Move Over, DNA

by Merry Youle

For 50 years, re­searchers have  mulled over why D. ra­dio­du­rans is able to sur­vive 100 times more ion­iz­ing ra­di­a­tion (IR) than other bac­te­ria, 2000 times more than a hu­man be­ing. Al­though both DNA and pro­teins are dam­aged by IR, DNA was widely re­garded as the crit­i­cal tar­get. That D. ra­diodurans can suf­fer 100 dou­ble strand DNA breaks per genome sug­gests an ex­tra­or­di­nary DNA re­pair mech­a­nism. Alas, such a mech­a­nism has not been found.

Two cells of D. ra­dio­du­rans  show­ing the dis­tri­b­u­tion of iron (red line) and man­ganese (turquoise, pur­ple, blue, and green lines in­di­cat­ing in­creas­ing con­cen­trations). Source

At­ten­tion shifted in 2004 when Daly et al. re­ported that the most IR-re­sis­tant bac­te­ria had 300 times more man­ganese and three times less iron than the most IR-sen­si­tive ones.

Their re­cent study demon­strates that these min­er­als pro­tect pro­teins, not DNA, from IR-in­duced ox­ida­tive dam­age. Lower the in­tra­cel­lu­lar man­ganese con­tent and the cells be­come sen­si­tive to pro­tein ox­i­da­tion and ra­di­a­tion dam­age. The re­searchers pos­tu­lated that man­ganese ions trans­form dam­ag­ing su­per­ox­ide rad­i­cals (which can't eas­ily cross the cell mem­brane) into hy­dro­gen per­oxide, which can be ex­creted. In­deed, re­sis­tant cells ex­crete per­ox­ide fol­low­ing ra­di­a­tion ex­po­sure.

The moral of this story?  Pro­tect your pro­teins and your DNA will take care of it­self.

 

Other Posts

  • The King of the Fungi

    by Elio — Small things are not be­ing con­sid­ered here. Au con­traire, I'm re­port­ing on the largest fun­gus known, if by 'fun­gus' you mean the fruit­ing body of the or­gan­ism. The rea­son for mak­ing this dis­tinc­tion is that a fun­gal mycelium can reach hu­mon­gous pro­por­tions. The hy­phae of a kind of oys­ter mush­room…

  • An An­cient Fun­gus On A Fun­gus On A Fun­gus

    by Elio — Some­times the ti­tle says it all. Ev­i­dence of my­co­par­a­sitism and hy­per­my­co­par­a­sitism in Early Cre­ta­ceous am­ber tells you: (a) that the au­thors are talk­ing about some­thing that took place some 100 mil­lion years ago, and (b) that there are sev­eral lay­ers of par­a­sitism in the spec­i­men in ques­tion. So, what is this spec­i­men...

  • The Genes, The Whole Genes, & Noth­ing But The Genes

    by Merry — We have come to ex­pect the un­ex­pected of cil­i­ates, and Oxytricha tri­fal­lax, with its ge­nomic ca­pers, does not dis­ap­point. Like many of its more fa­mous cil­i­ate rel­a­tives (e.g., para­me­cium, tetrahy­mena, sten­tor), Oxytricha is a com­plex uni­cel­lu­lar or­gan­ism with many spe­cial­ized cel­lu­lar struc­tures. Of course, they have the req­ui­site cilia for...

  • Three to Tango

    by Elio — How many sym­bioses that in­volve three part­ners can you think of? Surely, not many. But here is one, in­volv­ing a path­o­genic fun­gus, a bac­terium, and a fun­gal virus.

  • Bac­terium Linked to De­pres­sion

    Note­wor­thy — The hu­man mi­cro­biome – the col­lec­tion of mi­crobes as­so­ci­ated with our bod­ies – is vari­able, adapts to its host, but, most im­por­tantly, is in­creas­ingly rec­og­nized as im­por­tant for our health and phys­i­ol­ogy. The sheer num­ber and di­ver­sity of mi­crobes, not to men­tion their in­ter­ac­tions and ac­tiv­i­ties, makes the study of the mi­cro­biome com­plex. ...

  • Play It Again, Cyan

    by Merry — The ev­i­dence is quite com­pelling. All plas­tids (pho­to­syn­thetic or­ganelles and non-pho­to­syn­thetic kin) are thought to be de­scended from one cyanobac­terium that was en­gulfed by one uni­cel­lu­lar het­erotrophic eu­kary­ote ap­prox­i­mately one bil­lion years ago. The de­scen­dents of that host are...

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Anonymous
19 years ago

Very, Very in­ter­est­ing sum­mary!