An Up­date on: Space Odyssey, Sal­mo­nella Style

by Elio

A pre­vi­ous post re­gard­ing the ex­per­i­ments per­formed with Sal­mo­nella dur­ing a Space Shut­tle flight elicited some in­ter­est­ing com­ments. We com­mu­ni­cated them to the se­nior au­thor of the pa­per, Dr. Cheryl Nick­er­son of Ari­zona State Uni­ver­sity. She sent us the fol­low­ing though­tful and in­for­ma­tive re­sponse. We look for­ward to a flurry of fu­ture stud­ies on the ef­fects of space travel on our fa­vorite mi­cro-as­tro­nauts.

Zero grav­ity. Cour­tesy of Fab­u­lous Ad­ven­t­ures.

Cheryl Nickerson's re­sponse:

Thank you for your mes­sage. My lab was very ex­cited to see that our work is posted on your blog! I ap­pre­ci­ate your in­ter­est in our work and the op­por­tu­nity to dis­cuss our space­flight stud­ies with Sal­mo­nella. While NASA and other space agen­cies have been per­form­ing mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal flight ex­per­i­ments since the 1960's, the way mi­croor­gan­isms re­spond to the space­flight en­vi­ron­ment is still un­clear. Per­haps the great­est hur­dle of do­ing bi­o­log­i­cal re­search in space is the tremen­dous con­straints of re­sources dur­ing flight. Lim­i­ta­tions of up mass, down mass, power, and crew time cre­ate many unique chal­lenges in ex­per­i­men­tal de­sign and of­ten sim­plify work that could have mul­ti­ple pos­si­bil­i­ties. NASA has been very gen­er­ous in ac­com­mo­dat­ing our ex­per­i­men­tal re­quests, but their re­sources are con­strained as they fin­ish the In­ter­na­tional Space Sta­tion.

The Mi­crobe ex­per­i­ment was de­signed to take an ini­tial look at the ef­fect of space­flight on changes in gene ex­pres­sion and vir­u­lence, as these pa­ra­me­ters had not been pre­vi­ously in­ves­ti­gated. Your sug­ges­tion of a cen­trifuge is an ex­cel­lent con­trol, but this equip­ment was not avail­able for us on the Shut­tle. Even had a cen­trifuge been avail­able for our work, it would not have been com­pat­i­ble for use with our in-flight hard­ware. How­ever, the good news is that a cen­trifuge will be avail­able on the In­ter­na­tional Space Sta­tion and is planned for use in a fu­ture mi­cro­bial flight ex­per­i­ment headed by Dr. Max Mergeay from the Eu­ro­pean Space Agency.

An ad­di­tional point that I would like to make is that while the Mi­crobe ex­per­i­ment in­ves­ti­gated the re­sponse of mi­croor­gan­isms to the space­flight en­vi­ron­ment, we saw sim­i­lar re­sponses in the same strain of Sal­mo­nella in our lab us­ing a space­flight ana­logue cul­ture sys­tem. These sys­tems are spe­cial biore­ac­tors de­signed by NASA to sim­u­late the low fluid shear cul­ture con­di­tions en­coun­tered in the mi­cro­grav­ity en­vi­ron­ment of space­flight. Us­ing these low fluid shear biore­ac­tors, we were able to re­pro­duce many Sal­mo­nella phe­no­types that we ob­served in space­flight here on the ground — in­clud­ing an in­crease in vir­u­lence, as well as dif­fer­en­tial ex­pres­sion of many of the same classes of genes, in­clud­ing the global reg­u­la­tor Hfq. Since the ground-based biore­ac­tors were able to sim­u­late many of the Sal­mo­nella re­sponses that we ob­served dur­ing space­flight, those spe­cific changes could not be due to mi­cro­grav­ity or ion­iz­ing ra­di­a­tion, since those en­vi­ron­ments are not en­coun­tered in the biore­ac­tor. How­ever, it is im­por­tant to add that there were also dif­fer­ences ob­served in Sal­mo­nella 's re­sponses be­tween cul­ture in the biore­ac­tor and space­flight, and we do not know the un­der­ly­ing mech­a­nisms re­spon­si­ble for these changes. Thus, a great deal more work needs to be done in fu­ture ex­per­i­ments to ad­dress this, in­clud­ing the use of a cen­trifuge con­trol, and whole genome se­quenc­ing would also be rea­son­able.

Our col­lec­tive pub­lished data (from both space­flight and space­flight ana­logue cul­ture sys­tems) in­di­cate that it is the low fluid shear growth en­vi­ron­ment as­so­ci­ated with mi­cro­grav­ity, where tur­bu­lence and fluid ac­tion is min­i­mal, that plays a ma­jor role in the re­sponse of Sal­mo­nella to space­flight. Since there are also low fluid shear ar­eas in the body that are en­coun­tered by pathogens dur­ing the nat­ural course of their in­fec­tion (in­clud­ing in the gas­troin­testi­nal tract which is the pri­mary site of Sal­mo­nella in­fec­tion) it is pos­si­ble that the use of low fluid shear plat­forms may hold promise for in­no­va­tions in in­fec­tious dis­ease con­trol here on Earth. If true, that would be ex­cit­ing.

 

Other Posts

  • On Retrons

    by Habib Ma­roon — Retrons are an un­der­stud­ied type of prokary­otic retroele­ment re­spon­si­ble for the syn­the­sis of an enig­matic species of small ex­tra-chro­mo­so­mal satel­lite DNA termed mul­ti­copy sin­gle-stranded DNA (ms­DNA). ms­D­NAs are ac­tu­ally com­posed of both a sin­gle-stranded (ss) DNA and a ss­RNA. The 5' end of the ms­DNA is co­va­lently bonded to an…

  • Small RNAs Con­sid­ered

    by Janie — With the dis­cov­ery of the 𝘵𝘳𝘱 at­ten­u­a­tor in the 1970s, fol­lowed shortly by the ColE1 plas­mid RNA I, RNA be­came a much more in­ter­est­ing per­son­al­ity. The bio­mol­e­cule wears far more hats than mRNA, rRNA, and tRNA. In all its mul­ti­tudes, RNA seems to boast an in­fi­nite func­tional reper­toire...

  • The Evo­lu­tion of Death or...

    ...Is There Any­thing that the Eu­kary­otes In­vented?
    by Jamie Henzy — There is dam­age, as in a fender-ben­der, and then there is dam­age, as in "this ve­hi­cle is to­talled." The best-stud­ied re­sponse to dam­age in Es­cherichia coli (some would say, there­fore in the world) is the SOS re­sponse – me­di­ated by the recA-lexA lo­cus – in which the cell at­tempts to re­pair dam­age to its DNA.

  • Wol­bachia Make Fruit Flies Lay More Eggs to Make More Wol­bachia

    by S. Mar­vin Fried­man — f you would like to have a par­tic­u­larly strik­ing or­gan­ism named af­ter you, choose your col­lab­o­ra­tor well. The Har­vard rick­ettsi­ol­o­gist S. Burt Wol­bach was lucky to have such a col­league x the en­to­mol­o­gist Mar­shall Her­tig. In 1936, Her­tig gave the name Wol­bachia to the en­dosym­bionts of mos­qui­toes they had…

  • Fine Read­ing: The Sec­ond Skin

    Eco­log­i­cal Role Of Epibi­otic Biofilms On Ma­rine Or­gan­isms by Elio — In con­trast to air, the ocean rep­re­sents a be­nign en­vi­ron­ment for most liv­ing or­gan­isms: With the ex­cep­tion of some harsh ma­rine en­vi­ron­ments, the means of physic­o­chem­i­cal prop­er­ties are gen­er­ally not far off the op­ti­mum of most species and their fluc­tu­a­tions are mod­er­ate, rarely ex­ceed­ing bi­o­log­i­cal tol­er­ance lim­its. So be­gins a re­view…

  • 'Tis the Sea­son to be Sweat­ing

    by Elio — This is the time of the year of in­creased phys­i­cal ac­tiv­ity when we pay spe­cial at­ten­tion to cer­tain parts of the body, in­clud­ing the armpit. As is usu­ally the case, our mi­cro­biota is in­volved be­cause the odor as­so­ci­ated with sweat­ing is pro­duced by mi­cro­bial ac­tiv­ity. The main cul­prits are skin…

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
18 years ago

Nice re­sponse! I am in­ter­ested to learn if spores and such are float­ing out in space. Maybe an aero­gel put out­side the Sta­tion for a while, and then re­cov­ered and checked later, would be in­ter­est­ing.
We think a lot about me­te­orites car­ry­ing mi­crobes across in­ter­plan­e­tary dis­tances. I won­der if our near space ac­tiv­i­ties are leav­ing mi­crobes in free orbit—or if mi­crobes that make it to the stratos­phere ever get any higher (per­haps due to elec­tro­sta­tic ef­fects).
The place to look, again with an aero­gel to "softly" cap­ture any tar­gets, would be the L‑4 and L‑5 La­Grangian points where ter­res­trial and Lu­nar grav­ity can­cel out. We might find a lot of in­ter­est­ing "stuff" there—maybe even space­go­ing mi­crobes!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kordylewski_clouds
Again, Elio and Merry, thanks for fos­ter­ing dis­cus­sion.

17 years ago

Thanks for the in­for­ma­tion