The Tale of a Tube­worm and a Biofilm

Note from the au­thors: This project would not have been pos­si­ble with­out the col­lab­o­ra­tive ef­fort of many peo­ple with a wide range of ex­per­tise; Spe­cial thanks to Michael Had­field for his ex­per­tise in tube­worm bi­ol­ogy and Mar­tin Pil­hofer for his elec­tron mi­croscopy work. We sin­cerely thank Dr. Shikuma for meet­ing with us per­son­ally to an­swer all ques­tions re­gard­ing the study.

by Jor­dan Kesner, Bryan Han­cock, and Nicole Nal­ban­dian

The oceans of our world har­bor an in­cred­i­ble di­ver­sity of life, the vast ma­jor­ity of which has yet to be ob­served or char­ac­ter­ized. This is part of what makes the study of ma­rine bi­ol­ogy so ex­cit­ing; there is, in essence, an end­less sea of new and ex­cit­ing un­der­wa­ter dis­cov­er­ies to be made. When a bi­ol­o­gist thinks of the crea­tures that in­habit our oceans, one of the promi­nent ex­am­ples that of­ten comes to mind is the tube­worm, a meta­zoan with a char­ac­ter­is­tic tube-like outer shell. The most likely im­age one thinks of is of the gi­ant chemosyn­thetic tube­worms in­hab­it­ing the dark­est re­cesses of the oceans near hy­drother­mal vents.

Fig­ure 1. Tube­worm Life Stages. Left, larva of H. ele­gans. Right, Adult H. el­e­gans with tube. Cour­tesy of Brian Nedved.

In fact, many dif­fer­ent species of tube­worms ex­ist in the var­i­ous re­gions of the ocean, and they are of­ten in­volved in com­plex sym­bi­otic re­la­tion­ships with other forms of ma­rine life. The elon­gated, cal­ci­fied, tube-like 'shell' in which adult worms live ac­tu­ally only rep­re­sents half of their life cy­cle. They also ex­ist in the ju­ve­nile state as free-swim­ming lar­vae, which ac­tively seek out new sur­faces to col­o­nize. When a tube­worm larva de­cides it has found a good spot to set­tle, it ini­ti­ates meta­mor­pho­sis that re­sults in an­chor­ing it­self to a solid sub­strate and be­gin grow­ing into an adult worm.  Af­ter the adult worms re­lease ga­metes into the wa­ter, they join to form new lar­vae, thus com­plet­ing the life cy­cle.

Bac­te­r­ial Prod­ding

Re­cently, bi­ol­o­gists have dis­cov­ered that bac­te­r­ial biofilms  are im­por­tant par­tic­i­pants in the life cy­cle of many ma­rine in­ver­te­brates. For in­ver­te­brates such as the tube­worm, Hy­droides el­e­gans (well known by sea­far­ing types for its role in bio­foul­ing), bac­te­r­ial biofilms are known to pro­duce a sig­nal re­quired by the lar­val stage of the worm to be­come able to set­tle and de­velop into a ma­ture, sta­tion­ary adult. When they re­ceive this sig­nal, the lar­vae of H. el­e­gans em­bed them­selves into the bac­te­r­ial biofilm.

Fig­ure 2. Colonies of P. lu­teo on agar. Cour­tesy of Nicholas Shikuma.

H. el­e­gans typ­i­cally lives in shal­low wa­ters in the so-called 'ben­thic zone', or low­est depth, where it shares an in­ter­est­ing re­la­tion­ship with a bac­terium, Pseudoal­teromonas lu­teovi­o­lacea (P. lu­teo). This is a biofilm-form­ing bac­terium that is re­spon­si­ble for in­duc­ing meta­mor­pho­sis in H. el­e­gans. Un­til re­cently, what this sig­nal was and how it func­tioned re­mained enig­matic.

Fig­ure 3.Figure 3. Struc­tural com­po­nents of as­sem­bled MACs. Cour­tesy of Ni­cholas Shikuma.

Here we ex­am­ine a re­cently pub­lished pa­per by Shikuma et al. that sheds light on this fas­ci­nat­ing bac­terium-tube­worm re­la­tion­ship. The au­thors took a close look at a clus­ter of genes found in P. lu­teo that had pre­vi­ously been iden­ti­fied as es­sen­tial to their abil­ity to in­duce meta­mor­pho­sis in the tube­worm.  They found that some of the se­quences re­sem­bled a fam­ily of bac­te­r­ial genes en­cod­ing the bioac­tive agents called bac­te­ri­ocins. Sur­pris­ingly, some bac­te­ri­ocins share mor­pho­log­i­cal and se­quence sim­i­lar­ity with the tail struc­tures of phages. Many phage use con­trac­tile tails to breach the cel­lu­lar en­velopes of their bac­te­r­ial hosts and gain ac­cess to the cy­to­plasm. The phage tail-like bac­te­ri­ocins have all the tail com­po­nents of a func­tional phage but with­out the DNA filled head of the virus, a most strik­ing ex­am­ple of evo­lu­tion lead­ing to mul­ti­ple uses of a bi­o­log­i­cal struc­ture.  And these struc­tures are also used for a kind of bac­te­r­ial pro­tein se­cre­tion called Type VI or in the vir­u­lence of the bac­terium Pho­torhab­dus against moths. But, re­mark­ably, phage tail-like struc­tures have yet other uses. This pa­per shows con­vinc­ingly that it is these struc­tures that pro­vide the sig­nal for a ben­e­fi­cial ac­tiv­ity, the ini­ti­a­tion of meta­mor­pho­sis in H. el­e­gans. The au­thors ap­pro­pri­ately name these pro­teins MACs, for Meta­mor­pho­sis-As­so­ci­ated Con­trac­tile Struc­tures.

Fig­ure 4. Mu­tant MACs do not in­duce meta­mor­pho­sis. Source

Sur­prises From Phage-like Tails

One of the most in­ter­est­ing as­pects of this study was the elu­ci­da­tion of the phys­i­cal struc­ture of the MAC pro­teins. The MACs of P. lu­teo are made of four ma­jor pro­teins: the base­plate, the sheath, and two tube pro­teins, each en­coded by a sep­a­rate ORF.  In vitro, MACs are re­leased ex­tra­cel­lu­larly when a small per­cent­age (ap­prox­i­mately 2.4%) of the P. lu­teo in a biofilm pop­u­la­tion lyse. To in­ves­ti­gate which com­po­nents of the MAC com­plex are re­quired for in­duc­tion of meta­mor­pho­sis, these re­searchers made mu­tants de­fi­cient in the MAC struc­tural genes. Each con­struct con­tained a base­plate-GFP fu­sion pro­tein to al­low vi­su­al­iza­tion of the re­leased MACs. Next, they pu­ri­fied the MACs and added them to H. el­e­gans. None of the mu­tant pro­teins were able to in­duce metamorphosis.This sug­gests that the full and in­tact MAC com­plex is re­quired in the H. el­e­gans life­cy­cle.

Fig­ure 5. Cryo-EM im­ages of MAC Su­per­struc­ture. Source

Us­ing cry­o­elec­tron mi­croscopy, the group ob­tained stun­ning im­ages of MACs in what is as­sumed to be a close rep­re­sen­ta­tion of their na­tive state. MACs do not func­tion in­di­vid­u­ally. Rather, they make highly or­dered ar­rays that are held in place in supramol­e­c­u­lar hexag­o­nal lat­tices. This is the first time such a com­plex struc­ture con­sist­ing of phage-like tails has ever been ob­served, and it may give in­sight into the na­tive struc­tures of re­lated bac­te­ri­ocins. The MAC tube pro­tein ap­pears to ex­ist in one of two con­for­ma­tions thought to rep­re­sent two dif­fer­ent func­tional states: one in which the tube pro­tein is still present in the MAC com­plex, and one in which it is miss­ing. Based on this and knowl­edge of how phages in­ject their DNA into host cells, one could spec­u­late that the MACs func­tion as a mol­e­c­u­lar gun, ir­re­versibly fir­ing the tube pro­tein into the cell mem­brane of the larva of H. el­e­gans.  The na­ture of the stim­u­lus that causes the MAC tube pro­tein to be fired from the com­plex is not yet known. The nov­elty of the data pro­duced by Shikuma et al. opens the door to many other ex­cit­ing ques­tions that the au­thors hope to an­swer in fu­ture stud­ies. Some of these al­ready come to mind: how ex­actly do MACs in­ter­act with the lar­vae, how is the tube fired from the com­plex, how many MACs are re­quired to in­duce meta­mor­pho­sis, what is the na­ture of the sym­bio­sis be­tween bac­te­ria and tube­worm, how is the syn­the­sis of the MACs reg­u­lated in the bac­te­ria, and so forth.

Novel Struc­tures, Novel Sig­nals

Pre­lim­i­nary data sug­gest that the hexag­o­nal lat­tice pro­tein that holds the MAC su­per­struc­ture in place (termed MAC‑L) is re­quired for lar­val meta­mor­pho­sis. This would seem to in­di­cate that the large, multi-MAC com­plexes pro­vide the sig­nal, and that in­di­vid­ual MAC com­plexes are not suf­fi­cient. The next step in this re­search will be to an­no­tate the bac­te­r­ial genome by knock­ing out spe­cific seg­ments of the genes as­so­ci­ated with the MAC pro­teins. Do­ing so will al­low iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of the key struc­tural com­po­nents re­quired for the func­tion of MACs. In his own words, Dr. Shikuma "would like to ex­plore the di­rect in­ter­ac­tions of P. lu­teo with H. el­e­gans to de­ter­mine pre­cisely how the MAC com­plex in­ter­acts with the lar­vae." He is also in­ter­ested in ex­plor­ing the phy­lo­ge­netic di­ver­sity of var­i­ous bac­te­r­ial species that syn­the­size MACs.

Fig­ure 6. The two states of the mol­e­c­u­lar gun, MAC Com­plex. Source

The pi­o­neer­ing work done here paves the way for more in­ten­sive study into MACs and specif­i­cally of their re­la­tion­ship to an­i­mal life cy­cles. Who knows, such a struc­tural bac­te­r­ial el­e­ment might carry out a ben­e­fi­cial func­tion in hu­mans. Wouldn't that be a novel and ex­cit­ing con­cept? It does not seem too far­fetched to think that MACs and phage tail-like struc­tures may be use­ful to hu­mans in the fu­ture. Maybe in agri­cul­ture, where MACs, in aid­ing cer­tain or­gan­isms to com­plete their life cy­cle, may lead to prop­a­ga­tion of new an­i­mal species in cap­tiv­ity and to other ben­e­fi­cial uses. Could MACs cre­ated in gut mi­crobes me­di­ate an im­mune re­sponse in the body? The fu­ture seems bright in MACland.

 

Ref­er­ences

Tran C, Had­field M (2011). Lar­vae of Pocil­lo­pora dam­i­cor­nis (An­tho­zoa) set­tle and meta­mor­phose in re­sponse to sur­face-biofilm bac­te­ria Ma­rine Ecol­ogy Progress Se­ries, 433, 85–96. DOI 10.3354/meps09192

Shikuma NJ, Pil­hofer M, Weiss GL, Had­field MG, Jensen GJ, New­man DK (2014). Ma­rine tube­worm meta­mor­pho­sis in­duced by ar­rays of bac­te­r­ial phage tail-like struc­tures. Sci­ence (New York, N.Y.), 343 (6170), 529–533. PMID 24407482

 

The au­thors of this pa­per are par­tic­i­pants in the 2014 Win­ter quar­ter UCSD/SDSU In­te­gra­tive Mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy grad­u­ate course. The au­thors con­tributed equally to this work.

 

Other Posts