Small­est Things Con­sid­ered

by Merry

What do stunted co­conut palms, mis­shapen potato tu­bers, and peach trees with necrotic branches have in com­mon? They are three of the nu­mer­ous crops stricken with dis­eases caused by vi­roids, an as­ton­ish­ing group of min­i­mal­ist plant pathogens. There isn't much to a vi­roid, just one sin­gle-stranded, cir­cu­lar RNA mol­e­cule. The lar­gest vi­roid genome so far is 399 nu­cleotides, the small­est a mere 246 – about one tenth the size of the small­est vi­ruses (he­pad­navirus) and one hun­dredth the size of more typ­i­cal viruses. Be­ing la­beled as "sub­vi­ral," they are even less likely than the viruses to be granted a place on the tree of life. They get by with­out cap­sid or mem­brane shell. They en­code no pro­teins. They don't re­verse-tran­scribe in­to DNA when they repli­cate. They never in­sert into the host genome. Some of them cause dis­ease symp­toms, some don't. They sim­ply repli­cate in­side plant cells and then their prog­eny move on to the next lo­ca­tion to re­peat the process. Their very ex­is­tence raises quest­ions, many with­out an­swers.

Leaflets of oil palm in­fected with cadang-ca­­dang-like vi­roid and show­ing symp­toms of or­ange spot­ting. Source

What does a vi­roid look like? Well, that de­pends on the vi­roid. The thirty-plus species known so far fall into two groups. Most be­long to the Pospivi­roidae (PSTVd), named af­ter the Potato Spin­dle Tuber ViroiD. Four species, in­clud­ing the Avo­cado SunBlotch ViroiD, make up their own group, the Avsunvi­roi­dae (AS­BVd). Al­though all of them lack pro­tec­tive cap­sids, they are nev­er­the­less highly struc­tured.

Most of their RNA genome base-pairs with com­ple­men­tary se­quences in other parts of the same RNA mol­e­cule to form sec­tions of dou­ble-he­lix. The PSTVds form rod-shaped struc­tures, the AS­B­Vds have more elab­o­rate forms. (See fig­ure.) For both groups, the bulges and loops are im­portant for sur­vival, repli­ca­tion, and traf­fick­ing. (For a re­cent re­view, click here.)

Pre­dicted low­est free en­ergy sec­ondary struc­tures of (a) the po­tato spin­dle tu­ber vi­roid, a Pospi­vi­roidae, and (b) peach la­tent mo­saic vi­roid, an Av­sun­vi­roidae. Source

How do they repli­cate when they en­code no pro­teins? Vi­roids rely on host cell fac­tors to help with just about every­thing. Once the vi­roid RNA en­ters a cell, it re­cruits fac­tors for "RNA traf­fick­ing" to the com­part­ment where it repli­cates; that's the nu­cleus for the PSTVds, the chloro­plast for the AS­B­Vds. Then, for copy­ing their RNA, both groups co-opt host DNA-de­pen­dent RNA poly­merases, redi­rect­ing them to use the vi­roid RNA as tem­plate. This works, but is er­ror-prone, giv­ing one of the vi­roids the fastest known rate of mu­ta­tion.

Both types repli­cate us­ing a rolling cir­cle mech­a­nism. Al­though the de­tails dif­fer, they both pro­duce long, mul­ti­meric strands of RNA that must be cut into monomers, each monomer then li­gated to form an in­di­vid­ual cir­cu­lar vi­roid. For the cut­ting AS­B­Vds em­ploy a do-it-your­self strat­egy. They ded­i­cate 40 nu­cleotides of their se­quence to form the small­est known nat­u­rally-oc­cur­ring ri­bozyme. This ham­mer­head ri­bozyme cat­alyzes the self-cleav­age needed to trans­form the long mul­ti­meric strands into in­di­vid­ual genomes. Af­ter repli­ca­tion, the prog­eny RNAs use host fac­tors to help them move to neigh­bor­ing cells through the con­nect­ing plas­mod­es­mata or to dis­tant parts of the plant via the phloem.

Vi­roids un­der the elec­tron mi­cro­scope. Source

Next ques­tion. How do they cause dis­ease if they don't en­code any pro­teins? Di­rectly, by RNA in­ter­fer­ence. RNAi is a mech­a­nism that de­grades dou­ble-stranded RNAs (dsRNA). In plants, this de­fends against RNA viruses by at­tack­ing their dou­ble-stranded repli­ca­tion intermedi­ates. Not only does this strat­egy not work against vi­roids, but it ac­tu­ally causes the symp­toms as­so­ci­ated with vi­roid in­fec­tion. How does this hap­pen? Short lengths of RNA clipped from the vi­roid genome can base pair with com­ple­men­tary host mRNA to form dsR­NAs that are then de­graded. De­stroy­ing the mR­NAs ef­fec­tively turns off the cor­re­spond­ing genes in the host. You might won­der why host-de­rived RNAi doesn't de­grade the dou­ble-stranded vi­roids. This is likely due to the viroid's com­plex sec­ondary struc­ture and to the fact that all of their dou­ble-stranded re­gions are too short to ac­ti­vate RNAi.

Where did vi­roids come from? Vi­roids show no re­la­tion­ship to viruses, but there is some ev­i­dence – all seem­ingly a bit of a stretch – sug­gest­ing evo­lu­tion­ary links to trans­pos­able el­e­ments, or may­be to mi­to­chon­dr­ial plas­mids, or even to self-splic­ing in­trons. Take your pick. All vi­roids form a mono­phyletic group along with the satel­lite RNAs also found in plants. Are they an­cient? Those who pic­ture early life on the planet as based on RNA, not DNA, would like to think so.

If vi­roids are an­cient, or even just a cen­tury old, why the sud­den ap­pear­ance of vi­roid dis­eases in our crops in re­cent decades? At least some vi­roids were ac­ci­den­tally in­tro­duced by hu­mans from wild rel­a­tives where of­ten their in­fec­tions are asymp­to­matic. We be­come aware of them in our crops when they cause dis­ease. Once in­tro­duced, we have in­sured that they spread. They used to have to rely pri­mar­ily on di­rect trans­mis­sion to the next gen­er­a­tion via seed or pollen. Some were oc­ca­sion­ally car­ried from one host to the next by chew­ing in­sects. Nowa­days, our prac­tice of mono-crop­ping makes in­ad­ver­tent trans­mis­sion by in­sects far more likely. Bet­ter yet, most of­ten we trans­port the vi­roids our­selves, in­tro­duc­ing them di­rectly into their next host as we prune or graft.

Why are there no vi­roids that in­fect an­i­mals? Maybe even bac­te­ria? Not a clue.

An­cient or not, vi­roids are to­day ex­pand­ing their hori­zons through global com­merce, meet­ing new hosts through mod­ern agri­cul­ture. Life is good for vi­roids to­day – if in­deed it would oc­cur to any­one to de­scribe vi­roids as alive.

 

Ref­er­ence

Ding B (2009). The bi­ol­ogy of vi­roid-host in­ter­ac­tions. An­nual Re­view of Phy­topathol­ogy, 47, 105–131. PMID 19400635

 

Other Posts

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Nathan Myers
17 years ago

This is the most amaz­ing bit of bio-news I've en­coun­tered all year. I place these along­side pri­ons as some­how more ac­ci­den­tal and less pur­pose­ful than other struc­tures that ap­pear in liv­ing things. Does that make me a bad evo­lu­tion­ist?
At­tack­ing chloro­plasts seems a clue; we should be look­ing for these things in­fect­ing free-liv­ing de­scen­dants of the prokary­otic prog­en­i­tor of chloro­plasts. As with viruses, "in­fec­tion" can mean some­thing very dif­fer­ent for a ge­net­i­cally uni­form pop­u­la­tion of sin­gle-celled or­gan­isms than for one of us. I can­not quite bring my­self, though, to sug­gest that it might, like virus-like struc­tures, have ac­tu­ally been use­ful to them.

17 years ago

I'd al­ways as­sumed that vi­roids couldn't in­fect an­i­mals be­cause an­i­mals don't have plas­mod­es­mata-con­nected cells al­low­ing easy trans­mis­sion. Mind you, now I think about it I sup­pose that if vi­roids de­vel­oped from host DNA af­ter the evo­lu­tion of plants that could also be an ex­pla­na­tion.
Merry adds:
So many pos­si­bil­i­ties! Play­ing the spec­u­la­tive game with you, it might be that the vi­ral de­fense mech­a­nisms of an­i­mal cells might be bet­ter able to rec­og­nize and de­stroy vi­roids.
Or, if all vi­roids repli­cated in chloro­plasts, then one could imag­ine that the vi­roids could co-opt only the chloro­plast-as­so­ci­ated DNA-de­pen­dent RNA poly­merase for its own repli­ca­tion. But there are vi­roids that repli­cate just fine in the nu­cleus. Cross that one off the list.
Or, in ad­di­tion to ver­ti­cal in­her­i­tance, plants pro­vide the pos­si­bil­ity of hor­i­zon­tal trans­mis­sion via in­sect vec­tors. An­i­mals aren't so ac­com­mo­dat­ing.
Or....

qetzal
17 years ago

How hard have we looked for vi­roids in an­i­mals? How were they first de­tected in plants, and has any­one ap­plied sim­i­lar tech­niques to an­i­mals?
Merry replies:
Qet­zal, you do ask good ques­tions! I don't have many an­swers here. I can com­ment that vi­roids were dis­cov­ered in plants be­cause they caused dis­ease in some val­ued crops. When re­searchers tried to track down the virus re­spon­si­ble, they found it was not a virus but these truly bizarre things now called vi­roids. This per­sonal per­spec­tive by the dis­cov­erer, Theodor Di­ener, might be of in­ter­est.
Time­line: Dis­cov­er­ing vi­roids — a per­sonal per­spec­tive
Theodor O. Di­ener
http://www.nature.com/nrmicro/journal/v1/n1/full/nrmicro736.html
Na­ture Re­views Mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy 1, 75–80 (Oc­to­ber 2003)

qetzal
17 years ago

First, a great big "Thank you" to Merry for the Di­ener ret­ro­spec­tive. Very in­ter­est­ing!
Sec­ond, in case any­one else is in­ter­ested, Di­ener ex­plains that vi­roids were iso­lated based on in­fec­tiv­ity — ba­si­cally test­ing dif­fer­ent sam­ples for their abil­ity to in­fect a host plant (e.g. af­ter treat­ment with DNase, RNase, or pro­tease, tak­ing dif­fer­ent frac­tions from den­sity cen­trifu­ga­tion, etc.).
Third, upon fur­ther read­ing I learned that there is one vi­roid-like repli­con known in an­i­mals — he­pati­tis delta virus. It's a sin­gle-stranded RNA satel­lite virus of He­pati­tis B virus. Like vi­roids, its RNA genome is mostly self-com­ple­men­tary, form­ing a rod-like struc­ture. Also like vi­roids, it repli­cates by a rolling-cir­cle mech­a­nism, and uses an in­her­ent ri­bozyme ac­tiv­ity to cleave off the monomers.
Un­like vi­roids, HDV has a large genome (1.7kb) that in­cludes a sin­gle pro­tein-cod­ing gene. HDV co-opts the HepB sur­face anti­gen to form its cap­sid.
There's an in­ter­est­ing open-ac­cess re­view here (MMC Lai 2005, J Vi­rol 79:7958–7958).
Merry replies:
And thank you, Qet­zal, for shar­ing your finds. As to the HDV, it is an­other ex­am­ple of where the "crit­ters" refuse to be as­signed to neat, non-over­lap­ping (one could also add "mono­phyletic") cat­e­gories.

HeyHey
13 years ago

Well done Nathan with your, "we should be look­ing for these things in­fect­ing free-liv­ing de­scen­dants of the prokary­otic prog­en­i­tor of chloro­plasts." I look for­ward to see­ing the re­sults of someone's in­ves­ti­ga­tions into this.