Gul­liver and the Lil­liputians

by Elio & Merry

Two ar­chaea walk into a bar and the bar­tender says… No, we don't have an end­ing for this joke (tell us if you do!), but if the tem­per­a­ture of the bar were around 90°C and the lo­cal­ity a hy­drother­mal vent off Ice­land, there is a chance that the pair saun­ter­ing in could be one of the most in­ter­est­ing duos around. One part­ner is Ig­no­coc­cus hos­pi­talis, an ar­chaeon of re­spectable di­men­sions (2 μm di­am­e­ter) that is of­ten seen in close as­so­ci­a­tion with the much smaller Nanoar­chaeon eq­ui­tans.

"I found my arms and legs were strongly fas­tened on each side to the ground." Gul­liver's Trav­els, as illustrat­ed by Milo Win­ter.

To start with, the names of the or­gan­isms were cho­sen with care. Ig­no­coc­cus means "fiery coc­cus;" hos­pi­talis, "host;" eq­ui­tans, "horse rider." So, what about them?

I. hos­pi­talis is an anaer­o­bic chemolithotroph that gets its en­ergy from ox­i­diz­ing el­e­men­tal sul­fur us­ing mol­e­c­u­lar hy­drogen as the elec­tron donor. N. eq­ui­tans is tiny – ap­proximately 400 nm in di­am­e­ter – and has one of the small­est known genomes, some 490 kb. It lacks nearly all genes for lipid, co­fac­tor, amino acid, and nu­cleotide bio­synthesis. Not sur­pris­ingly, it can't be grown alone in the lab. It ob­tains its mem­brane lipids from its part­ner, and likely its amino acids, as well. For more in­ti­mate de­tails, see a new re­port in the Jour­nal of Bac­te­ri­ol­ogy that de­scribes an in­ter­est­ing col­lec­tion of phys­i­o­log­i­cal and struc­tural stud­ies.

One would ex­pect such a drain of re­sources to have some neg­a­tive im­pact on the host cells, but in the lab I. hos­pi­talis grows just as well with or with­out its part­ner. Its dou­bling time is not re­duced, and nei­ther is the fi­nal cell den­sity. How­ever, some­thing is go­ing on. Dur­ing ex­po­nen­tial growth in co-cul­tures, about a third of the Ig­no­coc­cus cells are seen to carry 2–3 N. eq­ui­tans cells. When en­tering the sta­tion­ary phase, most Ig­no­coc­cus cells are cov­ered with as many as ten N. eq­ui­tans, re­mind­ing us of Gul­liver out­num­bered and over­run by Lil­liputians. On the other hand, N. eq­ui­tans does not pro­lif­er­ate un­til the host en­ters sta­tion­ary phase. Who's in­hibit­ing whom? This sounds com­pli­cated. The au­thors sug­gest:"…that the as­so­ci­a­tion of I. hos­pi­talis and N. eq­ui­tans repre­sents a highly spe­cial­ized sys­tem. Con­se­quently, as­sign­ment to the clas­si­cal cat­e­gory of sym­bio­sis, com­men­sal­ism, or par­a­sitism might not be pos­si­ble even in the fu­ture."

TEM of ul­tra­thin sec­tions of I. hos­pi­talis and N. eq­ui­tans fol­low­ing cryopro­cessing. CM, cy­to­plas­mic mem­brane; OM, outer mem­brane; Pp, periplasm; PV, periplas­mic vesi­cles. White ar­rows point to the con­tact site where the I. hos­pi­talis outer mem­brane is in close con­tact with the cy­to­plas­mic mem­brane. Bars, 1 µm. Source

But N. eq­ui­tans has other unique traits that are both ex­traordinary and in­trigu­ing. Phy­lo­ge­net­i­cally, it is a thing onto it­self. For starters, it is the only char­ac­ter­ized mem­ber of the king­dom Nanoar­chaeota, a group thought to rep­re­sent a very an­cient branch of the tree of life, maybe go­ing all the way back to the be­gin­ning (the pre­cise branch­ing point be­ing still un­der de­bate.) Its diminu­tive genome pos­sesses unique and po­ten­tially an­cient an­cestral traits. Five of its tR­NAs are en­coded by genes that are split along the genome. The RNAs are later spliced to­gether. Nowhere else does one find this way of mak­ing tR­NAs. In all cases, the split oc­curs at a site ad­ja­cent to the an­ti­codon – the nor­mal lo­ca­tion for tRNA in­trons. One is prompted to won­der about the why and the how of this trans splic­ing mech­a­nism, as well as to spec­u­late about the evo­lu­tion­ary ori­gins of tR­NAs. (For the lat­est, click here.) There are nu­mer­ous pro­tein-en­cod­ing genes that are split, too. And un­like other Ar­chaea, this or­gan­ism lacks oper­ons. Not that it lacks the genes, but in­stead of be­ing clus­tered, they are scat­tered about the genome.

An­other dis­tin­guish­ing fea­ture is that N. eq­ui­tans is ar­guably the best, al­though per­haps not the only, ex­am­ple of a par­a­sitic ar­chaeon. Why the Ar­chaea have not ex­hib­ited greater gusto for a par­a­sitic lifestyle is an open ques­tion.

 

Other Posts

  • One Size Some­times Can Fit All

    by Merry Youle — In 2008, a man died in a Swedish hos­pi­tal from an an­tibi­otic-re­sis­tant uri­nary tract in­fec­tion that he had ac­quired on a re­cent trip to New Delhi. The bug re­spon­si­ble was a Kleb­siella pneu­mo­niae strain that was found to har­bor a new, plas­mid-en­coded, an­tibi­otic re­sis­tance gene. By 2009, this an­tibi­otic re­sis­tance fac­tor…

  • Biofilms Over Trou­bled Wa­ters

    by Mark O. Mar­tin — The old say­ing "pour­ing oil on trou­bled wa­ters" is a metaphor for bring­ing peace to a tur­bu­lent sit­u­a­tion. Re­cent events in the Gulf of Mex­ico have proved the con­trary, that oil poured (or spilled) upon sea­wa­ter can pro­duce the very an­tithe­sis of calm. Af­ter many weeks of con­cern...

  • How to Es­cape a Deadly Em­brace

    by Elio — The space around a sin­gle soil par­ti­cle can be one hell of a bat­tle­field. Here, ne­ma­tode worms con­sume bac­te­ria, bac­te­ria fight back and kill them, fungi suck the worms dry, and so on. Not a mo­ment of peace. These bat­tles are as in­tense as they are in­tri­cate, yet we know lit­tle…

  • The Janus Bug

    by Elio — If you won­der what I do with my­self when I'm not blog­ging, well I'll tell you. Among other things, I par­tic­i­pate in an ASM-spon­sored pod­cast called This Week In Mi­cro­bi­ol­ogy (TWIM). It's posted every two weeks and is eas­ily ac­ces­si­ble by click­ing here or go­ing to the Mi­crobe­World home page...

  • Some Like It Curved

    by Elio — Think about it: un­der­stand­ing what goes on in­side any cell is hard enough. Add to that the com­plex­i­ties of be­ing rod-shaped, and the mind starts to bog­gle. Peo­ple have won­dered about this aplenty. For sure, many ex­pe­di­tions have set out to ex­plore the poles of rod-shaped bacilli — how they are cre­ated…

4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
18 years ago

I per­son­ally don't buy 'Nanoar­chaeum' as a su­per­basal ar­chae­bac­terium — it seems more likely to be a de­rived eu­r­yarchaeote with an ac­cel­er­ated evo­lu­tion­ary rate. I wrote about this at http://catalogue-of-organisms.blogspot.com/2008/05/nature-of-nanoarchaeum.html.

elio
18 years ago

Christo­pher,
You most in­for­ma­tive blog piece "The Na­ture of Nanoar­chaeum" should be read by all in­ter­ested in its phy­logeny. It's at http://catalogue-of-organisms.blogspot.com/2008/05/nature-of-nanoarchaeum.html
Thanks for point­ing it out.
Elio

Autumn Cochrane
18 years ago

Okay, I'm go­ing to ask a ques­tion, and then try to an­swer it, and see if I'm right.
QUESTION: If N.Eq. lacks nearly all genes for lipids, co­fac­tors, amino acids, and nu­cleotide biosyn­the­sis, shouldn't it be clas­si­fied as a virus?
Pos­si­ble An­swer: It's be­cause of the "lacks nearly" phrase, isn't it. It does carry some genes for its own lipids, etc., while viruses don't carry any of these genes. (?)
An­other ques­tion: Since I know very lit­tle of the genome of viruses, what ex­actly does the vi­ral genome en­code for?
Note: As al­ways, thanks for the blog, and thanks for the TQ's! I find them ac­tu­ally fun to pon­der. The blog is a great way to learn and pick up lit­tle bits of ad­vanced bi­ol­ogy con­cepts. I'm go­ing to be like a walk­ing text­book by the time I go off to a 4‑year uni­ver­sity (LOL)!
Au­tumn,
See a dis­cus­sion of what's of a virus in TQ#6, which in­cludes a com­ment of yours. A pop­u­lar view of the dis­tinc­tion is that a virus breaks up into its con­stituents dur­ing repli­ca­tion, some­thing a cell never does. You'll see more about this in the blog soon. The genes are car­ried by vi­ral genomes is a big ques­tion, as they vary be­tween a few and many hun­dreds. Mimivirus is said to have some 900!
Elio
Elio

14 years ago

Hi I am study­ing in high school and read many sto­ries of gul­liver in the text­books. i have al­ways a fan­tasy to travel to lil­liput. And I still won­der if we can find out such place any­where on the earth. What is ur sug­ges­tion about the re­al­ity be­hind this fact .i have also seen photo of very lit­tle woman on http://fundoosh.in there they claimed that she is the small­est woman in the world. is it true. is it pos­si­ble hav­ing such a small hu­man be­ing plz re­ply.
Elio replies:
Hi Nora,
I'm sorry to say that we are of no help. Our use of Gul­liver and the Lil­liputians was metaphoric, as we were talk­ing about bac­te­ria. Good luck to you.