Tal­mu­dic Ques­tion #39

Ex­cept for vi­roids, can you think of any place where there are "naked," (cap­sid­less) viruses out­side of hosts?

 

Other Posts

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
18 years ago

I re­mem­ber read­ing mea­sure­ments of DNA in cer­tain ma­rine en­vi­ron­ments, out­side of cells. Much higher than ex­pected. I can't find the ref­er­ence at present, for which I apol­o­gize. There may be DNA el­e­ments of the type you hy­poth­e­size float­ing around. And just like IS el­e­ments, how would we know un­less they caused phe­no­typic changes in or­gan­isms that we study? I think that some of the phage-a-holics (and I love their work) are look­ing for phage-spe­cific genes in the en­vi­ron­ment. From lysed phage heads? Or naked DNA? If there are many mech­a­nisms by which naked DNA is taken up by prokary­otic cells, why not some DNA el­e­ments that "par­a­sitize" that process?

18 years ago

I WAS go­ing to say "F plas­mids", but I guess con­ju­ga­tional plas­mids don't re­ally count since they're not nor­mally re­ally 'ex­tra­cel­lu­lar" at any point in the process.
I sup­pose one might count genes aquired by "nat­ural com­pe­tence" (like the shiny new Desul­forudis au­d­vax­i­a­tor men­tioned in the cur­rent is­sue of "Sci­ence"), but since those don't nor­mally con­tinue to spread that way I doubt that would count ei­ther.
(Or would they? Surely by now there's a chance that at least one com­mu­nity some­where has ended up with a chunk of ge­netic ma­te­r­ial that pro­motes cell ly­sis AND easy up­take via nat­ural com­pe­tence among its host pop­u­la­tion at some point in his­tory...)

17 years ago

I like Epi­ca­nis' re­sponse of nat­ural com­pe­tence...
Oth­er­wise, an­other food for thought, there is a lot of DNA found in Pseudomonas biofilms which is sup­pose to sup­port at­tach­ment and thus fa­cil­i­tate biofilm growth. How­ever, the pres­ence of DNA may also have an al­ter­na­tive role be­sides it's "stickyness"...who knows??

Elio Schaechter
17 years ago

Rhea and Top Dog (that's what Epi­ca­nis stand for, right?),
You make great points but maybe that's not what the ques­tion asked for. I re­al­ize that a cap­sid­less virus ends up look­ing like free nu­cleic acids, but we were won­der­ing about some­thing more virus-re­lated. How­ever, I'm glad you went there. As for Rhea's point of DNA be­ing some­thing other than the queen of the mol­e­cules, we made that point in an old post . See what else DNA is good for at http://schaechter.asmblog.org/schaechter/2006/12/gifts_from_abov.html
Thanks for your com­ments.
Elio

17 years ago

When you are talk­ing about naked nu­cleic acids ex­ist­ing out­side the cell, the term virus loses mean­ing. Cer­tainly there must be trans­posons float­ing around in the en­vi­ron­ment, we just don't ob­serve this be­cause they can't have an ef­fect ex­oge­nously. Per­haps if there were some su­per com­pe­tent bac­te­r­ial cell that could pick up se­quences from its en­vi­ron­ment we would see this.