Why Have Lectures?
by Elio
Recently, I wrote an article called In Defense of the Lecture (PDF) It appeared in Resonance, a science education journal of the Indian Academy of Sciences. If you care to know what this is about, here is the first paragraph from the article:
"When it comes to teaching, everyone is an expert, so why not me? Any amount of experience, large or small, guarantees that one will hold strong views. I am no exception. In the course of over 50 years, perhaps 20,000 students have had to listen to me, the majority of whom I probably bored, a few whom I may have stimulated. I have no formal training in pedagogy. With these dubious credentials, let me make a single point: Lectures are a vital aspect of university teaching."
Comenius, Orbis sensualium pictus. Source

I couldn't agree more.
I suspect that enthusiasm is the Number One criterion for a good lecture, or lecturer.
I've always thought that multiple-choice questions were rather useless for testing. Generally speaking, I used take-home exams, pretty much open-ended, with pretty tough questions. I don't know if that would work in a time of Internet, Google, and Instant Messaging, though.
Quite an essay! Very heart-felt and succinct. I don't have a college education — after high school I educated myself. Perhaps not the best choice, but I do enjoy reading accounts of the trials and tribulations of those who attempt to educate young people!