The Mesel­son-Stahl Ex­per­i­ment

Pic­tures Con­sid­ered #17

by Elio

De­scribed as the "Most Beau­ti­ful Ex­per­i­ment In Bi­ol­ogy" (J. Cairns) the demon­stra­tion by Mesel­son and Stahl that DNA repli­cates semi­con­ser­v­a­tively is one of the ma­jor land­marks in the gen­e­sis of mod­ern bi­ol­ogy. And in­deed it is most pleas­ing, both vi­su­ally and cere­brally.

By semi­con­ser­v­a­tive is meant that each strand of a DNA mol­e­cule re­tains its in­tegrity dur­ing repli­ca­tion, an old "Wat­son strand" pair­ing with a newly made "Crick strand" and con­versely. Sim­ple as this may sound, the ex­per­i­ment re­quired the de­vel­op­ment of a method that would al­low to sep­a­rate "new" from "old" strands. What M&S did was to la­bel the DNA with N15 by grow­ing cul­tures in the pres­ence N15 am­mo­nium chlo­ride and then trans­fer­ring them to a medium with N14. This way, they la­beled the "old" strands with N15, the "new" ones with N14. They now sub­jected the DNA to ce­sium chlo­ride gra­di­ent cen­trifu­ga­tion.

This was a novel pro­ce­dure whereby the rel­a­tively heavy ce­sium chlo­ride "spins out" to­wards the bot­tom of the cen­trifuge cell. In time, this re­sults in a spon­ta­neously made den­sity gra­di­ent where mol­e­cules would find the layer cor­re­spond­ing to their own den­sity and ac­cu­mu­late at that po­si­tion as a band. New and old strands, as well as in­ter­me­di­ate ones, could now be vi­su­al­ized. The re­sult proved that DNA repli­ca­tion was in­deed semi­conser­vative. And in­deed, they did it with as­tound­ing sim­plic­ity and el­e­gance.

For fur­ther elab­o­ra­tion on this ex­per­i­ment, see an ar­ti­cle by T.H. Davis and one by P. C. Hanawalt.

 

Other Posts

  • When An­tibi­otic Re­sis­tance in vitro Does Not Tell You...

    ...What You Need To Know by Terry Roe­mer — In­creas­ingly, it is be­com­ing ap­par­ent that there is a deep dif­fer­ence be­tween what hap­pens in vivo and in vitro. The idea that one can com­fort­ably ex­trap­o­late from the bench to, say, the bed­side, is re­ced­ing rapidly. Liv­ing things, not even the small­est ones, are no agar plates, how­ever con­ve­nient and in­ex­pen­sive these may be.

  • Catch as Catch Can

    by Elio — The much ad­mired late ma­rine mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gist Ralph Lewin coined the term "ixotro­phy" to de­scribe how cer­tain bac­te­ria catch their prey by hav­ing a sticky sur­face. ('Iχo-' is de­rived from the Greek for "sticky" and 'iχos' means birdlime, the name of the gluey stuff used for trap­ping birds). Many read­ers, at least the older ones, will be re­minded of fly­pa­per.

  • Mi­cro­bial En­docrinol­ogy: A Com­ing of Age

    by Elio — If you stick around long enough, you rec­og­nize a rhythm in sci­ence as old mo­tifs resur­face every now and then, gain promi­nence for a while, and then fade away. In my mind, tan­ta­liz­ing ex­am­ples from the tides of Med­ical Mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy in­clude the elu­sive role of mi­crobes in chronic dis­eases, the in­di­ca­tions of...

  • Hedg­ing Your Bets

    by Merry Youle — Bac­te­ria that are born ge­net­i­cally equal aren't nec­es­sar­ily the same. The same genome, re­sid­ing in cells side-by-side in the same medium in the same flask, does not guar­an­tee the same phe­no­type. One ex­am­ple that comes to mind is the per­sis­ters in E. coli pop­u­la­tions − the small num­ber of cells that…

  • Putting Re­dun­dancy to Work

    by Ka­t­rina Nguyen — Ge­netic re­dun­dancy, when two genes en­code for the same func­tion, is wide­spread among many or­gan­isms. Re­dun­dant genes con­fer an ad­van­tage: if one gene is lost, its part­ner can sub­sti­tute and the phe­no­type of the or­gan­ism will not change. It is un­clear how re­dun­dancy is main­tained dur­ing evo­lu­tion since se­lec­tion against…

  • A Gath­er­ing of Com­ments on a Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion

    by Elio — First it may be ap­pro­pri­ate to re­peat what we mean by Tal­mu­dic Ques­tions (and there­fore Tal­mu­dic An­swers). We use the term loosely to de­note ques­tions that may lack de­fin­i­tive an­swers but that open the door to in­ge­nu­ity and di­alec­tic. These ques­tions em­body the mus­ings: "I have of­ten won­dered…