Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion #56

The ge­nie has re­turned. (He first vis­ited here) Dur­ing a moon­lit walk on the beach, you stub your toe against a bot­tle, which rolls against a rock and shat­ters. A ge­nie is lib­er­ated, ea­ger to grant you one wish. You ask for a mi­crobiological lab­o­ra­tory fully equipped to your specifi­ca­tions. The ge­nie grants you that but with the con­di­tion that you can study only one or­gan­ism. Which would you choose?

 

Other Posts

7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
16 years ago

Well, if the djinn has su­per­nat­ural abil­i­ties (the full funded mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal lab is a good sign of this), I would ar­gue that the one or­gan­ism I would study would be the LUCA.
But you know how those deal with djinni go.

16 years ago

One ORGANISM? Well, in that case, I'd have to pick the ge­nie. How cool would it be to have the first peer-re­viewed pa­per on the gut mi­cro­biota of a su­per­nat­ural be­ing?
(Dou­bly use­ful if it turns out that some of the mi­crobes also have su­per­nat­ural pow­ers and can, for ex­am­ple, grant my wish to have all the junkmail that piles up in my mail­box bro­ken down and fer­mented to bu­tanol for my car. I'd be ec­sta­tic about that, even if I had to let some other lab do the de­tailed re­search on it.)
Elio says:
Your sense of hu­mor and your mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal savvy are a lethal com­bi­na­tion!

Abe Eisenstark
16 years ago

Sal­mo­nella ty­phimurium. Sec­ond choice might be an Er­winia that in­fects an in­sect that de­stroys olives [three part sym­bio­sis]. The Er­winia can­not be grown out­side of the olive, so far. But maybe I would choose an ex­tremophile.
Abe Eisen­stark

16 years ago

Sporosarcina ureae, I en­joy the sim­plic­ity of the en­dospore for­ma­tion. In the rod shaped bac­te­ria the mother cell/developing en­dospore struc­tural re­la­tion­ship makes some sense and is well stud­ied. I am fas­ci­nated by the for­ma­tion of an en­dospore in­side the strict geo­met­ric con­fines of a coc­cus form... I'll ad­mit a per­sonal in­ter­est more than a pro­found one.
Elio replies:
I am hooked and will read more about this bug. Be­sides, what could be more pro­found than a per­sonal in­ter­est?

Welkin
16 years ago

No ques­tion, it would be bdel­loid ro­tifers! Not only are they ex­tremely in­ter­est­ing, "hon­orary" mi­crobes (see Small Things Con­sid­ered April 20, 2009 "The Scan­dalous Bdel­loid Ro­tifers"), their genomes have two retroele­ments that look for all the world like retro­viruses (Vesta and Juno), so I could ex­ploit a loop­hole in the Genie's con­di­tion — three or­gan­isms for the price of one!

Angel J. Rivera
16 years ago

Well!! I can think of many in­di­vid­ual and very im­por­tant bac­te­ria to choose. But this fan­tas­tic op­por­tu­nity does not come around of­ten. SO!! Let us think out­side the box and adopt a wise-guy at­ti­tude on this one. Af­ter all if we have to do it for grants, we mind as well do it in this sit­u­a­tion. The ge­nie never spec­i­fied the de­f­i­n­i­tion of or­gan­ism. So we can con­sider a mi­cro­biota (a com­mu­nity of bac­te­r­ial cells) a func­tional or­gan­ism. Af­ter all many of us eu­kary­otes are a com­mu­nity of cells and we are con­sid­ered an or­gan­ism. So let us re­search away mi­cro­bio­tas and get a plethora of mi­croor­gan­isms stud­ied in the process. Now, the trick here is de­cid­ing which mi­cro­biota to pick.

Elena
16 years ago

Burk­holde­ria cepa­cia com­plex (Bcc)