Pathogen On Board (River Blind­ness)

by Elio

River blind­ness is a dread­ful dis­ease – the lead­ing cause of blind­ness in trop­i­cal ar­eas of the world. Its ef­fects de­vastate the lives of en­tire vil­lages. It has long been asso­ciated with in­fec­tion by the fi­lar­ial ne­ma­tode, Onchocer­ca volvu­lus. The scar­ring of the cornea that leads to blind­ness was as­sumed to be caused by the inflamma­tory re­sponse to the worms. But the story turned out to be more in­tri­cate.

Row of blind men led by chil­dren. Source: BBC

The worm hosts a bac­te­r­ial en­dosym­biont, one of the ubiq­ui­tous wol­bachias. Wol­bachia are very good at be­ing en­dosym­bionts. They are found among many invertebra­tes, es­pe­cially in­sects, where they can in­duce partheno­gen­e­sis and other al­ter­ations of sex­ual dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion. (This is a story that we promise to re­visit.) In some fi­lar­ias, in­clud­ing the ones we are talk­ing about here, the Wol­bachia re­side in the fe­male re­pro­duc­tive tract and are es­sen­tial for re­pro­duc­tion of the worms. Other types of fi­lar­ias, in­clud­ing the path­o­genic Loa loa, ap­pear to get along with­out them.

New ev­i­dence sug­gests that, with re­gards to river blind­ness, the worm is an in­no­cent by­stander, that the real cul­prit is the Wol­bachia on­board. In a mouse model, bac­te­ria-free worms don't cause dis­ease, whereas those that carry Wol­bachia do. Fur­ther­more, Wol­bachia in­side liv­ing ne­ma­todes don't cause dis­ease, ei­ther. Wit­ness the fact that adult fi­lar­ias can live in a hu­man host for as long as 14 years with­out caus­ing much dam­age. But when the worms die and the bac­te­ria are re­leased, dam­age en­sues. Treat­ment with drugs that kill the worms re­sults in fever and other signs of acute in­flam­ma­tion.

Wol­bachia sp. in ovar­ium cells of a cherry fruit fly. Source: Mi­crobe­Wiki. Photo by S. Bluemel

It's thought that the in­flam­ma­tion re­sponse is caused by an en­do­toxin-like com­pound in the Wol­bachia. The rea­son for the un­cer­tainty is that se­quenc­ing of the genome of an­other Wol­bachia (also an en­dosym­biont of a path­o­genic ne­ma­tode) tells us that the en­dosym­biont lacks some 20 of the genes needed for lipopolysaccha­ride (en­do­toxin) syn­the­sis. (As has been the case with other en­dosym­bi­otic bac­te­ria, this genome se­quence is es­pe­cially in­ter­est­ing.) Nev­er­the­less, there are sev­eral lines of ev­i­dence that point to some­thing in Wol­bachia that has en­do­toxin-like ac­tiv­ity. For ex­am­ple, mice with de­creased sen­si­tiv­ity to LPS (C3H/HeJ) are less re­spon­sive to Wol­bachia ex­tracts. In ad­di­tion, it has been found that the in­jec­tion of Wol­bachia ex­tracts leads to a rise in toll-like re­cep­tors that are in­volved in the in­flam­ma­tory re­sponse. Clearly, river blind­ness re­sults from the im­mune re­sponse to the worm's en­dosym­biont, but more de­tails need to be un­cov­ered be­fore we un­der­stand just how Wol­bachia causes dam­age to its host's host. Putting all this to­gether, it fol­lows that the dis­ease can be treated, at least in part, us­ing an­tibac­te­r­ial ther­apy.

Head of simu­lian black fly, the in­sect vec­tor for fi­lar­ias. Source: Nat­ural His­tory Mu­seum, Lon­don

Fi­lar­ias cause not only river blind­ness, but also elephan­tiasis and other dis­eases that af­fect some 200 mil­lion peo­ple world­wide, bring­ing un­told mis­ery. The prevent­ion and treat­ment of these dis­eases has been given high pri­or­ity. The World Health Or­ga­ni­za­tion has tar­geted the elim­i­na­tion of the ne­ma­todes in a num­ber of coun­tries. Since the worms are trans­mit­ted from host to host through the bite of a black fly, in­sec­ti­cides are used along with a worm-killing drug, iver­mectin. Their strat­egy does not seem to in­clude treat­ment with an­tibac­te­r­ial drugs, but this may yet change. The elim­i­na­tion of fi­laria-caused dis­eases would be a ma­jor health ac­com­plish­ment and would re­move this source of mis­ery from the lives of count­less mil­lions of peo­ple in the years ahead.

The Wol­bachia-fi­laria part­ner­ship is the only in­stance we know of an en­dosym­biont be­ing re­spon­si­ble for the ob­served path­o­genic­ity of its host. Can you think of oth­ers? (For those in the know, the Xenorhab­dus-ne­ma­tode case does not in­volve an en­dosym­biont. More on that some other time.)

 

Other Posts

  • Evo­lu­tion of a Su­per­pathogen

    by S. Mar­vin Fried­man — The en­ter­obac­terium Yersinia pestis, the causative agent of the plague, was re­spon­si­ble for many ter­ri­fy­ing out­breaks over the course of recorded his­tory, but the most dev­as­tat­ing pan­demic was known as the Black Death. Oc­cur­ring be­tween the years 1347 and 1351, it is es­ti­mated that it claimed about one-third of Europe's pop­u­la­tion, half of that of China, and one-eighth of Africa's. This dreaded dis­ease...

  • The Façade of E. coli K‑12

    by Elio — In the early days of re­com­bi­nant DNA re­search (ca. 1973), a thun­der­ous de­bate took place re­gard­ing the safety of ge­netic en­gi­neer­ing. On the one side were those who pro­posed that mess­ing with the genome could lead to the emer­gence of novel and po­ten­tially per­ni­cious pathogens. On the other side were…

  • Pa­le­ovi­rol­ogy

    by Welkin John­son — How does one even be­gin to in­ves­ti­gate the nat­ural his­tory of viruses? The di­nosaurs be­queathed a mot­ley as­sort­ment of bones, teeth, foot­prints strid­ing 'cross an­cient riverbeds, fos­silized eggs, the oc­ca­sional co­pro­lite. The tiny trilo­bite left last­ing and ubiq­ui­tous im­pres­sions, find­ing its way into...

  • The Krebs (Bi)Cycle

    by Christoph — To­day I'm tak­ing you on a short tour, a (bi)­cycle tour. Don't be alarmed, it won't be a long ride. And no pre­vi­ous fit­ness check! You can cy­cle di­rect­ly on your screen. A mi­ni­mum of brain ac­ti­vi­ty is ex­pect­ed though. You gues­sed it, it's about the Krebs cy­cle. More pre­cise­ly: The Krebs (Bi)­Cycle. Let's pedal!