The Se­cret Un­der the Ice

Trans­lated by per­mis­sion from his ar­ti­cle posted April 17, 2009, on his blog Cu­riosi­dades de la Mi­cro­bi­ología.

by Manuel Sánchez

There is an old sci­ence fic­tion story called Who Goes There that was twice made into a movie. It dealt with a sci­en­tific ex­pe­di­tion to the North Pole which, un­der the ice, found an ex­trater­res­trial space­ship car­ry­ing alien forms of life. Well, now a real sci­en­tific ex­pe­di­tion to the Antarc­tic found a com­plete ecosys­tem that was trapped un­der ice some 1.5 mil­lion years ago. The or­gan­isms of this ecosys­tem are of earthly ori­gin, but they may open up the pos­si­bil­ity that life ex­ists on other plan­ets.

Shot from the '51 movie The Thing from An­other World. Source

In the Antarc­tic, there is a site called Blood Falls, near the end of the Tay­lor Glac­ier, near the Mc­Murdo Dry Val­leys. This for­ma­tion comes from a deep sub­glacial lake about 400 m be­neath the ice at its high­est point. The strik­ing color is due to the wa­ter emerg­ing from the lake be­ing en­riched for fer­rous iron, which be­comes rapidly ox­i­dized to the in­sol­u­ble bright red fer­ric ion. The sub­glacial lake is part of a sys­tem of fjords that be­came trapped when the Tay­lor Glac­ier was formed some two mil­lion years ago.

Blood Falls. In the left cor­ner, see a cam­p­ing tent. Credit: P. Re­jcek, NSF. Source

Ge­omi­cro­bi­ol­o­gist Jill Mikucki and col­leagues stud­ied a num­ber of sam­ples col­lected over a pe­riod of six years and found that they con­tained 17 types of mi­crobes. The re­sults are pub­lished in Sci­ence, with a com­men­tary. Ge­nomic analy­sis re­vealed that these or­gan­isms are re­lated to sul­fate-re­duc­ing bac­te­ria (SRB) that ox­i­dize the scarce or­ganic ma­te­r­ial in the wa­ter, re­duc­ing sul­fate in the process.

Cu­ri­ously, these don't use sul­fate di­rectly in res­pi­ra­tion like their SRB cousins, nor do they con­vert it all the way to sul­fide. In­stead, these mi­crobes re­duce the in­sol­u­ble fer­ric ion to the sol­u­ble fer­rous ion, which is then ox­i­dized by con­tact with the air. Sul­fate here ap­pears to be used as a cat­a­lyst, its re­duced form be­com­ing re­ox­i­dized by cou­pling to the fer­ric to fer­rous (Fe3+ → Fe2+) re­ac­tion. These mi­crobes ap­pear to con­sti­tute a con­sor­tium that "breathes" fer­ric ions.

Phy­lo­ge­netic tree of se­quences of the dissimi­latory adeno­sine 5'-phospho­sul­fate–reductase in mi­crobes from the Blood Falls. Most are re­lated to the genus Desul­fo­capsa. Some (group 2) have a closer re­la­tion­ship to Thermodesul­fovi­brio. Source

The wa­ter of the sub­glacial lake con­tains no dis­solved oxy­gen and has a pH of 6.2. Its tem­per­a­ture is −5º C, but the wa­ter does not freeze be­cause its salt con­cen­tra­tion is four times that of sea­wa­ter. The con­cen­tra­tion of mi­crobes is about 10,000 per ml. Their gen­er­a­tion time was es­ti­mated to be 300 days; thus, there have been around one mil­lion gen­er­a­tions since the lake be­came en­cased in ice.

This find­ing helps ex­plain how life might sur­vive the cold pe­ri­ods pro­posed by the "Snow­ball Earth" the­ory, dur­ing which the planet is pos­tu­lated to have been en­tirely cov­ered by ice. More­over, this mi­cro­bial strat­egy prompts spec­u­la­tion about life ex­ist­ing in such in­hos­pitable and cold places as Mars or Jupiter's moon Eu­ropa – the dream of every exo­bi­ol­o­gist.

For a com­men­tary in Na­ture, click here.

 

Scheme for how the sub­glacial mi­crobiota ox­i­dize or­ganic com­pounds us­ing sul­fate as an elec­tron ac­cep­tor. Re­duced sul­fur is re­ox­i­dized by re­duc­tion of fer­ric to fer­rous ions. Fer­rous is sol­u­ble and is ox­i­dized to fer­ric when in con­tact with oxy­gen, be­com­ing in­sol­u­ble and form­ing red­dish pre­cip­i­tates. Source

 

Other Posts

  • A Sym­biont Be­trays Its Host

    by Elio — It came as a sur­prise to me re­cently to re­al­ize how much is known about the im­mune re­sponses of plants and, more­over, how much there is to know. There is, I found, de­tailed mol­e­c­u­lar in­for­ma­tion about how our botan­i­cal cousins de­fend them­selves against the on­slaught of in­fec­tious agents. Per­haps most…

  • Nature's Drug Fac­to­ries: Vi­su­al­is­ing the In­vis­i­ble

    by Munro Pass­more — For ge­ne­ral au­dien­ces, sci­ence can of­ten seem im­pe­ne­trab­le to un­der­stand be­cause of its in­her­ent scale and com­plex­ity. This is par­ti­cu­lar­ly true in the field of na­tur­al pro­ducts – where we seek to un­der­stand the pro­ces­ses mi­cros­cop­ic or­gan­isms un­der­take to make mo­le­cules we la­ter use as...

  • Bac­te­ria of a Feather…

    by Elio — Just when we thought we'd heard it all, along came a study on the bac­te­r­ial degra­da­tion of bird feath­ers. We ad­mit we hadn't pre­vi­ously spent much time con­tem­plat­ing the pos­si­bil­ity that feath­ers would be sus­cep­ti­ble to bac­te­r­ial degra­da­tion, just like any other ker­atin-con­tain­ing struc­ture. But to a bird...

  • Round­ing up the Honey Bees (1)

    by Christoph — Why would I de­vi­ate here from STC's habit to rather not fea­ture the newest re­sults of trendy re­search top­ics? The rea­son comes hid­den in a short no­tice in Sci­ence by War­ren Cornwall:"...The new re­search is cer­tain to make a con­tro­ver­sial her­bi­cide even more of a flash­point." He re­ferred, of course, to a re­cent pa­per pub­lished in PNAS...

  • Dr. Rous's Prize-Win­ning Chicken

    by Welkin John­son — One hun­dred years ago this month, Pey­ton Rous pub­lished the first in a se­ries of pa­pers de­scrib­ing ex­per­i­ments that be­gan with work on a sar­coma from a sin­gle Ply­mouth Rock hen. In that ini­tial pa­per, Rous showed that bits of the tu­mor could es­tab­lish new tu­mors when...

  • A Happy Hot Cou­ple

    by Elio — We don't know about you, but we've be­come pretty blase about the stream of pa­pers, each with the cus­tom­ary two dozen or more au­thors, re­port­ing the com­pleted genome of yet an­other mi­crobe. But the re­cent one on the ar­chaeon Ig­nic­oc­cus hos­pi­talis mer­its spe­cial at­ten­tion.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Laloy E
17 years ago

Very in­ter­est­ing. What about Ar­chaea un­der the ice ?
Com­ment by Elio
I wish I knew. Let me know if you ever found out

qetzal
17 years ago

Very cool stuff!
How does 10,000/mL com­pare to other nat­ural aque­ous en­vi­ron­ments? I'm guess­ing that's a pretty high den­sity, but I don't re­ally know much about nat­ural mi­cro­bial abun­dance.
Of course, I imag­ine slow turnover and min­i­mal pre­da­tion help to boost the mi­cro­bial den­sity.
Thanks, qet­zal. Ac­tu­ally, 10,000/mL is low, though surely not in­signif­i­cant. Typ­i­cally ocean sur­face wa­ters host a mil­lion mi­crobes per mL (and ten times as many phage).
Merry

Terry Gulliver
17 years ago

Chapelle, 2001 2nd Ed Ground­wa­ter mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy & geochem, Wi­ley, has it that "it has re­cently been shown that much H2S pro­duced un­der anaer­o­bic con­di­tions is also re­ox­i­dized anaer­o­bi­cally. Anaer­o­bic ox­i­da­tion of sul­fide ap­pears to be cou­pled to re­duc­tion of Fe(III) present in the sed­i­ments and thio­sul­fate, a par­tially ox­i­dized in­ter­me­di­ate com­pound, is pro­duced. Thio­sul­fate is then dis­pro­por­tion­ated to ei­ther sul­fate or sul­fide."
In 2002 we showed sul­fate re­duc­tion of tert-butyl al­co­hol (TBA) in a shal­low ground­wa­ter plume, with TBA C‑13 and sul­fate S34 frac­tion­at­ing along the path. In the TBA source area, the very low con­cen­tra­tions of sul­fate had very scat­tered S34, sug­gest­ing re­cy­cling of S and Fe ox­ides on sand grains. No de­tectable Fe or sul­fide solutes in the plume. The sand was orig­i­nally aer­o­bic; about 10 years af­ter the ma­jor spills, this sul­fate re­duc­ing regime de­vel­oped, and the plume re­treated like a glac­ier over five years and all but van­ished, the ground­wa­ter re­turn­ing to aer­o­bic. We had no ev­i­dence of aer­o­bic degra­da­tion of the very pure TBA in early days & it is com­monly claimed this does not oc­cur. We were not al­lowed by the owner to carry the study too much fur­ther into "sci­ence project" realm. But I am end­lessly fas­ci­nated by mi­crobes' turn­ing up with the right tool­box in pe­cu­liar cir­cum­stances, given, like a plumber, time to get around to it.
Elio's re­sponse.
Fas­ci­nat­ing! It shows how com­plex and var­ied mi­cro­bial ac­tiv­i­ties can be! Thanks for shar­ing this.