volved the de­vel­op­ment process. In­sects can­not make steroids, al­though if steroids are added nu­tri­tion­ally, in­sects will con­vert them into ecdys­teroids. In the case of these bees, er­gos­terol, the ecdys­teroids-pre­cur­sor, is sup­plied by the in­gested yeasts. (You may ask, why didn't the bees learn how to make the pre­cur­sor steroid them­selves? Good ques­tion.)

Fig­ure 2. Zy­gosac­cha­romyces sp. lipid droplets and S. de­pilis pu­pa­tion ex­per­i­ments. (a) Flu­o­res­cence mi­croscopy of Zy­gosac­cha­romyces sp. fixed cells stained by Nile Red to show the pres­ence of cy­to­plas­mic lipid droplets un­der lab­o­ra­tory con­di­tions and (b) nat­ural con­di­tions (cells of the fun­gus col­lected di­rectly from brood cells of S. de­pilis). © Dif­fer­ent stages of lar­val de­vel­op­ment: (i) 1–2 days-old egg, (ii) 3–4 day-old egg, (iii) 1 day-old larva, (iv) 3–4 day-old lar­vae (Zygosaccha­romyces sp. growth ob­served), (v) 6–10 day-old larva, (vi) 15–18 day-old pre-pupa, (vii) 20–25 day-old pupa, (viii) 30–34 day-old pupa, (ix) 35–40 day-old emerg­ing bee. (d) Per­cent­age of lar­vae that com­pleted meta­morphosis in vitro with­out mi­croor­gan­ism in­oc­u­la­tion (first bar), with fun­gus col­lected di­rectly from brood cells (sec­ond bar) and with iso­lated Zy­gosac­cha­romyces sp. SDBC30G1, cul­ti­vated in lab­o­ra­tory (third bar), in three dif­fer­ent ex­per­i­ments (N = 48 per treat­ment). (e) Per­cent­age of lar­vae that com­pleted meta­mor­pho­sis in vitro with­out fun­gal or sterol in­oc­u­la­tion (first bar), with fun­gus col­lected di­rectly from brood cells (sec­ond bar) and with er­gos­terol at 2.5 µM added in the lar­val food (third bar), in three dif­fer­ent ex­per­i­ments (N = 48 per treat­ment). (f) Chem­i­cal struc­tures of er­gos­terol, cho­lesterol, 24-epi-mak­is­terone A and 20-hy­drox­y­ecdy­­so­ne. Source

A multi­na­tional group of re­searchers suc­ceeded in iso­lat­ing a yeast from the stin­g­less bees' brood cells. In­ter­est­ingly these did not grow on reg­u­lar me­dia. But re­al­iz­ing that brood cells con­tain a lot of rich food and have high os­motic pres­sure, they used a medium con­tain­ing 30% glu­cose and a low pH. Suc­cess. They grew colonies of mem­bers of the genus Zy­gosac­cha­romyces. These iso­lates showed un­usual cul­tural prop­er­ties not pre­vi­ously known for this genus, such as mak­ing fil­a­ments called pseudomycelia. Usu­ally, these struc­tures are com­posed of chains of yeast cells but here no septa were seen. Also, these yeasts 'in­vade' the agar, pen­e­trat­ing be­neath its sur­face, which may be sim­i­lar to the re­quired pen­e­tra­tion of the wax bar­rier in the brood cells. Fur­ther­more, these yeast cells con­tain abun­dant lipid droplets, sug­gest­ing that they may be of nu­tri­tional value to the lar­vae. As the au­thors say: "All these growth char­ac­ter­is­tics show Zy­gosac­cha­romyces sp. adap­ta­tion to sur­vive and pro­lif­er­ate in­side S. de­pilis brood cells, fur­ther sup­port­ing the speci­ficity of this sym­bio­sis."

The role of the yeasts in lar­val de­vel­op­ment could be demon­strated di­rectly, start­ing out with the bee eggs, which are nat­u­rally fun­gus free, and adding to them pure cul­tures of the yeast. Some 70% of these eggs went on to meta­mor­phose into lar­vae, as op­posed to 6% for fun­gus-free con­trols. That steroids are in­volved was shown by ex­tract­ing lipids from these Zy­gosac­cha­romyces yeasts and find­ing that er­gos­terol is the prin­ci­pal com­po­nent. Strik­ingly, adding 2.5 μM pu­ri­fied er­gos­terol had the same ef­fect as adding the yeasts.

This in­ter­est­ing sym­bio­sis is prob­a­bly not lim­ited to the bees stud­ied here be­cause phy­lo­ge­netic analy­sis sug­gest that other cases prob­a­bly ex­ist. In­deed, it would be sur­pris­ing if such a re­la­tion­ship, once evolved, had been used in one in­stance only. One prac­ti­cal con­se­quence of this study is to be­ware of the use of an­ti­fun­gal pes­ti­cides, which should be care­fully eval­u­ated if used in the rear­ing of bees.

 

(Dis­clo­sure: One of the au­thors of this pa­per is our own Roberto Kolter)

  

Other Posts

  • Cul­ti­vat­ing the An­ces­tors (4|4)

    by Christoph — Hav­ing 1 or 2 'As­gard' ar­chaea un­der the mi­cro­scope – af­ter hav­ing cul­ti­vated them with great ef­fort and even more pa­tience – and look­ing them in the face is ex­cit­ing, but a bit un­satisfying when they are cousins. Are they mav­er­icks or rather typ­i­cal for "Lo­kis"? Here are the por­traits of two more dis­tant re­la­tives, both also cousins: Mar­gulis­ar­chaeum pep­ti­dophila HC1 and Flexarchae­um multipro­tru­sionis SC1.

  • Fun­gal Stars in the For­est Dark

    by Elio — Fungi, along with se­lected bac­te­ria and in­ver­te­brates, are in­cluded in the list of bi­o­lu­mi­nes­cent or­gan­isms. These fungi are pretty unique be­cause, un­like the other light-emit­ting or­gan­isms, fungi don't walk, swim, or fly. Thus, the usual ex­pla­na­tions for bi­o­lu­mi­nes­cence...

  • A Happy Hot Cou­ple

    by Elio — We don't know about you, but we've be­come pretty blase about the stream of pa­pers, each with the cus­tom­ary two dozen or more au­thors, re­port­ing the com­pleted genome of yet an­other mi­crobe. But the re­cent one on the ar­chaeon Ig­nic­oc­cus hos­pi­talis mer­its spe­cial at­ten­tion.

  • Book Re­view: Find­ing the Mother Tree

    by Janie — Be­hind the scenes, un­der­ground, fun­gal net­works are es­sen­tial to the well­be­ing of forests. Trees sym­bi­ot­i­cally as­so­ciate with my­c­or­rhizal fungi, ex­chang­ing plant-pro­duced sug­ars for fun­gus-gath­ered soil nu­tri­ents and wa­ter. It's an in­ti­mate arrange­ment: the fun­gal cells thread be­tween...

  • The More the Mer­rier

    by Elio — Some­thing there is that likes to mull over sym­bioses. In­deed, what is more en­joy­able to con­tem­plate than the re­la­tion­ship be­tween two or­gan­isms? The an­swer? One that in­volves three, or four, or even more. Not that this is un­usual, just that it's al­ways ex­cit­ing. Here are two ex­am­ples.