Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion #48

Can you think of an ex­am­ple of an in­tact pro­tein mo­lecule be­ing taken up by a free-liv­ing bac­terium?

 

We jumped the gun and de­parted from the usual for­mat by send­ing this ques­tion in ad­vance to a few peo­ple. This net­ted us some in­trigu­ing thoughts from Jon Beck­with, Win­fried Boos, Ian, Booth, and An­drew Wright, plus notes from a few oth­ers who told us they couldn't come up with much. Now it's your turn. Please don't be de­terred from adding your ideas and com­ments.

Here's what we have so far:

  • Bac­te­ri­ocins. Many are small pep­tides, but some are as big as 20 kDa, so at least these qua­lify as re­spectable pro­teins. And they cer­tainly pen­e­trate, or else they wouldn't work on such tar­gets as DNA, rRNA, and tRNA. The up­take mech­a­nism is known in some cases to in­volve porins.
  • Phage pro­teins. DNA phages in­ject so-called "pi­lot pro­teins" needed for the translo­ca­tion of their DNA. In the clas­sic Her­shey-Chase ex­per­i­ment, a small pro­por­tion of the 35S‑labeled pro­teins of the orig­i­nal phage was as­so­ci­ated with the bac­te­ria af­ter in­fec­tion. This didn't bother Her­shey and Chase but later turned out to be of in­ter­est. How­ever, does "in­jec­tion" by a phage count?
  • Periplas­mic pro­teins such as Mal­tose Bind­ing Pro­tein can pen­e­trate into the periplasm when added in so­lu­tion to E.coli cells per­me­abi­lized with cal­cium. But they are not known to en­ter the cy­to­plasm, so this doesn't count, does it?
  • Other. An­drew Wright wrote:"An­other "ar­ti­fi­cial sys­tem" is REMI (re­stric­tion en­zyme medi­ated in­ser­tion) where re­stric­tion en­zymes are in­tro­duced into cells (yeast and Dic­tys­telium) by elec­tro­po­ra­tion. I don't know if this works with bac­te­ria but my guess is that it should. Of course elec­tro­po­ra­tion cu­vettes are not float­ing around in the en­vi­ron­ment but other con­ditions in na­ture ei­ther now or in the dis­tant past might have mim­ic­ked this. I imag­ine many types of pro­teins could be in­tro­duced in the same way – if at­tached to DNA or some other macro­mol­e­cule."

Why would we want to know? This qual­i­fies as an­other Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion it­self. But not to pro­long mat­ters, here are some of our an­swers:

  1. Or­ganelles, such as mi­to­chon­dria and chloro­plasts, take up pro­teins that are en­coded by the nu­clear genome and syn­the­sized on ri­bo­somes in the cy­to­plasm. When and how did they ac­quire this skill? Should we ad­dress the ques­tion to their an­ces­tral rel­a­tives, the rick­ettsiae and the cyanobac­te­ria? And how about bac­te­r­ial en­dosym­bionts?
  2. Could pro­teins in­volved in DNA repair/mutagenesis when taken up from the en­vi­ron­ment play a role in bac­te­r­ial evo­lu­tion?
  3. Could sol­u­ble pro­teins be taken up to act as sig­nal­ing agents be­tween species?

 

Other Posts

  • The Dy­namo at Work

    Pic­tures Con­sid­ered #15 by Christoph — Why on earth would one stare – even for a few sec­onds – at a blurry, low-res, pix­e­lated movie, watch­ing a jit­tery rod tum­bling coun­ter­clock­wise around its pivot? Be­cause it's ATP syn­thase, a key en­zyme of the en­ergy me­tab­o­lism in every liv­ing cell, that's ro­tat­ing there. And when...

  • Raft­ing Through Time

    by Elio — In the placid old days, cell mem­branes were as­sumed to be fairly sim­ple af­fairs: lipid bi­lay­ers with some pro­teins float­ing in them like corks. This "fluid mo­saic" arrange­ment took a beat­ing around the 1970's, when bio­physi­cists sug­gested that mem­branes may be com­posed of mi­crodomains, where cer­tain lipids and pro­teins be­come...

  • Bac­te­r­ial Phys­i­ol­ogy and Vir­u­lence: The Cul­tures Con­verge

    by Fred Nei­d­hardt — Growth dom­i­nates the at­ten­tion of many bac­te­ri­ol­o­gists. It has done so for over a cen­tury, in­spir­ing ex­plo­rations into the com­plex bio­chem­istry and phys­i­ol­ogy that pro­duce new cells able to grow, sur­vive harsh en­vi­ron­ments, and live to grow an­other day.

  • Phys­i­cal Vi­rol­ogy

    by Manuel Sánchez — 'Phys­i­cal Vi­rol­ogy.' Such is the ti­tle of the ar­ti­cle that ap­peared in 'Na­ture Physics'. This is the name for a new dis­ci­pline that is un­der de­vel­op­ment. Its fo­cus is the study of viruses from a phys­i­cal per­spec­tive. Seen this way, viruses are nat­ural nanopar­ti­cles...

  • Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion #154

    My­c­or­rhizal fungi are known to carry out many ac­tiv­i­ties ben­e­fi­cial to plants, such as trans­port­ing wa­ter and nu­tri­ents, pro­tect­ing against pathogens, and per­mit­ting com­mu­ni­ca­tion be­tween plants. Do they also carry pathogens such as viruses or bac­te­ria? If no, why not?

  • Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion #56

    The ge­nie has re­turned. Dur­ing a moon­lit walk on the beach, you stub your toe against a bot­tle, which rolls against a rock and shat­ters. A ge­nie is lib­er­ated, ea­ger to grant you one wish. You ask for a mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal lab­o­ra­tory fully equipped to your spec­i­fi­ca­tions. The ge­nie grants you that but with the con­di­tion that you can study only one or­gan­ism. Which would you choose?

8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
David R Zusman, University of California at Berkeley
17 years ago

Myx­o­coc­cus xan­thus ap­pears to as­sim­i­late some pro­teins from its neighbors/environment as ev­i­denced by the res­cue of some mu­tants by wild­type. Per­haps the best doc­u­mented ex­am­ple of this is the out­stand­ing pa­per by Nudle­man, Wall, and Kaiser in Sci­ence. 2005 Jul 1;309(5731):125–7."Cell-to-cell trans­fer of bac­te­r­ial outer mem­brane lipopro­teins." The ab­stract for this pa­per is be­low:
Myx­o­coc­cus xan­thus cells can glide for­ward by re­tract­ing type IV pili. Tgl, an outer mem­brane lipopro­tein, is nec­es­sary to as­sem­ble pili. Tgl mu­tants can be tran­siently "stim­u­lated" if brought into end-to-end con­tact with tgl+ donor cells. By sep­a­rat­ing the stim­u­lated re­cip­i­ent cells from donor cells, we found that Tgl pro­tein was trans­ferred from the donors to the res­cued re­cip­i­ent cells. Mu­tants lack­ing CglB lipopro­tein, which is part of a sec­ond glid­ing en­gine, could also be stim­u­lated, and CglB pro­tein was trans­ferred from donor to re­cip­i­ent cells. The high trans­fer ef­fi­ciency of Tgl and CglB pro­teins sug­gests that donor and re­cip­i­ent cells briefly fuse their outer mem­branes.
COMMENT ON COMMENT:
David, this is amaz­ing. We, and surely our read­ers, are grate­ful to you for point­ing this out. The re­main­ing ques­tion is: "how unique is this?"
Elio

Ryan F
17 years ago

Isn't trans­port into or­ganelles anal­o­gous to trans­port out of bac­te­ria? The pro­tein is moved from the cy­to­plasm into the in­tramem­brane space and then into the or­ganelle. If so this would count ei­ther since it isn't the ac­qui­si­tion of whole pro­tein im­port but the equiv­a­lent of pro­tein ex­port it just hap­pens to be go­ing into an or­ganelle.
COMMENT ON COMMENT:
It de­pends whose cy­to­plasm you con­sider. Get­ting a pro­tein into an or­ganelle is to in­tro­duce it into its "cy­to­plasm." So, it's still go­ing in the in­ward di­rec­tion.
But this re­minds me that we should also won­der why bac­te­ria, be­ing good at se­cret­ing pro­teins, have for­got­ten how to do it the other way, if they ever knew.
What does Bob B. have to say about this?
Elio

17 years ago

Elio, Mil­ton Saier once wrote a pa­per dis­cussing the pos­si­bil­ity of Bdellovib­rio "forc­ing" the op­er­a­tion of se­cre­tion ma­chin­ery back­wards dur­ing pre­da­tion. I don't know if he has fol­lowed up on those ideas:
Saier MH Jr. (1994). "Pro­tein up­take into E. coli dur­ing Bdellovib­rio in­fec­tion. A process of re­verse se­cre­tion?" FEBS Lett. 337: 14–7
Ab­stract: Bdellovib­rio bac­te­ri­ovorus is a small bac­te­r­ial par­a­site that in­fects other Gram-neg­a­tive bac­te­ria, re­sides in the periplasm of the host cell, and uti­lizes host macro­mol­e­cules as a source of nu­tri­ents. Ev­i­dence is sum­ma­rized sug­gest­ing that B. bac­te­ri­ovorus se­cretes pro­teases and nu­cle­ases syn­the­sized in its own cy­to­plasm that are tar­geted to the cy­to­plasm of the host cell. Pos­si­ble mech­a­nisms for this trans-trimem­brane pro­tein trans­port process are dis­cussed.

Peter Weigele
17 years ago

Dear Elio,
In some ex­per­i­ments per­formed by Bryant and King (1984), it was shown that P22 can in­ject a func­tional pro­tein into the cy­to­plasm of the host. In the ex­per­i­ments, phage par­ti­cles lack­ing the in­jec­tion pro­tein could be res­cued by coin­fec­tion with repli­ca­tion de­fec­tive phage that oth­er­wise con­tained a nor­mal com­ple­ment of in­jec­tion pro­tein. Other ex­am­ples in phage abound. Many phage con­tain pro­tein co­va­lently at­tached to their DNA ter­mini and are es­sen­tial for repli­ca­tion; phi29 be­ing one such ex­am­ple. The phage N4 in­jects a DNA de­pen­dent RNA poly­merase dur­ing its in­fec­tion. This is all the more amaz­ing be­cause the size of the pro­tein in the virion par­ti­cle is big­ger than the tail tube down which it must travel to get into the cy­to­plasm.
Of course these are all ex­am­ples of pro­teins be­ing "put there" by viruses, so maybe they don't count as pro­tein mol­e­cules be­ing "taken up" by free liv­ing cells: the cells are pas­sive re­cip­i­ents and per­haps not ac­tive con­sumers, as it were. Surely it is only a mat­ter of time be­fore ex­am­ples of the lat­ter are char­ac­ter­ized...
‑her­mes

Daniel Smith
17 years ago

Tal­mu­dic ques­tion 48 is quite in­ter­est­ing and has me on quite the read­ing kick re­gard­ing en­dosym­bionts, mi­to­chon­dria, plas­tids, and other or­ganelles. Per­haps 'will­ing up­take' (to sep­a­rate from ei­ther lab­o­ra­tory in­tro­duc­tion or toxic events such as bac­te­ri­ocins,
phage pro­teins, and bdellovib­rio pre­da­tion) of free pro­teins by free bac­te­ria is very rare and hasn't evolved. One would ex­pect de­vel­op­ment of such up­take sys­tems pri­mar­ily in sit­u­a­tions where bac­te­ria are in­ter­act­ing with other or­gan­ism in ei­ther a sym­bi­otic in­ter­ac­tions (en­dosym­bio­sis, con­sor­tia, and biofilms) or in predation/pathogenesis. Oth­er­wise, dif­fu­sion and the rel­a­tively low num­ber of se­creted pro­teins would make it un­likely the bac­te­ria would en­counter alien pro­teins to up­take.
For the evo­lu­tion of an up­take sys­tem the bac­te­ria would need a con­stant and suf­fi­cient source of spe­cific pro­teins. Also the pro­teins taken in would likely need to give some
func­tional ad­van­tage (miss­ing me­tab­o­lism) be­yond mere car­bon, ni­tro­gen, and sul­fur sources. Many bac­te­ria leave be­hind huge amounts of bio­mass when they leave a biofilm.
But such makes me won­der what hap­pens in long cul­ture con­di­tions where biofilm pro­duc­tion is a ne­ces­sity. In these cases the bac­te­ria go through cy­cles of growth, senes­cence, and ly­sis. Per­haps the lat­ter growth phases re­quires up­take of pro­teins in ad­di­tion to pep­tides.
COMMENT ON COMMENTS:
I found your no­tions par­tic­u­larly as­tute. Think­ing of the eco­log­i­cal im­per­a­tives, es­pe­cially biofilms, seems like the right way to fo­cus on such ques­tions.
Thanks,
Elio

Daniel Smith
17 years ago

Oh I for­got...
What about pilus re­trac­tion?

Daniel Smith
16 years ago

Just found this in­ter­est­ing ar­ti­cle. Ap­par­ently yeast mi­to­chon­dr­ial tar­get­ing se­quences can be im­ported into Para­coc­cus den­i­tri­f­i­cans and re­quired a mem­brane po­ten­tial.
Im­port of a mi­to­chon­dr­ial pre­se­quence into P den­i­tri­f­i­cans: In­sight into the evo­lu­tion of pro­tein trans­port
David Roise and Mer­ritt Maduke in FEBS Let­ters 337 (1994) 9–13

Daniel Smith
15 years ago

Re­cently, pointed out to me by a lab­mate:
En­do­cy­to­sis of Gem­mata ob­scuriglobus, a bac­te­ria in the phy­lum Planc­to­mycetes
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/29/12883
Good point. A story that will un­fold fur­ther, one would think.
Elio