A Mi­crobe By Any Other Name Would Smell As Sweet…

by Mark O. Mar­tin

It has long been known that the sense of smell can evoke the rich­est mem­o­ries. Oliver Wen­dell Holmes wrote: Mem­o­ries, imag­i­na­tion, old sen­ti­ments, and as­so­ci­a­tions are more read­ily reached through the sense of smell than through any other chan­nel. How does this re­late to mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy? One of the most com­mon com­plaints from stu­dents new to a mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy lab is that "bac­te­ria smell bad." (I usu­ally re­mind them to in­clude the ar­chaea in their eu­kary­ocen­tric judg­men­tal­ism.) But odors—sweet or not—are due to volatile chem­i­cals and can be a form of in­for­ma­tion, re­veal­ing meta­bolic char­ac­ter­is­tics and con­vey­ing sub­tle sig­nals be­tween dif­fer­ent or­gan­isms.

Source

Pseudomonas aerug­i­nosa can fa­mously gen­er­ate a 'grape juice' smell in in­fected burn pa­tients. Anaer­obes are par­tic­u­larly pun­gent due to their re­liance on sulfhydryl com­pounds to main­tain re­dox bal­ance. (Closer to home, Gram neg­a­tive anaer­obes are of­ten re­spon­si­ble for 'morn­ing breath'. Many of the pleas­ant aro­mas of fer­mented foods can be traced to the pro­duc­tion of volatile mol­e­cules by mi­cro­bial ac­tion. Cer­tain cyanobac­te­ria and actin­o­mycetes syn­the­size geosmin, a volatile chem­i­cal that is rem­i­nis­cent of pot­ting soil. (Nor­man Pace has been known to wax lyri­cal here, call­ing geosmin "the breath of the mi­cro­bial world.") Even the dis­tinc­tive aroma of the seashore is due in large part to mi­cro­bial ac­tiv­ity. In fact, the trea­sured ocean fra­grance is due to none other than di­methyl sul­fide, an odor oth­er­wise as­so­ci­ated with hu­man di­ges­tion. In my own ex­pe­ri­ence, I once found a con­t­a­m­i­nant dur­ing a course I was teaching—a flat, yel­low colony grow­ing on stan­dard nu­tri­ent agar—that smelled very much like a spe­cific brand of tor­tilla chips. Which sug­gests the ques­tion of why tor­tilla chips smell like, well, tor­tilla chips. Some ques­tions are bet­ter left un­ex­am­ined.

Geosmin. Source

The pos­si­bil­ity of mi­cro­bially-me­di­ated ol­fac­tory com­mu­ni­ca­tion may go still far­ther. It's in­trigu­ing that re­cent ev­i­dence points to an­i­mal-as­so­ci­ated mi­cro­bial com­mu­ni­ties pro­duc­ing odor­ants that al­low dif­fer­ent kin groups of hye­nas to rec­og­nize one an­other in the wild.

Volatiles stream­ing from a 'hot' com­post pile. Source

There was even an ASM ses­sion at the Gen­eral Meet­ing in Philadel­phia two years ago, chaired by Mel Rosen­berg, on the sub­ject of odors and mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy. Top­ics ranged from the role of spe­cific mi­cro­biota in pro­duc­ing bad breath, to sub­du­ing the gen­er­a­tion of methane in the hu­man gas­troin­testi­nal tract via pre­bi­otics, to re­duc­ing the ol­fac­tory im­pact of swine sewage ponds. But I sus­pect that the is­sue of odor is more sub­tle and wide­spread (and mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cally in­ter­est­ing) than a sim­ple in­ven­tory of those un­pleas­ant to us, and the ses­sion at­ten­dees clearly agreed with that sen­ti­ment. I would re­mind the reader of Ju­lian Davies' con­cept of the 'par­vome', the uni­verse of small mol­e­cules that act as sig­nals be­tween mi­crobes. Why not volatile chem­i­cals, uti­liz­ing a mi­cro­bial equiv­a­lent of ol­fac­tion? Could prokary­otes have a sense of, well, smell? Surely they do, as wit­nessed by their abil­ity to rec­og­nize volatile sig­nals. There is some ev­i­dence for such sig­nal­ing be­tween mi­crobes and plant roots in the soil and for its in­volv­ment in colony for­ma­tion among some mi­crobes.

Davies re­minded me re­cently that the great Joshua Leder­berg once wrote that bac­te­ria were com­mu­ni­cat­ing all the time; we sim­ply didn't know the fre­quency! Maybe the 'fre­quen­cies' are chem­i­cal, the mes­sages volatile and aro­matic, and we are but 'deaf' eaves­drop­pers hold­ing our metaphor­i­cal noses in a world much richer and more in­for­ma­tion-packed than we might ex­pect.

 

Mark O. Martin

Mark is as­so­ciate pro­fes­sor in the De­part­ment of Bi­ol­ogy, Uni­ver­sity of Puget Sound, an As­so­ciate Blog­ger for STC, and a pas­sion­ate ad­vo­cate for the Small Things.

 

Other Posts

11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
15 years ago

I can speak to the is­sue of "hot" com­post piles!
Nicely done, MoM!
–Nancy H.

Suzanne Winter
15 years ago

Awe­some ar­ti­cle! I spend my days work­ing with wine and food, and cheese in par­tic­u­lar, and am con­stantly grasp­ing for some mi­cro­bial ra­tio­nal­iza­tions for ol­fac­tory de­scrip­tions that of­ten seem more pre­ten­tious than any­thing else. If you have any fur­ther read­ing sug­ges­tions, I'd love to have them!

15 years ago

Dr. Davie's lab is mov­ing in next to ours — I hope his work doesn't fo­cus too much on the smelly and odor­ous side of mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy!

Lisa Gorski
15 years ago

I still use smell to iden­tify bac­te­ria. I was taught by my grad school ad­vi­sor, Ed Lead­bet­ter, of the im­por­tance of the nose in iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. He was leg­endary in his skill. We used to joke that he had a nose like a gas chro­mato­graph! Nice post!

Julian Davies
15 years ago

Well done Mark M.!
Jean-Marc Ghigo and col­leagues (In­sti­tute Pas­teur) have just just pub­lished a pa­per show­ing that bac­te­ria can com­mu­ni­cate by us­ing am­mo­nia gas:
Bernier, S. ; Létoffé, S. ; Delepierre, M and Ghigo J.M.. (2011) Bio­genic am­mo­nia mod­i­fies an­tibi­otic re­sis­tance at a dis­tance in phys­i­cally sep­a­rated bac­te­ria. Mol­e­c­u­lar Mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy in press..
For a French bug, this does not seem like a very at­trac­tive or ex­cit­ing choice; Chanel #5, where are you?

VIVEK
15 years ago

FABULOUS ARTICLE...

Eduardo Leiderman
15 years ago

What a beau­ti­ful pre­sen­ta­tion of some­thing that we all should know but ig­nore.

Andrew C.
15 years ago

I once grew Vib­rio for­tis on chitin and it pro­duced a slightly sweet smell that most peo­ple said re­sem­bled Downy dryer sheets.

15 years ago

Thanks for all the nice com­ments! I thought that this post might at­tract some at­ten­tion...
1. Suzanne, I am chas­ing down a pa­per or two for you; I'll post it when I find it. I loved your com­ment about "prenten­tious" ter­mi­nol­ogy!
2. Mike, Ju­lian Davies is a fan­tas­tic and fas­ci­nat­ing per­son. You'll love chat­ting with him. And most acti­nobac­te­ria smell like soil (well, like geosmin), so you will be all set.
3. Lisa, me too. Ed Lead­bet­ter has a great en­rich­ment pro­to­col for a bac­terium that smells like but­ter­scotch. THAT I have to have in my pro­to­col book.
4. Ju­lian, I tip my hat re­spect­fully. Lit­er­ally.
5. An­drew, I will never look at drier sheets the same way—and is the odor­ant a sig­nal?!
6. Vivek and Ed­uardo, thank you 10^6 for the kind words. We all need to ob­serve our mi­cro­bial friends...and some­times, the best ap­pa­ra­tus can be our own senses!

Lynnette Claire
15 years ago

Fas­ci­nat­ing! I al­ways get the Sen­si­tive Nose Award at home. How I have some idea of what it is I'm re­ally smelling.
Great de­scrip­tions.

j.a. kaan
13 years ago

Bac­te­ri­ol­o­gists love to smell their cul­tures. There is one fa­mous dan­ger­ous genus though and that is Bru­cella: no spe­cific smell, but a good chance to get in­fected with a po­ten­tially lethal bac­ter­aemia. Bru­cel­losis is known for its po­ten­tial of oc­cu­pa­tional lab­o­ra­tory in­fec­tion. Bru­cella is a gram-neg­a­tive bac­terium which can be iso­lated from blood cul­tures or abcesses. It grows on blood and choco­late agar as small white colonies. Don't ever sniff from such colonies which you ex­pect to be Haemophilus or an­other gram­neg­a­tive.