Sex­u­ally Avoided Dis­ease

by Willie Wil­son

The Red Queen's race in Lewis Carroll's Al­ice in Wonder­land is a com­mon metaphor for an evo­lu­tion­ary arms race. A good ex­am­ple can be seen in preda­tor-prey dy–namics, par­tic­u­larly virus-host in­ter­ac­tions where hosts must rapidly evolve im­mu­nity to in­fec­tion for sur­vival of the species. It takes all the run­ning you can do to stay in the same place.

Fig­ure 1. True color satel­lite im­age of a mil­ky E. hux­leyi bloom in the Eng­lish Chan­nel, south of Ply­mouth, UK, on 30 July 1999. This bloom was ef­fec­tively 'dead' and up to 1 mil­lion E. hux­leyi-spe­cific coc­col­ithoviruses per tea­spoon of wa­ter were found in the mid­dle of the high-re­flectance wa­ter. Cour­tesy of the Ply­mouth Ma­rine Lab­o­ra­tory Re­mote Sen­sing Group

Red Queen dy­nam­ics can also help ex­plain the bloom-bust cy­cles of oceanic al­gae that can be seen read­ily from space in satel­lite im­ages. One such alga is Emil­ia­nia hux­leyi, a 5 µm di­am­e­ter eu­kary­otic cell that has an elabo­rate ar­mory of cal­care­ous coc­col­iths. It is ubiq­ui­tous in the world's oceans and forms dense milky blooms that cover vast ar­eas of mainly tem­per­ate oceans. Un­til re­cently, the mech­a­nisms of E. hux­leyi bloom disinte­gra­tion were poorly un­der­stood, but it is now ac­cepted that viruses (re­ferred to as coc­col­ithoviruses) are in­trin­si­cally linked to these sud­den crashes.

A re­cent re­port de­scribes a novel sex strat­egy that E. hux­leyi has adopted to avoid coc­col­ithovirus in­fec­tion. The team thinks the so­lu­tion is so in­cred­i­ble they have dubbed it the 'Cheshire Cat' es­cape strat­egy, af­ter the dis­ap­pear­ing an­tics of an­other fa­mous char­ac­ter in Lewis Carroll's book. The mi­croalga re­sponds to coc­col­ithovirus at­tack by switch­ing from its usual diploid life stage (where it is sus­cep­ti­ble to in­fec­tion) to a hap­loid cell, es­sen­tially chang­ing its phys­i­cal ap­pear­ance, mak­ing it im­pen­e­tra­ble to the deadly coc­col­ithovirus. As diploids, E. hux­leyi are non-motile coc­­col­ith-bear­ing cells, per­haps ironic given some early think­ing that coc­col­iths ac­tu­ally played an an­tivi­ral role. The motile fla­gel­lated hap­loid cells lose their chalk ar­mory and are in­stead cov­ered by or­ganic scales which may be the mech­a­nism of re­sis­tance by act­ing as a phys­i­cal bar­rier.

Fig­ure 2. Virus (ap­prox. 190 nm di­am­e­ter) at­tached to a coc­col­ith from an E. hux­leyi cell. Source

It is a clever an­tivi­ral strat­egy and will cre­ate a reser­voir of re­sis­tant hap­loid cells that can have sex and pos­si­bly cre­ate a huge va­ri­ety of new E. hux­leyi geno­types. Even­tually, some of the fit­ter geno­types will suc­ceed in gene­rating new blooms when the en­vi­ron­men­tal con­di­tions are fa­vor­able. This con­stantly chang­ing ge­netic land­scape in re­sponse to coc­col­ithovirus in­fec­tion will be crit­i­cal in buffer­ing the ef­fects of rapid cli­mate change, such mi­croorganisms will be the first to re­act and adapt to a chang­ing ocean. Se­lec­tion for sex­ual re­pro­duc­tion as an an­tivi­ral mech­a­nism will also main­tain a high di­ver­sity en­sur­ing that there will al­ways be a ge­netic vari­ant that can adapt to a par­tic­u­lar en­vi­ron­men­tal con­di­tion.

With the syn­er­gis­tic ef­fect of chem­i­cal war­fare and se­lec­tive graz­ing of coc­col­ithovirus in­fected cells you al­most start feel­ing sorry for the E. hux­leyi-spe­cific coc­col­ithoviruses with so many sys­tematic an­tivi­ral mech­a­nisms in place. How­ever, with such an an­cient evo­lu­tion­ary ori­gin and a huge genome of novel and un­known genes, it is likely the coc­col­ithoviruses have a bar­rage of equally clever counter-in­tel­li­gence strate­gies to en­sure the coc­col­ithoviruses are ul­ti­mately the vic­tors. Clearly it is part of a com­plex evo­lu­tion­ary arms race that Red Queen and now Cheshire Cat hy­pothe­ses are try­ing to epit­o­mize, but as a ma­rine vi­rol­o­gist, I like to think the coc­col­ithoviruses have the up­per edge!

 

Willie Wilson

Willie Wil­son is Se­nior Re­search Sci­en­tist at Bigelow Lab­o­ra­tory for Ocean Sci­ences, West Booth­bay Har­bor, Maine. An au­thor­ity on ma­rine viruses, he is an au­thor of nu­mer­ous re­ports in this field, in­clud­ing this one, this one, and this one.

 

Other Posts

  • The COVID-19 Virus by the Num­bers

    by Elio — The trio of Yi­non Bar-On, Rob Phillips, and Ron Milo, here aug­mented by Avi Flamholz, have done it again. In the past, they pre­sented us the as­tound­ing num­bers for the dis­tri­b­u­tion of bio­mass on this planet, no less. We high­lighted this sem­i­nal con­tri­bu­tion to our un­der­stand­ing of the liv­ing world...

  • I → Y → II ?

    by Christoph — Don't worry, STC won't switch to cu­nei­form with­out warn­ing. What va­gue­ly re­sem­bles a chemi­cal for­mu­la or a cu­nei­form text is meant to keep the ti­tle as short as pos­sible. More ver­bose: I will take a clos­er look at Y‑shap­ed bac­te­r­ia to see if their "ir­re­gu­lar" shape points to their mode of cell di­vi­sion...

  • Deadly Pret­zels

    by Elio — Nasty stuff, those tox­ins re­spon­si­ble for the tox­i­c­ity of deadly poi­so­nous Amanita mush­rooms. They are pret­zel-shaped, bi­cyclic octa- and hep­tapep­tides known as am­a­tox­ins and phal­lo­tox­ins. One of them, α‑amanitin, is fa­mil­iar to many as a handy reagent for in­hibit­ing RNA poly­merase II in the lab. An­other one, phal­loidin, binds to actin and in­hibits...

  • No Free Lunch for Cheaters

    by S. Mar­vin Fried­man — Bac­te­ria en­gage in a va­ri­ety of be­hav­iors that re­quire co­or­di­nated gene ex­pres­sion, such as bi­o­lu­mi­nes­cence, biofilm for­ma­tion, pro­duc­tion of vir­u­lence fac­tors, and an­tibi­otic re­sis­tance. In these sit­u­a­tions, gene ex­pres­sion re­quires a crit­i­cal num­ber of cells. In its ab­sence, the ex­er­cise would be in vain, some­thing like...

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Ira
17 years ago

Good ar­ti­cle. Thank you.
I clicked on the CHANGING OCEANS link which talked about the in­creased acid­ity of the oceans.
Do you have links to ex­per­i­ments which have tested virus/alga multi-gen­er­a­tional in­ter­ac­tion in changed con­di­tions — higher wa­ter tem­per­a­ture, in­creased acid­ity ??
Mr. Schaechter: I dis­cov­ered your site via a link on a French sci­ence blog — http://bacterioblog.over-blog.com/ — it de­serves a plug 🙂
IRA in new york city

17 years ago

Good ques­tion. Very lit­tle has been done look­ing at the ef­fects of ocean acid­i­fi­ca­tion on virus ac­tiv­ity, hence the jury is still out. The fol­low­ing pa­per by a Nor­we­gian group shows there is re­duced preva­lence of some viruses with in­creased acid­ity (meso­cosm study)
http://www.biogeosciences.net/5/523/2008/bg‑5–523-2008.html
Ef­fects of tem­per­a­ture have been looked at a bit more. Par­tic­u­larly in re­la­tion to coral bleach­ing. We have pub­lished a few ar­ti­cles about this (see URLs be­low), our work­ing hy­poth­e­sis is that 'la­tent' viruses are in­duced (in sym­bi­otic zoox­an­thel­lae) by a rise in sea­wa­ter tem­per­a­ture (a clas­sic tem­per­ate re­sponse I sup­pose). This sim­ple ex­pla­na­tion would eas­ily ex­plain mass bleach­ing events seen in coral reefs dur­ing ex­cep­tional sea­wa­ter tem­per­a­ture in­creases (for ex­am­ple El Nino events). I have no doubt that the real story is far more com­plex, but it is al­way nice to think viruses are re­spon­si­ble!
http://www.springerlink.com/content/e947hgkjepxlrqj5/?p=36b6c02f1ad7423ebdddb3e870a3fdc6&pi=26
http://www.int-res.com/articles/ame/25/a025p099.pdf
http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/dao/v69/n1/p101-110/

ira
17 years ago

Thank you Mr. Wil­son for the links
I'll be read­ing them later to­day ^^

17 years ago

let me tell you that even if you do not ac­cept this com­ment the in­for­ma­tion you have in your post is won­der­ful, very com­plete, very use­ful, in­ter­est­ing. Is just won­der­ful, this is a won­der­ful ar­ti­cle!
Thank you for shar­ing!!!
Ta­tiana E. Jef­frey
Elio re­sponds:
True, we nor­mally don't post com­ments from com­mer­cial sources only dis­tantly re­lated to our blog. How­ever, your can­dor in as­sum­ing that we won't ac­cept it is re­fresh­ing, so here it is.

Tatiana E. Jeffrey
17 years ago

n_n
thank you!!
by the way, I do like your ar­ti­cle very much. It is very in­ter­est­ing!
Ta­tiana E. Jef­frey