What You Didn't Know About Jan­thi­nobac­terium

by Jenna Ta­bor-God­win, Rhona Stu­art, Rosa I. León Za­yas, and Chi­tra Ra­jaku­beran*

Some bugs are ex­cit­ing but it takes them a while to be­come well known. The rod-shaped, Gram-neg­a­tive Jan­thinobacterium lividum falls in this cat­e­gory. But re­cent dis­cov­er­ies about its phys­i­ol­ogy, ecol­ogy, and med­i­cine high­light its im­por­tance. J. lividum is com­monly found in soil and bod­ies of wa­ter, but can also turn up in spoiled milk and, on rare oc­ca­sions, can cause sep­ticemia in hu­mans. Lest you think that its name hon­ors some­one called Jan­thin, jan­thi­nus is Latin for vi­o­let-col­ored. (It used to be called Chro­mobac­terium.) It is aer­o­bic and can be cul­tured. Colonies are pur­plish-black due to its wa­ter-in­sol­u­ble pig­ment called vi­o­la­cein. This pig­ment is pref­er­en­tially pro­duced when glyc­erol is the car­bon source. There is a cor­re­la­tion be­tween vi­o­la­cein pro­duc­tion, biofilm for­ma­tion, and greater sur­vival, sug­gest­ing that it may play a role in re­sponse to en­vi­ron­men­tal stress.

an­thi­nobac­terium cul­tured on NB agar. Source

While vi­o­la­cein ben­e­fits the host di­rectly, it is also known to be toxic against bac­te­ria, viruses, pro­tozoa, and fungi. A re­cent study showed that J. lividum also pro­duces in­dole-3-car­box­alde­hyde, and that this plays a role in a pos­si­ble mu­tu­al­is­tic re­la­tion­ship with the red-backed sala­man­der Pletho­don cinereus. These sala­man­ders are of­ten in­fected with the chytrid fun­gus Batrachochy­trium den­dro­ba­tidis, one of the main pathogens im­pli­cated in the near ex­tinc­tion of cer­tain am­phibians. B. den­dro­ba­tidis in­fects the skin of am­phib­ians and causes a dis­ease known as chytri­diomycosis. Am­phib­ian species that carry higher amounts of J. lividum can with­stand this devas­tating in­fec­tion be­cause the anti-fun­gal com­pounds pro­duced by the bac­te­ria are lethal to B. den­dro­ba­tidis. Ex­ploit­ing the bi­o­log­i­cal prop­er­ties of J. lividum may help to pro­vide anti-fun­gal re­sis­tance to the dwin­dling am­phib­ian pop­u­la­tion.
 

An adult red-backed sala­man­der, Pletho­don cinereus. Source

In ad­di­tion to its anti-fun­gal prod­uct, three an­tibi­otics pro­duced by J. lividum act against both Gram-neg­a­tive and Gram-pos­i­tive bac­te­ria. (They're be­ing patented.) Be­sides mak­ing its own an­tibi­otics, J. lividum also has the ca­pac­ity to re­sist oth­ers. It was re­cently found to pos­sess a di­ver­gent, in­ducible, chro­mo­so­ma­lly-en­coded met­allo-β-lac­ta­mase (MBL) called THIN‑B, which, when cloned into Es­cherichia coli, con­ferred greater re­sis­tance to β‑lactam an­tibi­otics. MBLs have be­come in­creas­ingly well known be­cause var­i­ous pathogens have be­come an­tibi­otic-re­sis­tant due to mo­bile MBLs. While none of these mo­bile MBLs have been de­fin­i­tively traced back to an en­vi­ron­men­tal, non-patho­­genic strain, it is con­sid­ered likely that such strains are serv­ing as a reser­voir. The mo­bile MBLs are most com­monly en­coded by gene cas­settes in class 1 in­te­grons and are be­com­ing wide­spread in Acine­to­bac­ter and Pseudomonas, two bugs well known for caus­ing hos­pi­tal-ac­quired in­fec­tions. The func­tion of these genes in the en­vi­ron­men­tal strains is cur­rently a mys­tery. If the only func­tion of MBLs is to pro­vide re­sis­tance to β‑lactams, why are they so wide­spread in en­vi­ron­ments where β‑lactams are not com­mon? In what seems to be a puz­zling anom­aly, J. lividum is unique among β‑proteobacteria in mak­ing an MBL.

J. lividum has many fas­ci­nat­ing at­trib­utes that will surely be stud­ied more in years to come. With only 43 PubMed hits, there is still much to learn about J. lividum. If you didn't know much about it be­fore, well, now you know a bit more.

 

*Jenna, Rhona, Rosa, and Chi­tra were stu­dents in the Uni­ver­sity of Cal­i­for­nia at San Diego/San Diego State Uni­ver­sity In­te­gra­tive Mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy grad­u­ate course dur­ing the 2009 win­ter quar­ter.

 

Other Posts

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
17 years ago

What a fan­tas­tic topic! Ku­dos to the au­thors! I love the com­men­sal­ism as­pect. Mi­crobes rule every­where, truly.
The de­scrip­tion of vi­o­la­cein re­minds me of an "old skool" ex­per­i­ment that I learned from Ed Lead­bet­ter: us­ing vi­o­la­cein biosyn­the­sis as a mea­sure­ment of the pres­ence of tryp­to­phan (since Chro­mobac­terium type or­gan­isms con­vert the lat­ter to vi­o­la­cein, which is very pur­ple in­deed). The tech­nique is fairly quan­ti­ta­tive, and a lovely stu­dent demon­stra­tion.
Here is the old ref­er­ence that is well worth read­ing:
Se­bek, OK. (1965). "Mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal method for the de­ter­mi­na­tion of L‑tryptophan." J. Bac­te­riol. 90: 1026 — 1031.
I have a strain of this or­gan­ism that doesn't pro­duce QSM. It is not pur­ple in cul­ture and de­cid­edly does not form biofilms. Again, a cool topic for ex­per­i­ments for un­der­grad­u­ates!

16 years ago

I have been work­ing with an iso­late that ex­hib­ited a 99.1% 16S rRNA match to this genus and have in­for­ma­tion if any­one is in­ter­ested. Other no­table traits- cop­per lov­ing, and Mac­Conkey pos­i­tive!