Talmudic Question #102

Suppose you're a sessile marine creature looking to put down "roots" some place. Would you choose to attach to a living organism or to something dead or inanimate?

Suppose you're a sessile marine creature looking to put down "roots" some place. Would you choose to attach to a living organism or to something dead or inanimate?
by Merry — It has been dazzling, the insights into the evolutionary history and relationships of organisms gained in recent years through phylogenetic approaches. As the mountain of sequence data continues to grow exponentially and increasingly clever methods of analysis are devised, we can't help but wonder how far back in evolutionary history we might be able to see.
by Elio — Parlez-vous Biologie? In this spirit, we thought you might enjoy taking a quiz that tests your familiarity with terms of biology. To check your answer, you can get a definition of each of the terms by clicking on them. Many are from our column Of Terms in Biology, some from other posts…
Pictures Considered #53 by Christoph — ...for the most part. And it's vastly deeper than the diagram Roberto showed in his recent post "The Biological Pump." The euphotic and mesopelagic zone sizes are correct, but do not even approximately corelate with their vertical representation in the diagram. Why is this a point...
by Manuel Sanchez — Among Jules Verne's famous works is 'Journey to the Center of the Earth'. Have you read the book or seen one of the movie versions? If so, you will remember that when the fearless explorers descended into the depths of a volcano, they encountered prehistoric life forms such as plesiosaurs. It turns out that Verne wasn't far off. When we descend into the Earth's depths, we may...
Bacteria are prey to bacteriophages, other bacteria, protists, and fungi. Can you think of a mechanism that all these predators may have in common?
by Marcia Stone — Ribocytes, our 4‑billion year old RNA ancestors, were quintessentially microbial, quite different though than modern cells which eventually out-divided most of these little creatures and probably ate the rest. But while they were here ribocytes ruled the world—inventing both the genetic code and protein synthesis during their reign. The fact that…
By analogy to plants on land, I'll go with "dead and inanimate" but after reading _Small Things Considered_ for some years, I'm not sure that any marine niche is all that dead from the the Weltanschauung of a barnacle.
–bks
I would choose a sessile living organism and feed off its by-products.
Continuing with bks' comment, when I was working on the genome of the bacterium Hyphomonas netunium (which becomes sessile after attaching to a generally inorganic surface in order to spawn its motile "daughter cells"), I learned from the literature than oyster larvae preferably attach to a surface already colonized by Hyphomonas or related bacteria.
Elio replies:
Thanks for sharing this lovely vignette. Another fine example of the variety of microbial experiences.
I think it depends. A living organism is likely to have a consortium of established co-inhabitants. Therefore, unless I have a unique ability, I might be out-competed. However, a lifeless lump of rock is not very appealing — might be harder to "make a metabolic living" unless I can "eat" that rock and also grab what floats by.
Depends on what type of marine environment the organism is dealing with. In eutrophic environment with high nutrients attaching to a stationary element would work because nutrients are plentiful and simple diffusion will bring nutrients. In an oligotrophic environment attaching to a mobile element such as an animal would make more sense because the larger organism will move towards food which in turn brings the attached organism food.