Pico Who?

by Elio

You may have heard that the small­est free-liv­ing eukar­yote is Os­tre­o­coc­cus tauri. So they say. O. tauri is in­deed a tiny green alga. It is en­dowed with just one chloro­plast, one mi­to­chon­drion, a Golgi body, and not much cyto­plasm. Some­times it is only 1.0 μm in di­am­e­ter – yes, smaller even than quite a few prokary­otes. But it is not alone in this re­spect. In the oceans and else­where, one can find lots of other very small eu­kary­otes.

An un­named French in­ves­ti­ga­tor ex­am­ines a cul­ture of O. tauri. Source: Le Jour­nal du CNRS

Col­lec­tively they are known as the pi­coeukary­otes; when com­bined with bac­te­ria, they make up the ma­rine pico­plankton (that is, cells 0.2–2 μm in di­am­e­ter). Al­though most pi­coeukary­otes look pretty much alike, they en­com­pass a very di­verse group within that catch-all cat­e­gory, the pro­tists. By and large, they have been known for only five or six years, so this is news to many of us. Big news in fact, be­cause they are present in num­bers rang­ing be­tween 103 and 104 cells/ml of sea­wa­ter. A rough cal­cu­la­tion says that their cu­mu­la­tive weight in the ocean (us­ing around 1024 ml as a guess for the vol­ume of the likely habi­tats) amounts to about 109 met­ric tons (that's the weight of some ten mil­lion blue whales). Say we're wrong by a cou­ple of or­ders of mag­ni­tude, there are still lots of them. This is also the es­ti­mated weight of all ma­rine phages, which are some 1000 times more abun­dant but also about 1000 times smaller than the "pi­cos."

Elec­tron cry­oto­mo­graphic re­con­struc­tion of an O. tauri cell. n=nucleus; c=chloro­plast; p=peroxisome; er=endoplasmic re­ticulum; purple=mitochondrion. Source

What do these minia­tur­ized eu­kary­otes do? The ma­rine pi­coeukary­otes seem to be about equally di­vided be­tween pho­totrophs and het­erotrophs. The for­mer con­tribute much of the to­tal oceanic pho­to­syn­the­sis, ap­parently out­do­ing the most abun­dant pho­totrophic cyanobac­te­ria, Syne­chococ­cus and Prochloro­coc­cus. In a study of cen­tral North At­lantic sur­face wa­ters, only 10% of the sur­face pi­coplank­ton con­sisted of eu­kary­otes. But be­ing larger than bac­te­ria, they ac­counted for 60% of the bio­mass and 68% of the pho­to­syn­thetic pro­duc­tion. Eco­log­i­cally speak­ing, cell size sug­gests the level a uni­cellular or­gan­ism oc­cu­pies in the food chain. Given that phago­cytic or­gan­isms tend to prey on those smaller than them­selves, pi­coeukary­otes would be found near the base of food webs.

Some pi­coeukary­otes, such as Mi­cromonas pusilla, can be grown in pure cul­ture, but so far most can­not. Even when they can­not be cul­tured, we know they are there thanks to flu­o­res­cence and elec­tron mi­croscopy, flow cy­tom­e­try, and metage­nomic analy­sis. Sev­eral of these or­gan­isms ap­peared ideal for use as model sys­tems and thus are be­ing in­ten­sively in­ves­ti­gated. O. tauri is one of those whose genomes have al­ready been se­quenced. Be­fit­ting its size, it has a small and very com­pact genome. Its 8000 or so genes make up a hefty 82% of its 12.5 Mb genome. To date, O. tauri also has the dis­tinc­tion of be­ing the only eu­kary­otic cell that has been ob­served in its en­tirety by elec­tron cry­oto­mog­ra­phy.

Epi­flu­o­res­cence mi­croscopy of Cyani­dio­schyzon mero­lae 10D. Red = auto-flu­o­r­es­cence due to chloro­phyll; blue=DAPI-stain­ing of DNA. Source

We have pre­vi­ously men­tioned Cyani­dioschy­zon mero­lae in these pages. This has been the or­gan­ism of choice for study­ing how sin­gle or­ganelles in a cell are repli­cated and then ac­cu­rately dis­trib­uted to the daugh­ter cells upon cell di­vi­sion. It turns out that its sin­gle mi­to­chon­drion be­comes at­tached to the mi­totic spin­dle! An­other star­tling find­ing is that some of its tRNA genes are cir­cu­larly per­muted, as are the genomes of some phages. But C. me­rolae does it dif­fer­ently, their halves be­ing in a back­ward ori­en­ta­tion with the 3' half of the gene be­ing up­stream of the 5' one.

Pi­coeukary­otes are among the most abun­dant of our fel­low trav­el­ers on this planet. They de­serve our at­ten­tion.
 

 

Other Posts

  • A Tale of Three Yeasts

    by Merry Youle — This is a story of three species of yeast, three closely re­lated Sac­cha­romyces. For each of them, the en­tire genome se­quence is known. So closely re­lated are they that more than 99.95% of their genes are con­served. In other taxa, they would be con­sid­ered...

  • The Most Abun­dant Small Things Con­sid­ered

    by Merry Youle & Gemma Reguera — The pi­o­neer­ing se­quenc­ing of en­vi­ron­men­tal 16S rRNA bac­te­r­ial genes from Sar­gasso Sea sam­ples, re­ported by Gio­van­noni and col­leagues in a 1990 'Na­ture' pa­per, re­vealed a great ge­netic di­ver­sity of ma­rine bac­te­ria. It also iden­ti­fied the most abun­dant rRNA se­quences as be­long­ing to a group of bac­te­ria with no cul­ti­vated rep­re­sen­ta­tives...

  • Oddly Mi­cro­bial: Pri­ons

    by Mar­cia Stone — Pri­ons can turn their vic­tims into zombies—they punch holes in their brains and steal their souls. The in­fected stum­ble about, might take a bite out of some­one if hun­gry, cer­tainly don't think straight and, most im­por­tant, lose their mem­o­ries and with them the very essence of their hu­man­ity or "soul." Zom­bie…

  • Go­ing Next Door With­out Get­ting Your Feet Wet

    by Elio — In­tra­cel­lu­lar life has its perks. In­side host cells, bac­te­ria are pro­tected from neu­trophils, com­ple­ment, an­ti­bod­ies, some an­tibi­otics, and the other un­pleas­ant things float­ing around in tis­sue flu­ids. In ad­di­tion, here they have ac­cess to am­ple food. But there is a catch, namely how to in­fect other cells and other hosts…

  • Fish­ing With Al­gae For Malaria Vac­cines

    by James Gre­gory — Malaria is a big killer and a ma­jor world­wide health con­cern. The num­ber of malaria-re­lated deaths has fallen to ap­prox­i­mately 650,000 in 2010, from well over 1 mil­lion just ten years ago, thanks to the World Health Or­ga­ni­za­tion (WHO) and to phil­an­thropic or­ga­ni­za­tions, in­clud­ing the Bill and Melinda Gates Foun­da­tion. This ef­fort, com­posed…

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
18 years ago

What a great post, Elio! I'm amazed that no­body else has com­mented. Keep up the good work — es­says such as this help make the world of mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy ac­ces­si­ble to non-sci­en­tists.

18 years ago

I con­tinue to think a "view me­ter" or "hit me­ter" would be a good thing. My guess is that many, many peo­ple read these es­says and do not post re­sponses.
Text­books are great. Jour­nal ar­ti­cles are fan­tas­tic. Meet­ings are won­der­ful. But I learn new things with the ma­jor­ity of the es­says that Elio and Merry re­search and post at this blog. It truly is a use­ful re­source for re­searchers, ed­u­ca­tors, and laypeo­ple in­ter­ested in the mi­cro­bial world around and within us.

elio
18 years ago

Mark (and every­one else!),
Your kind words are al­ways ap­pre­ci­ated and so are your keen thoughts. Our soft­ware does let us track how many vis­its we have. The num­bers are not huge-usu­ally around 300–400 daily dur­ing the week-but cer­tainly re­spectable. Given that our in­tended au­di­ence is peo­ple with some mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy train­ing and not the gen­eral pub­lic, we be­lieve that the blog is read by a sat­is­fy­ing num­ber of mi­cro­bi­ol­o­gists. Those who sub­scribe via RSS feed and are not in­cluded in our count. Our im­pres­sion, gleaned from in­for­mally, is that the blog is gen­er­ally well re­ceived.
Here is what we ask other read­ers to con­sider:
1. Sub­scribe to the blog via the RSS feed. This way, you will get au­to­matic no­ti­fi­ca­tions on the web page of your choice.
2. Please send us com­ments. We should get more of them. The blog is in­tended as your fo­rum for ideas, sug­ges­tions, ex­change of in­for­ma­tion, etc. Please see it as your own site.
3. For those of you who teach mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy, use items from the blog for sup­ple­men­tal read­ing and aca­d­e­mic en­rich­ment. Use Tal­mu­dic Ques­tions for ex­ams, es­pe­cially in ad­vanced courses.
Merry and I send a lot of time on the blog. If you value it in any way, please con­sider some of the above sug­ges­tions. They will be greatly val­ued and warmly ap­pre­ci­ated.
Elio

18 years ago

Dear Merry and Elio: I just thought it was im­por­tant that other peo­ple knew how of­ten STC was be­ing accessed—Dr. Ay­ers' com­ment prompted me.
Tal­mu­dic ques­tions are beloved and hated by students...because they bring to­gether every­thing.
I like ask­ing stu­dents on the first day to de­scribe "prokary­otic ac­tiv­ity in the bios­phere."
Then I ask it again at the end of the course.
It's all about the Prokary­otic Pride (with apolo­gies to Norm Pace, yet again).

Dunbar
18 years ago

A 290 Mb genome wouldn't qual­ify such a species the dis­tinc­tion of hav­ing the largest known genome– for in­stance, the hu­man genome is about 300 Mb. Do­ing some google re­search, the ac­tual num­ber ap­pears to be 6.7*10^2 Mb.
Dun­bar, we should have said "one of the largest mi­cro­bial genomes." Thanks for the com­ment.
Elio

18 years ago

I think your 2nd fig­ure does not show a Cyani­dioschy­zon cell to­mog­ra­phy but rather an Os­tre­o­coc­cus cell. BTW, great post, as usual!