Every­body Is Al­ways Talk­ing About The Weather… Re­vis­ited

by Elio

A re­cent pa­per in Sci­ence adds ev­i­dence to the no­tion that ice nu­clei, the par­ti­cles that lead to the for­ma­tion of rain and snow, are mainly of bi­o­log­i­cal ori­gin. In fact, lots of the ice nu­clei con­tain bac­te­ria that have wafted aloft. The re­searchers found that fresh snow in var­i­ous parts of the world, in­clud­ing Antarc­tica, con­tains DNA in par­ti­cles that are sen­si­tive to both lysozyme and heat. We ex­pect that metage­nomics of such sam­ples will fol­low.

Lentic­u­lar clouds above the Big Is­land. Credit: astroday.net

Where do these bac­te­ria that fly through the air with the great­est of ease come from?

The best guess is that they are lifted from the leaves of plants. They may well in­clude Pseudomo­nas sy­ringae, the or­gan­ism with the rep­u­ta­tion for caus­ing ice for­ma­tion on plants at rel­a­tively high tem­per­a­tures. This new work is part of a small but tena­cious lit­er­a­ture on the sub­ject of bac­te­r­ial par­tic­i­pa­tion in at­mos­pheric phe­nom­ena. For an evo­lu­tion­ary view­point, see John Den­nehy's blog; for a de­scrip­tion of the chal­lenges of liv­ing in the clouds, com­plete with per­ti­nent ref­er­ences, see a blog spon­sored by The New York Times. (Not that we suf­fer from com­ment-envy, but we couldn't help but no­tice that the lat­ter got 129 com­ments!)

We have long known that bac­te­ria con­tribute to the cli­mate of this planet (that is, to long range at­mos­pheric changes). There have been good rea­sons to think that bac­te­ria might also in­flu­ence the weather (i.e., what the fore­cast­ers tell you about to­day and the rest of the week). With these re­cent data, such claims be­come even more cred­i­ble.

 

Other Posts

  • Count Your Mush­rooms

    by Elio — Maybe you have to be a mush­room en­thu­si­ast or a fun­gal ecol­o­gist to give this a thought, but count­ing the num­ber of mush­rooms in a tract of for­est will not tell you the size of the fun­gal bio­mass therein. The mush­rooms you see are only the fruit bod­ies. The whole fun­gal…

  • A Whiff of Tax­on­omy – Bios­trati­cola tofi

    by Christoph — Bios­trati­cola tofi is not a "flag­ship bac­terium" of mol­e­c­u­lar bi­ol­ogy like E. coli, which was re­cent­ly ce­le­bra­ted by Ro­ber­to. In fact, it's hardly known even among hard­core mi­cro­bio­lo­gists! Yet this spe­cies is a close re­la­tive of E. coli, loo­se­ly speak­ing a first cou­sin. But as it goes...

  • Ex­plo­ration, Strep­to­myces-style

    by Roberto — The evo­lu­tion­ary tra­jec­to­ries of bac­te­ria are greatly in­flu­enced by their re­pro­duc­tive suc­cess in chang­ing en­vi­ron­ments. Of course, this is not just about how fast bac­te­ria di­vide when con­di­tions per­mit growth but also how well they sur­vive in the ab­sence of growth. In ad­di­tion, an im­por­tant de­ter­mi­nant of the over­all fit­ness of a bac­te­r­ial lin­eage is...

  • "S" is for Self

    by Elie & Rachel Diner — For all things alive, from No­bel lau­re­ates to mi­crobes, defin­ing one's "sense of self" is cru­cial for suc­cess and sur­vival. This al­lows every or­gan­ism to dis­tin­guish it­self from for­eign and po­ten­tially harm­ful agents. But to be of ben­e­fit, sim­ply iden­ti­fy­ing de­struc­tive agents is not enough. Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion must ul­ti­mately lead to...

  • The Proper Study of Man Is Bac­te­ria

    by Elio — It is of more than pass­ing in­ter­est to know which in­fec­tious dis­eases did be­set an­cient hu­mans. Such in­for­ma­tion may il­lu­mi­nate be­hav­ioral and cul­tural pat­terns dif­fi­cult to ob­tain from other sources. Thanks to mod­ern tech­nol­ogy, it is pos­si­ble to iden­tify mi­cro­bial DNAs found in an­cient hu­man re­mains. One of the most...

5 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Nathan W
18 years ago

I've al­ways meant to leave a com­ment but have never fealt that I would be able to add to the con­tent of your posts. I will leave this here in the hope that I can help cure your com­ment envy. I would com­ment an­other 128 times, but I fear that would de­feat the pur­pose.
As for ac­tual con­tent. Sea-spray must in­tro­duce a lot of mi­crobes into the at­mos­phere.

stan zahler
18 years ago

Let's ex­tend this con­ver­sa­tion a bit. I've of­ten thought that if me­te­orites can knock hunks of Mar­t­ian rocks to Earth, then surely Ter­ran me­te­orites must knock earth rocks and soil to Mars oc­ca­sion­ally. So nat­u­rally life on Mars will have right-handed sug­ars and DNAs and left-handed amino acids. And there isn't any way to tell which was the orig­i­nal donor, which the orig­i­nal re­cip­i­ent.

Eric J. Johnson
18 years ago

Stan, I don't know any exo­bi­ol­ogy, so I can't re­ally eval­u­ate this pa­per at all:
http://users.tpg.com.au/users/tps-seti/transpermia.html
...but, it re­views an es­ti­mate of a mean of 150 kg of bi­o­log­i­cally "hos­pitable" Earthly rock reach­ing Mars each year, and vice versa. "Hos­pitable" mean­ing that:
" — The ra­dius of ejected rock is be­tween 0.67 and 1 me­tre (mainly to pro­vide pro­tec­tion from ra­di­a­tion in deep space).
— The core tem­per­a­ture within the rock dur­ing ejec­tion or re-en­try did not ex­ceed 100 C (two of the dozen or so Mar­t­ian me­te­orites that have been found on Earth meet this cri­te­rion)
— The jour­ney time be­tween plan­ets was 100,000 years or less"

Eric J. Johnson
18 years ago

> And there isn't any way to tell which was the orig­i­nal donor, which the orig­i­nal re­cip­i­ent.
Ac­tu­ally, how about se­quence di­ver­sity at 16S rDNA and other highly con­served loci? Oc­cam would pro­vide that if one planet has sig­nif­i­cantly more di­ver­sity, it is much more likely to be the donor.
That's as­sum­ing we are talk­ing about a trans­fer of bac­te­ria, rather than of some kind of pu­ta­tive pre­cel­lu­lar, pre-ri­bo­so­mal life. On the face of it, it seems like the pro­posed pre­cel­lu­lar or­gan­isms or pro­toor­gan­isms about which I've hap­pened to over­hear (such as pop­u­late the ba­sic "RNA world" kind of sce­nario) might not nec­es­sar­ily trans­fer well.

Anonymous
18 years ago

Se­quence di­ver­sity of 16S rRNA is a fine cri­te­rion; but if Mar­t­ian di­ver­sity stopped di­ver­si­fy­ing one or two bil­lion years ago when the planet got too cold, mea­sure­ment of di­ver­sity gets a lit­tle tricky.
Any­way, we got some folks in­ter­ested. What a great blog!
— stan zahler