Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion #102

Sup­pose you're a ses­sile ma­rine crea­ture look­ing to put down "roots" some place. Would you choose to at­tach to a liv­ing or­gan­ism or to some­thing dead or inan­i­mate?

 

Other Posts

  • Ear­li­est Ar­chae­ol­ogy

    by Merry — It has been daz­zling, the in­sights into the evo­lu­tion­ary his­tory and re­la­tion­ships of or­gan­isms gained in re­cent years through phy­lo­ge­netic ap­proaches. As the moun­tain of se­quence data con­tin­ues to grow ex­po­nen­tially and in­creas­ingly clever meth­ods of analy­sis are de­vised, we can't help but won­der how far back in evo­lu­tion­ary his­tory we might be able to see.

  • Pop Quiz

    by Elio — Par­lez-vous Bi­olo­gie? In this spirit, we thought you might en­joy tak­ing a quiz that tests your fa­mil­iar­ity with terms of bi­ol­ogy. To check your an­swer, you can get a de­f­i­n­i­tion of each of the terms by click­ing on them. Many are from our col­umn Of Terms in Bi­ol­ogy, some from other posts…

  • The ocean wa­ter col­umn is pro­foundly dark...

    Pic­tures Con­sid­ered #53 by Christoph — ...for the most part. And it's vastly deep­er than the dia­gram Ro­ber­to showed in his re­cent post "The Bio­lo­gi­cal Pump." The eu­photic and meso­pe­lagic zone sizes are cor­rect, but do not even ap­pro­xi­ma­te­ly co­re­late with their ver­ti­cal re­pre­sen­ta­tion in the dia­gram. Why is this a point...

  • In­trater­res­tri­als

    by Manuel Sanchez — Among Jules Verne's fa­mous works is 'Jour­ney to the Cen­ter of the Earth'. Have you read the book or seen one of the movie ver­sions? If so, you will re­mem­ber that when the fear­less ex­plor­ers de­scended into the depths of a vol­cano, they en­coun­tered pre­his­toric life forms such as ple­siosaurs. It turns out that Verne wasn't far off. When we de­scend into the Earth's depths, we may...

  • Oddly Mi­cro­bial: Ri­bo­cytes

    by Mar­cia Stone — Ri­bo­cytes, our 4‑billion year old RNA an­ces­tors, were quin­tes­sen­tially mi­cro­bial, quite dif­fer­ent though than mod­ern cells which even­tu­ally out-di­vided most of these lit­tle crea­tures and prob­a­bly ate the rest. But while they were here ri­bo­cytes ruled the world—inventing both the ge­netic code and pro­tein syn­the­sis dur­ing their reign. The fact that…

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
bks
12 years ago

By anal­ogy to plants on land, I'll go with "dead and inan­i­mate" but af­ter read­ing _Small Things Considered_ for some years, I'm not sure that any ma­rine niche is all that dead from the the Weltan­schau­ung of a bar­na­cle.
–bks

12 years ago

I would choose a ses­sile liv­ing or­gan­ism and feed off its by-prod­ucts.

12 years ago

Con­tin­u­ing with bks' com­ment, when I was work­ing on the genome of the bac­terium Hy­phomonas ne­tu­nium (which be­comes ses­sile af­ter at­tach­ing to a gen­er­ally in­or­ganic sur­face in or­der to spawn its motile "daugh­ter cells"), I learned from the lit­er­a­ture than oys­ter lar­vae prefer­ably at­tach to a sur­face al­ready col­o­nized by Hy­phomonas or re­lated bac­te­ria.
Elio replies:
Thanks for shar­ing this lovely vi­gnette. An­other fine ex­am­ple of the va­ri­ety of mi­cro­bial ex­pe­ri­ences.

12 years ago

I think it de­pends. A liv­ing or­gan­ism is likely to have a con­sor­tium of es­tab­lished co-in­hab­i­tants. There­fore, un­less I have a unique abil­ity, I might be out-com­peted. How­ever, a life­less lump of rock is not very ap­peal­ing — might be harder to "make a meta­bolic liv­ing" un­less I can "eat" that rock and also grab what floats by.

Marco
12 years ago

De­pends on what type of ma­rine en­vi­ron­ment the or­gan­ism is deal­ing with. In eu­trophic en­vi­ron­ment with high nu­tri­ents at­tach­ing to a sta­tion­ary el­e­ment would work be­cause nu­tri­ents are plen­ti­ful and sim­ple dif­fu­sion will bring nu­tri­ents. In an olig­otrophic en­vi­ron­ment at­tach­ing to a mo­bile el­e­ment such as an an­i­mal would make more sense be­cause the larger or­gan­ism will move to­wards food which in turn brings the at­tached or­gan­ism food.