Vi­ral Tur­tles

by Merry Youle

A dou­ble stranded RNA (dsRNA) vi­ral genome, in­tro­duced into a host cell, is met by for­mi­da­ble host de­fenses. The very pres­ence of dsRNA in a eu­kary­otic or prokary­otic cell an­nounces a vi­ral in­fec­tion and elic­its ef­fec­tive re­sponses, rang­ing from si­lenc­ing of the vi­ral mR­NAs to apop­to­sis. De­spite that, there are suc­cess­ful dsRNA viruses through­out the bios­phere. By 2000, eight fam­i­lies with close to 200 "species" were known to in­fect bac­te­ria, fungi, plants, and an­i­mals. The broad di­ver­sity of their hosts notwith­stand­ing, all dsRNA viruses share the same se­cret to suc­cess: they bring their cap­sid into the cell along with their genome to serve as a safe com­part­ment where they tran­scribe and repli­cate their genome. Their dsRNA is never ex­posed.

Source

For the virus whose virion is but a sim­ple pro­tein cap­sid, it is the en­tire virion that en­ters and per­sists in­tra­cel­lu­larly. For oth­ers that have ad­di­tional outer lay­ers of pro­tein and/or a mem­brane, those lay­ers are re­moved dur­ing cell en­try and the in­ner cap­sid alone en­ters the cy­to­plasm. The outer lay­ers vary greatly from group to group, pre­sum­ably re­flect­ing adap­ta­tions to par­tic­u­lar hosts or modes of trans­mis­sion, while the pro­teins of the in­ner cap­sid, as well as its ar­chi­tec­ture, are highly con­served among all dsRNA viruses. Doesn't this sug­gest a com­mon an­ces­try?

This strat­egy poses par­tic­u­lar chal­lenges, not the least of which is how do you trans­port some­thing as large as a virion across the cell mem­brane. Also, since a dsRNA genome is not a suit­able tem­plate for pro­tein trans­la­tion or for cel­lu­lar repli­cases, these viruses have to bring their own RNA-de­pen­dent RNA poly­merase (RdRp) with them. The cap­sid it­self has to be se­lec­tively porous, al­low­ing nu­cleotides to en­ter and RNA tran­scripts to exit.

Model of a tran­scrip­tion­ally ac­tive L‑A virion. The RdRp (Pol) is on the in­ner sur­face of the cap­sid, bound to a Gag pro­tein and thus im­mo­bi­lized. Dur­ing tran­scrip­tion, the dsRNA genome moves se­quen­tially past the RdRp and the tran­scripts are im­me­di­ately ex­truded through the largest holes in the cap­sid. Source

Pic­ture a cap­sid con­tain­ing both a dsRNA genome and an RdRp that has ar­rived in the cy­to­plasm of a sus­cep­ti­ble host. Its first job is to tran­scribe its dsRNA genome in­side the cap­sid to yield genome-length pos­i­tive sense tran­scripts that are im­me­di­ately ex­truded through holes in the cap­sid. The tran­scripts serve two func­tions, the first be­ing as mR­NAs for the syn­the­sis of vi­ral pro­teins. Sec­ondly, as the cap­sid pro­teins ac­cu­mu­late and self-as­sem­ble in the cy­to­plasm, some of the ss­RNA tran­scripts are en­cap­si­dated to be­come the ge­nomic RNA. The fi­nal step takes place in­side the newly-as­sem­bled viri­ons when the ss­RNA is used as the tem­plate for syn­the­sis of the neg­a­tive sense strand by the RdRp in virio. This el­e­gant and ef­fi­cient repli­ca­tion scheme is shared by all known dsRNA viruses.

Quite a feat, re­ally, tran­scrib­ing a pack­aged RNA genome in such con­fined quar­ters. And for viruses with seg­mented genomes, such as the blue­tongue virus (fam­ily Re­oviri­dae), the task is even more daunt­ing. They must si­mul­ta­ne­ously and repet­i­tively tran­scribe 19 kb of dsRNA di­vided among ten dif­fer­ent mol­e­cules in­side an 80 nm cap­sid. More­over, this virus also methy­lates and caps each mRNA be­fore ex­tru­sion.

A sim­pler, well-stud­ied ex­am­ple is the LA virus (fam­ily To­tiviri­dae) found in most strains of yeast. Its non-seg­mented genome is a mere 4.6 kb and con­tains only two over­lap­ping genes. One of them en­codes the ma­jor cap­sid pro­tein, Gag, while the other en­codes the RdRp. The RdRp is syn­the­sized as a Gag fu­sion pro­tein, i.e. as a Gag pro­tein co­va­lently joined to an RdRp tail. The 40 nm cap­sid is built from 120 Gag pro­tein mol­e­cules, two of which have RdRp tails and are lo­cated at five-fold ver­tices. Ex­am­i­na­tion of the cap­sid struc­ture by X‑ray crys­tal­log­ra­phy at 3.4 ? res­o­lu­tion re­vealed that the RdRp tail faces the in­te­rior of the cap­sid. The tran­scrip­tase, be­ing firmly at­tached to the cap­sid struc­ture, is sta­tion­ary while the RNA — ap­prox­i­mately 1.3 µm long for even this small genome — is translo­cated past it. The newly-syn­the­sized strand is ex­truded through 15 ? di­am­e­ter holes that are large enough for ss­RNA but too small to pass ei­ther dsRNA or cel­lu­lar en­zymes.

Cell fu­sion dur­ing mat­ing in yeasts. Source (link dead in 2023)

(We can't re­sist men­tion­ing that a blue­tongue virus cap­sid con­tains not two but ten copies of the RdRp, one to process each genome seg­ment. Here, too, the RdRps are lo­cated at the five-fold ver­tices. Since there are but 12 such ver­tices per cap­sid, this ap­pears to limit dsRNA viruses to a max­i­mum of 12 genome seg­ments.)

An­other LA virus trick: Un­like some other dsRNA viruses, they do not cap their ex­truded mR­NAs, thus leav­ing them, one would sup­pose, vul­ner­a­ble to degra­da­tion by the cell. In­stead they play a num­bers game. The Gag pro­teins pro­vide an en­zy­mat­i­cally ac­tive site on the outer cap­sid sur­face that re­moves the caps from host mR­NAs, thus flood­ing the cell's mRNA degra­da­tion sys­tem with de­capped cel­lu­lar mR­NAs. This lets enough of their own mR­NAs es­cape de­struc­tion.

Lastly, LA viruses take the usual dsRNA de­fen­sive strat­egy one step far­ther. Not only does their dsRNA genome never leave the cap­sid, but their cap­sids never exit the cell! These non-in­fec­tious "viruses" ex­ploit the promis­cu­ous mat­ing habits of their S. cere­visiae hosts and move from cell to cell via the cy­to­plas­mic mix­ing that ac­com­pa­nies mat­ing. This virus-host re­la­tion­ship is sta­ble and seem­ingly co­pacetic; the viruses do not al­ter their host's phe­no­type or rate of growth, but rely on some host fac­tors for their own repli­ca­tion.

If you're the kind of per­son who wants bi­o­log­i­cal en­ti­ties to ad­here to an in­vi­o­late set of defin­ing rules, I sup­pose you could ar­gue that the LA virus isn't a real virus. But if you are that kind of per­son, many viruses are bound to give you a headache.

 

Ref­er­ences

Mertens, P. (2004). The dsRNA viruses Virus Re­search, 101 (1), 3−13. DOI 10.1016/j.virusres.2003.12.002

Castón JR, Trus BL, Booy FP, Wick­ner RB, Wall JS, Steven AC. (1997). Struc­ture of L‑A virus: a spe­cial­ized com­part­ment for the tran­scrip­tion and repli­ca­tion of dou­ble-stranded RNA. The Jour­nal of cell bi­ol­ogy, 138 (5), 975−985. PMID 9281577

 

Other Posts

  • The "Mi­crobe Hunters" by Paul DeKruif

    A Ma­jor Force in Mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal His­tory by Elio — The chances are good that when you ask a se­nior mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gist how he or she got into this sci­ence, they will tell you that they were in­flu­enced as teenagers by read­ing "Mi­crobe Hunters." I was about 14 years old when I did, and I be­came trans­fixed by the glo­ri­ous and...

  • A Short­ened Tail

    Pic­tures Con­sid­ered #8 by Elio — Elec­tron mi­croscopy of phages came into promi­nence in the 1950's and re­vealed many of their phys­i­cal at­trib­utes such as their par­tic­u­late na­ture, mor­pho­log­i­cal com­plex­ity, "tail first" at­tach­ment to host cells, etc. Among these dis­cov­er­ies was that T‑even col­iphages con­tract their tail upon ab­sorp­tion to their E. coli hosts. A 1967 pa­per…

  • Teach­ers Cor­ner: Who bears the load?

    by Roberto — First, let me com­ment on the ti­tle I wrote. It should have read, what bears the load? Bet­ter yet, what part of the bac­te­r­ial cell en­ve­lope is the load-bear­ing com­po­nent? When­ever I taught bac­te­r­ial cell bi­ol­ogy I al­ways started by de­scrib­ing the com­po­nents of cell en­ve­lope, cy­to­plas­mic mem­brane, cell wall and, in the Gram-neg­a­tives, the outer mem­brane.

  • Phage Phac­to­ries

    by Merry — t's not news to STC read­ers that phages en­code cy­toskele­tal pro­teins. Daniel Haeusser's fine post re­lated this story as it was known in 2012. Two key pa­pers pub­lished that year in­ves­ti­gated the tubu­lin ho­mologs found in phage genomes. At that time, phage-en­coded tubu­lin ho­mologs fell into two phy­lo­ge­netic clus­ters...

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
16 years ago

so, is this a virus that doesn't lose its cor­po­real in­tegrity?
http://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2007/01/talmudic_questi_1.html
Merry replies: Didn't take you long to zero in on that!!!
The best an­swer I can pro­vide here is to agree that a ma­ture virion does not lose its cor­po­real in­tegrity upon in­fec­tion of a host. How­ever, there is no con­ti­nu­ity of that "cor­po­real in­tegrity" from one gen­er­a­tion to the next. The prog­eny are as­sem­bled from newly syn­the­sized RNAs and pro­teins. Any­time we want to draw a sharp line sep­a­rat­ing one bi­o­log­i­cal cat­e­gory from an­other, some ex­cep­tion comes along....

Nathan Myers
16 years ago

What a tal­ent you (or maybe viruses) have for mak­ing my head ex­plode with every para­graph!
Are these still rec­og­niz­able as ge­netic rel­a­tives of other viruses?
Merry replies:
Your ques­tion raises a ma­jor point that plagues vi­rol­o­gists. Ex­cept for very closely re­lated viruses, their lin­eages have di­verged for such a long pe­riod of time that there is typ­i­cally no rec­og­niz­able sim­i­lar­ity in their ge­nomic se­quences. The amino acid se­quences of the most highly con­served pro­teins (virion struc­tural pro­teins and the genome pack­ag­ing ma­chin­ery) show a bit more sim­i­lar­ity, but even here one can't de­tect any re­lat­ed­ness for the vast ma­jor­ity of viruses. There is yet one more strat­egy be­ing used, that be­ing to look at the pro­tein "folds," the com­plex 3D struc­tures of these pro­teins. Here re­searchers have found ev­i­dence that vi­ral lin­eages in­clude viruses that in­fect hosts in all three do­mains. Thus these lin­eages are thought to be an­cient, >3 bil­lion years old, hav­ing orig­i­nated be­fore the bac­te­r­ial, ar­chaeal, and eu­kary­otic do­mains di­verged.
Back to your ques­tion: I'd be will­ing to bet that these "tur­tles" ei­ther have been or will be demon­strated to be sim­i­lar to other viruses.