Fine Read­ing: Houses Made by Pro­tists

by Elio

If there is a limit to what uni­cel­lu­lar or­gan­isms can do, you can't prove it by me. As Michael Hansell writes in an ar­ti­cle en­ti­tled Houses Made by Pro­tists, some sin­gle cells can make ex­ceed­ingly in­tri­cate struc­tures. Us­ing a Q&A for­mat, Hansell, who bears the in­ter­est­ing ti­tle of Pro­fes­sor of An­i­mal Ar­chi­tec­ture at the Uni­ver­sity of Glas­gow, dis­cusses ex­am­ples that defy the imag­i­na­tion.

Eu­g­lypha ro­tunda test show­ing some 120 ex­tremely reg­u­lar, over­lap­ping tiles that, prior to cell di­vi­sion, be­come arranged around the newly bud­ding or­gan­ism. A fur­ther 8 to 14 slightly thicker, toothed tiles sur­round the aper­ture. Source

Take for in­stance the pyra­mids of Egypt. They are made of huge lime­stone blocks of fos­sil shells of an­cient foraminifera (forams). These are true gi­ants among the pro­tists, mak­ing shells that reach 10 cm across. That's some amoeba! (The an­cient Greeks thought they were pet­ri­fied lentils. That's some lentils!) A lovely ac­count of this gi­gan­tism can be seen in a site called Pyra­mids, forams, and Red Sea reefs: Field notes from Lor­raine Casazza. Foraminifera are not the only ones to make houses; the so-called tes­tate amoe­bas do, too. ("Tes­tate" refers to tests, the name of such shells. A con­fus­ing term, that. Try giv­ing a test about pro­tist tests.)

A shell of Dif­flu­gia corona, a tes­tate amoeba. Source

These pro­tist ar­chi­tects have two con­struc­tion meth­ods at their dis­posal. One is for the or­gan­isms to in­gest par­ti­cles of sand, or in some cases to make in­sol­u­ble pro­tein struc­tures, and then spit them out to form the shell. Sev­eral hun­dred such grains may be re­quired for mak­ing one shell. This isn't all. The shells of Dif­flu­gia corona have a de­fined aper­ture, in some cases sur­rounded by a num­ber of "teeth" (in it­self a story for an­other day). The other method is to ap­pro­pri­ate pre­formed par­ti­cles and as­sem­ble them, much like a ma­son would make a wall with bricks. These may be struc­tures de­rived from other or­gan­isms, such as plates from the shells of mi­croal­gae or the spicules of sponges. Re­gard­less of the tech­nique used, the struc­tures of each species tend to have a dis­tinc­tive size and shape. For in­stance, cer­tain forams make mul­ti­cham­bered shells that re­sem­ble cham­bered Nau­tilus shells in minia­ture. How do they do it? It's likely that pseudopods come in handy in the con­struc­tion.

Fos­sil case of a trocham­minid foram con­structed from al­gal coc­col­iths (re­pro­duced with per­mis­sion of Erik Thom­sen). Source

Some of these house builders are enor­mously so­phis­ti­cated. Take the ex­tinct foram shown in the mi­cro­graph. Its shell con­sists of plates from the shell of a coc­col­ithophore alga. These pho­to­syn­the­siz­ers are ex­tremely abun­dant in the oceans to­day and were prob­a­bly avail­able in the early cre­ta­ceous. Here is the amaz­ing part: not only do these cells know how to col­lect the algae's plates and to arrange them in a geo­met­ric pat­tern, but they even trim their edges so that they are no longer cir­cu­lar but be­come hexag­o­nal, a shape that al­lows them to be packed in a closed geom­e­try. Just like ma­sons chip­ping away at bricks to make them fit bet­ter.

Houses? What's next?

 

Ref­er­ence

Hansell M (2011). Houses made by pro­tists. Cur­rent Bi­ol­ogy, 21 (13). DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.050

 

Other Posts

  • An An­cient Fun­gus On A Fun­gus On A Fun­gus

    by Elio — Some­times the ti­tle says it all. Ev­i­dence of my­co­par­a­sitism and hy­per­my­co­par­a­sitism in Early Cre­ta­ceous am­ber tells you: (a) that the au­thors are talk­ing about some­thing that took place some 100 mil­lion years ago, and (b) that there are sev­eral lay­ers of par­a­sitism in the spec­i­men in ques­tion. So, what is this spec­i­men...

  • Virus? ...sim­ply a piece of bad news wrapped up in pro­tein.

    by Christoph — In the mid­dle of the first ma­jor pan­demic of my life­time I feel the need, as a mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gist, to make oc­ca­sional con­tri­bu­tions that may help in­di­vid­u­als and so­ci­ety ap­proach the pan­demic in a rea­son­ably in­formed way. To­day, I'd like to con­tribute with a small dose of 'mi­cro­bial lit­er­acy,' as called for by Ken Tim­mis and col­leagues...

  • Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion #13

    Ni­tro­gen-fix­ing bac­te­ria in the root nod­ules of legumes dif­fer­en­ti­ate into bac­teroids, ter­mi­nal cells in­ca­pable of re­pro­duc­tion. The nod­ules con­tain a few dor­mant bac­te­r­ial cells that can pro­lif­er­ate upon re­lease from the plant...

  • Heavy-duty Traf­fic, Mi­croscale

    by Christoph — Men­tion "fla­gel­la" and we mi­cro­bio­lo­gists in­stant­ly think of these in­gen­ious ap­pe­nda­ges that bac­te­ri­al cells use to pro­pel them­selves through flu­ids of va­ry­ing vis­co­si­ties (ar­chaea do this, too, with their ar­cha­el­la). We ra­re­ly think of them as an ac­ces­sory to trans­port car­go. Yes "car­go," you read cor­rect­ly, but may­be you re­mem­ber...

  • Let Them Eat Mush­rooms

    by Elio — Peo­ple who ven­ture into forests in search of mush­rooms have in­sects to con­tend with. I don't mean mos­qui­toes, wasps, and bees. I mean bugs that en­joy eat­ing mush­rooms at least as much as some of us do. Mush­room hunt­ing is a chancy en­ter­prise at best. But as if that weren't enough, some­times we come upon...

  • A Pathogen's Swiss Army Knife

    by Maren von Köck­ritz-Blick­wede — Staphy­lo­coc­cus au­reus is an amaz­ingly im­pres­sive bug that end­lessly fas­ci­nates and wor­ries mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gists. It has an ex­cep­tional abil­ity to ex­ploit host im­mune func­tions, thereby caus­ing a wide range of life­­­–threatening in­fec­tions. For more than 40 years, new dis­cov­er­ies about its vir­u­lence po­ten­tial have been made at a steadily in­creas­ing pace.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Nathan Myers
14 years ago

What's next? Cell­phones. Haha, sorry, I meant to say nan­otech. Oops. OK, air pol­lu­tion. Done, too? Beer. Oh yes, how em­bar­rass­ing. Pol­i­tics? Ponzi schemes? Record com­pa­nies?

Amanda Sheakoski
14 years ago

I had to find an ar­ti­cle to write about for school, and I found this to be com­pletely fas­ci­nat­ing! I en­joyed read­ing it very much 🙂